No, I don’t think you can do that.
I don’t think you can noisily welcome Omar Artan, a Somali with ties to Islamic terrorists on Wednesday, and then on Thursday give condolences for a policeman murdered by Islamic terrorists. You have to choose.
Toronto’s Communist mayor tells U.S. immigration agents to stay out of the city.
Yesterday, she welcomed a Somali antisemite, Omar Artan, with ties to the Al Shabaab terrorist group.
I had to read this three times before I could believe it was real.
Rotherham. A small town in northern England.
For sixteen years, at least 1,400 children — some as young as eleven — were raped, gang-raped, and trafficked between cities by organized groups of men.
Eleven years old.
Petrol was poured on them so they would stay quiet.
Their families were threatened with death.
Photos were taken and used as blackmail.
The police knew.
The council knew.
The social workers knew.
For sixteen years, not one of them moved.
Why?
Because officers were afraid of being called racist if they acted on what they were seeing.
That was the whole reason.
While children were being sold, adults were protecting their own reputations.
That is the moment something in you breaks.
And here is the part that makes it worse.
The TV networks did not report it. The papers did not chase it.
When the journalist Andrew Norfolk finally broke the story, even he thought maybe 150 girls had been hurt.
The real number was 1,400.
He was staggered.
This should have been the biggest story of the decade. It was not.
The networks looked away. The advertisers preferred safer topics.
The cover-up did not end when the report was published — it continued in the silence of every newsroom that refused to chase it.
Then Elon Musk bought X.
The advertisers fled.
The press declared the platform finished.
X almost did not survive.
But it did.
And on X, the names of those towns started trending.
Rotherham.
Telford.
Rochdale.
Oldham.
Towns the country had been told to forget.
Britain understands itself differently today.
Not because the politicians confessed.
Not because the broadcasters apologized.
Because one platform refused to let it stay buried.
X almost did not survive.
1,400 children almost stayed forgotten.
That is worth saying out loud.
@TurnbullWhitby Translated from Liberal to facts: "In the face of 11 years of Liberal mismanagement leading to economic disaster for Canadians, we don't want you to listen to the opposition when they point out our failures. Please only believe what we tell you, and not your wallets."
Maybe @abcnews would like to tell us more about this 'alleged stabbing' that I have 'seized upon'.
You can never hate mainstream media enough.
We are the media now.
A Government that's more concerned about Elon Musk than murderous third world migrants attempting to behead us in the street.
The Labour Party is a disgrace.
Oh Canada!! 🇨🇦
If you earn it, they tax it
If you spend it, they tax it
If you save it, they tax it
If you invest in it, they tax it
If you build it, they tax it
If you sell it, they tax it
If you live in it, they tax it
If you drive it, they tax it
If you eat it, they tax it
If you give it away, they tax it When you die, they tax it
Then they waste it & Give it away!
The liberals wont make me hate my country, I’m born and raised Canadian and I love Canada!
LIBERALS ARE DESTROYING OUR COUNTRY AND CAUSING DIVISION!
Nobody disputes that kids need protection online. The trick is that Liberals always start with “protect the children” and somehow end up with more federal control over speech, identity, platforms, and private life.
If social media is harmful to kids, then say that plainly and hold companies accountable. But a federal ban for everyone under 16 raises obvious questions: Who verifies age? What ID gets uploaded? Who stores it? What happens when the database leaks? And how long before “safety first” becomes Ottawa deciding which opinions are too dangerous for adults too?
This government could not manage passports, immigration, housing, crime, or basic affordability. Now it wants to police the internet for every Canadian family.
Parents need tools. Kids need limits. Platforms need consequences. Canada does not need another Liberal control scheme dressed up as compassion.
LABOUR UK to BAN access to non-Government issued information (the TRUTH) during a crisis.
You will be unable to access real information & you will have to rely on a far leftist Communist propaganda & their false version of events.
This same Government covers up & suppresses crimes & violence against White people.
Technology secretary Liz Kendall has unveiled plans to amend online safety laws to allow regulator Ofcom to impose a crackdown at times of heightened social & political tension.
The move will allow Ofcom to require tech firms to take tougher action on material that could ‘incite violence or disorder’ which is basically access to REAL life footage that provides the TRUTH.
This is extremely dangerous.
Along with banning Freedom of Speech & Expression, the UK will now lose their Human Right of accessing information.
COMMUNISM.
This is straight from the Bolshevik playbook.
@globalnews "Some parents let their kids eat cake all day all the time, therefore we need to ban cake for everyone!"
Leave it to Liberals to be so bad at parenting that they need daddy government to parent for them..
.. just kidding, we all know this is just Liberals pushing digital ID.
@Reil76 "There is no evidence that banning under 16s from social media automatically leads to a government controlled digital identity system."
lol.. yeah, no evidence aside from we've all seen how the Liberals have acted for the last 11 years.
Bill C-11
Bill C-18
Bill C-22
Bill C-34
Bill C-9
See the pattern yet? Note how it’s always for “safety” and “protecting children”.
There’s more I could list if this isn’t enough to at least make you stop and think “what is the end goal here?”
@DaIeJohnson@WayneMathison Well for one, they haven't had an 11-year track record of running Canada's economy into the ground and six feet underneath it... so there's that.. 🤷♂️