Donny Epstein

Trial Lawyer. Yankees. Giants. Devils. QPR. Family. Faith. USA. Work ethic. In no particular order—unless it’s the postseason.

[Donny Epstein @DNEPSTEIN]

@OurielOhayon @NYCMayor So he’s quoting the Talmud now?

[Donny Epstein @DNEPSTEIN]

@AriA1exander And yet….

[Radically Right @RadicallyRight_]

This is so good. Take a moment to listen.

[Ambassador Yechiel (Michael) Leiter @yechielleiter]

It’s a difficult time for my family and me. A Palestinian terrorist rammed his car into my son, on reserve duty, while driving at full speed. Earlier today, I spoke to the press at Shaare Zedek Medical Center in Jerusalem where my son Neriyah (G-d’s flame) is being treated for severe injuries.

And if you don’t watch the whole thing, this is the bottom line: hundreds of thousands of people around the world are praying for our dear Neriyah, a 39 year-old economist and father of four. We feel those prayers, and we are deeply grateful for every one of them.

But his life is still in danger.

Please keep praying for him. We need a miracle.

(Video: Shaare Zedek Medical Center)

[Max 📟 @MaxNordau]

Scott Galloway lays out the numbers to Abdul El-Sayed.

• The Holocaust killed 40% of Europe's Jews
• Rwanda killed 70% of the Tutsis
• Cambodia killed 1/3 of the entire country
• In Gaza, it is 3% at most, alongside polio vaccines, 2,500 calories a day and leaflets warning civilians to leave

El-Sayed doesn't dispute a single number.

Instead, he says "we want to quibble about the words," and that the word genocide "should be used because it speaks to the moral imperative of action."

Genocide is the word the world coined for the extermination of a people. It is the gravest charge there is. And El-Sayed's case for leveling it at the Jewish state isn't that it's true.

It's that it helps him get what he wants.

[Captain Allen @CptAllenHistory]

In Israel, you often cannot tell who is Jewish and who is Arab by looking.

Lucy Aharish is the Arab-Israeli. Tzachi Halevy is the Jew. They are married.

Jews came back from Baghdad, Sana’a, Fez, Warsaw, and Addis Ababa. Ethiopian Jews are Black. Plenty of Palestinians are fairer than plenty of Israelis. The faces do not sort into the two boxes the slogan needs.

“White European colonizer” is a costume. They were not planting a flag in someone else’s country. They were a people coming home from places that never let them stop being the “other,” and they were often murdered for it.

Two million Arab citizens of Israel vote, sit in the Knesset, and fill hospital wards as doctors and pharmacists. That is not tolerance. That is a country.

The Jewish side said yes to a state beside an Arab state several times, starting in 1937. The other side has always said no to Jewish sovereignty in any part of the Land.

Trying to make this about “race” was the Soviet rebrand in the 1970s. That lie is still doing the work today, especially on campus and increasingly on the Western left.

[Isaac @isaacrrr7]

El 96% de los judíos en Polonia fueron asesinados por los nazis. Eso es genocidio.

El 3% de la población de Gaza —en su mayoría hombres combatientes— murió en la guerra que ellos mismos iniciaron. Eso no es genocidio.

[Donny Epstein @DNEPSTEIN]

Finally Joe getting the credit he deserves

[Herd w/Colin Cowherd @TheHerd]

"He literally doesn't miss. He's got great charisma, he's one of the guys, the players love him."

@colincowherd & @PhilSimmsQB talk Jaxson Dart & the New York Giants

[Neuralink @neuralink]

A beautiful surprise

[John Ondrasik @johnondrasik]

Hi @macklemore,

Wouldn’t a honest person who truly cared about Gazan’s loudly condemn Hamas for

- Murdering gays
- using innocents as human shields
- post ceasefire executions
- forced child marriage
- indoctrination of toddlers into death cult
- 10/7

Pls send tweets.

[Epstein Ostrove, LLC @EpsteinOstrove]

New Jersey Manufacturers (NJM) @NJMIns insures a defendant who rear-ended our client, Mr. Cespedes’, vehicle. NJM waited three years to make an offer on the defendant’s behalf: $75,000 from a $300,000 policy. (1/8)

[Artur Wilczynski @Arturmaks]

If you think this is artistic expression and blackface is racism, you are a hypocrite and a bigot.

[Scott Jennings @ScottJenningsKY]

If you’d like a preview of the 2028 Dem presidential debates, this is the hill AOC is currently defending

[Fox News @FoxNews]

AOC takes aim at Robert Kraft after Macklemore was dropped from Ed Sheeran's tour.

"When you see what Robert Kraft did to line up all of the stadiums, to censor speech in that one specific way, it's become clear that this is not just about one music artist or two music artists.

"This is about how just a handful of stadium owners and the elite can prevent an entire massive issue, in this case, the genocide in Gaza."

"But it doesn't stop there. It could be speaking out about any issue. You can now just get a handful of stadium owners to ensure that an entire person's career can be jeopardized if they speak out about any issue."

