The phrase "reasonable grounds to believe" is often misunderstood. It is a legal standard that allows police to lay charges based on the evidence available at the time. It is not a finding of guilt, nor is it the same as proving a case beyond a reasonable doubt in court.
Personally, I don't think the media should publish someone's name when there are only allegations and no conviction. Once a name is made public, the damage to a person's reputation, career, and family can be permanent, even if they are later found not guilty or the charges are dropped.
Allegations should be investigated thoroughly and reported responsibly, but there should also be greater consideration for the presumption of innocence until the facts have been tested in court.
A person's life can be changed forever by a headline. That's a responsibility the media should take seriously. Many people have been wrongly accused of sexual offences and had their lives permanently damaged.
We can support victims, take allegations seriously, and still uphold the fundamental principle that every person is innocent until proven guilty.
Justice requires both accountability and due process. If we ignore either one, public trust in the justice system, and in legitimate accusations, will continue to erode.
2026 is the new 2016, but smarter. $ZEC is what Satoshi wished $BTC could be.
Privacy. Security. Shield up. 🛡️
Ten years from now, people will ask: "Where were you when ZCash became king?"
I’m starting a petition to shutdown @pumpfun for good because it’s killed crypto and memecoins due to the rampant farming and scams that occur daily, every coin is a farm and the platform is cancer to crypto period!
It’s one big giant liquidity extraction criminal enterprise at this point
https://t.co/wWWfPQReVM