[Kosher @koshercockney]

Just.. stunning. A must watch.

One of the greatest Israel / Palestine arguments you will ever hear.

And by none of other than Charlie Kirk.

What an incredible loss to the world.

Rest in Peace Charlie 🪽
May his memory be a blessing 🕯️

[Jonah Platt @JonahPlatt]

Every antizionist who believes they’re “on the right side of history” while defending a dude who literally does Nazi salutes in Jewface needs to realize how profoundly they have been brainwashed into being the foot soldiers of a global anti-Jew agenda without realizing it.

[ד״ר עינת וילף Dr. Einat Wilf @EinatWilf]

Do you think there was even one person in that auditorium in Venice who, somewhere in the back of their mind, said to themselves, Wait a minute:

1) One side is holding 251 hostages, including children, grandparents, and parents.
2) It has just invaded and massacred defenseless civilians in Mongol-style fashion.
3) It has systematically turned one of the most beautiful places in the world into a fortress of hundreds of kilometers of tunnels used exclusively for warfare.
4) Its entire doctrine of warfare is built on erasing the fundamental distinction on which the laws of war rest: the distinction between combatants and non-combatants. In fact, its strategy depends on Israel being the only side bound by the laws of war.
5) It knows that Israel calculates the risk to civilians when planning military strikes, and therefore makes sure to surround itself with a minimum number of non-combatants in order to gain protection and cause Israel to call off attacks.
6) It uses mosques, hospitals, schools, and homes as weapons depots and centers of military activity.
7) There is a country, Egypt, with a border that refuses to allow people to leave the war zone. Yet instead of all the world's "humanitarians" pressuring Egypt to accept refugees fleeing a war zone, they call this "ethnic cleansing" and insist that people who are not combatants and do not want to be in a war zone must remain there, despite wanting to flee.

And on the other side, Israel:
a) Invests billions in obtaining intelligence that allows it to calculate, for each military target, how many non-combatants are likely to be killed if it is attacked.
b) Changed its calculations after the massacre regarding how many non-combatants may be put at risk or killed while still falling within the range of collateral damage permitted under the laws of war.
c) Following the massacre, decided to expand its definition of military targets to include, for example, an active Hamas member who is officially listed as "only" a police officer carrying a weapon.
d) Has lawyers who, for every strike, deliberate over whether the expected harm constitutes permissible collateral damage and whether the attack is justified under international law.

And isn't all of this rather strange behavior, and an extraordinary investment in intelligence and lawyers, for a country supposedly intent on carrying out the "indiscriminate killing of civilians/genocide"?

Do you think there was even one such person in the auditorium?

(In another post, I'll address the phenomenon of Jews giving their enemies pound after pound of flesh.)

[Donny Epstein @DNEPSTEIN]

@OKane_98 @NYGDaily You like to complain Daily.

[Donny Epstein @DNEPSTEIN]

@NYGDaily Unless everyone’s doing it. 1 min drill LGG!!!!

[Marina Medvin 🇺🇸 @MarinaMedvin]

The New York Times coverage of the Gaza-Israel war was grossly pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel, according to a peer-reviewed study. Jewish casualties were omitted or minimized while Palestinian casualties were amplified and misrepresented.

Yale University Professor Edieal Pinker published the review in the an academic journal Studies in Conflict & Terrorism. His peer-reviewed research quantitatively evaluated 1,559 New York Times articles published between October 7, 2023, and June 7, 2024, to assess potential narrative imbalances.

The study found that:

- 91% of the analyzed articles failed to mention Israeli casualties that occurred after October 7.

- 1,423 articles completely omitted mentions of both Israeli post-Oct. 7 casualties and Hamas combatant deaths.

- 50% of the articles did not reference the Israeli hostages held by Hamas during the fighting, and 41% omitted mentions of the Israeli casualties from the initial October 7 attack itself.

- Personal stories highlighting Palestinian and Lebanese suffering appeared on average two out of every three days. Comparable accounts of Israeli suffering unrelated directly to the October 7 events appeared in very few articles.

- The word "Israel" appeared 27,205 times across the dataset, compared to just 8,499 mentions of "Hamas," meaning Israel was mentioned more than three times as often. This statistical discrepancy places near-exclusive agency and responsibility on Israel while severely diminishing Hamas's role in sustaining the conflict.

Pinker concluded that these consistent editorial choices cultivated a dominant narrative portraying Israel as the sole aggressor facing few consequences beyond losing international sympathy, while Palestinians were predominantly framed as passive victims. He argues that the coverage deprives readers of a comprehensive understanding of the ongoing combat dynamics and the continuous nature of Israeli losses.

Following the initial release of the study data, The New York Times publicly defended its reporting, claiming it has covered the war with rigor and from all angles. Of course my commentary on their reporting shows that this defense is hot garbage.

The New York Times buried the Holocaust in the back pages and then doubled down on downplaying Jewish suffering after October 7. They are a disgusting business that should be boycotted.