dadoumaiarrockstartonstar 🍌🐷

[dadoumaiarrockstartonstar 🍌🐷 @DaDou3366]

@luganodes @MultiversX @grok why luganodes takes this decision?

[dadoumaiarrockstartonstar 🍌🐷 @DaDou3366]

@deepwhale Et pour les moins values en mode bear market? Y a quelque chose de prévu?

[dadoumaiarrockstartonstar 🍌🐷 @DaDou3366]

@BitcoinCouteau @BlackXmamba14 On sait combien de temps ça va durer avant de se faire dumper tous les EGLD achetés pour cette "occasion"?

[dadoumaiarrockstartonstar 🍌🐷 @DaDou3366]

@AdrianLoghinT @the_realbull I don't receive anything 😡

[dadoumaiarrockstartonstar 🍌🐷 @DaDou3366]

@AdrianLoghinT @the_realbull Stucked for 2 hours...

[dadoumaiarrockstartonstar 🍌🐷 @DaDou3366]

@xMoney_com @CKoutsoumpos Already 1 hour waiting for my $XMN 🧐😡

[dadoumaiarrockstartonstar 🍌🐷 @DaDou3366]

@xMoney_com @CKoutsoumpos Fix the bridge! Scam project

[Solver @solver_cs]

I wanted @beniaminmincu to see this proposal. It seems he did, but the comment was hidden. Why?

@SasuRobert, I’m reaching out to you because you’re one of the few who genuinely tries to build a bridge between MVX and the community. We may not always agree, but at least we can have real discussions.

How is it acceptable to hide a comment that shares a valuable proposal? You can disagree with it, you can respond to it, but hiding it? That’s not how open dialogue should work especially in this context.

[dadoumaiarrockstartonstar 🍌🐷 @DaDou3366]

@vaken_crypto @xPortalApp @BitcoinCouteau une réponse à apporter à ça peut être?

[dadoumaiarrockstartonstar 🍌🐷 @DaDou3366]

@wavenodeValid @xMoney_com Don't take it the wrong way, but I'm leaning more towards the second option, knowing that we don't know where the exchange will take place or under what conditions...

[dadoumaiarrockstartonstar 🍌🐷 @DaDou3366]

@mr_bull_bean @aDAMNonX @xMoneyGreg @SuiNetwork @xMoney_com @beniaminmincu @lucianmincu @BitcoinCouteau tu étais au courant? Tu as parlé avec Beniamin...

[dadoumaiarrockstartonstar 🍌🐷 @DaDou3366]

@matteodotsui @xMoney_com @SuiNetwork @BitcoinCouteau un avis là dessus? Parce que ça pue vraiment cette histoire

[dadoumaiarrockstartonstar 🍌🐷 @DaDou3366]

@xBenP_web3 @GRM_Web3 Tu as swap en quoi? Usdc?

[dadoumaiarrockstartonstar 🍌🐷 @DaDou3366]

@BitcoinCouteau Perso j'ai peur pour la valeur du $UTK 😱
Après lecture de l'article sur le $XMN soit tu le bloques 6 mois pour parier sur une hausse du jeton et faire un X3, soit tu dilues tes tokens par 3 pour les avoir dispo de suite au risque que ça dump... Pas fou le choix...

[dadoumaiarrockstartonstar 🍌🐷 @DaDou3366]

@BitcoinCouteau J'espère que cette vidéo va répondre à certaines questions, et que ça sera pas une perte de temps à base de "soon"
Après bravo à toi pour cette reconnaissance de la part de Beni, tu le mérites

[dadoumaiarrockstartonstar 🍌🐷 @DaDou3366]

@BitcoinCouteau @SasuRobert https://t.co/jqMp0KoslR

[Solver @solver_cs]

And I also have a proposal, if you’re open to hear it. Keep the hard cap in place, and instead use the remaining $EGLD funds held by the Foundation to increase and extend the APR for validators, so the network can continue operating in a healthy way. Build into the proposal a clause that if no meaningful adoption happens on the chain within 2–4 years, then the hard cap could be reconsidered and eventually removed. But don’t remove it from the start — it’s simply not needed right now as long as the Foundation still has $EGLD funds.

Keep the 10% royalties for paying the developers who are still actively working on the chain, and set aside some funds for yourselves to earn rewards. The rest should be allocated to incentivize validators (exclusively validators). I haven’t done the detailed calculations, but you have many smart people within the team who could explore this direction and find a workable solution. Of course, this would need to be paired with real transparency regarding the funds currently held by the Foundation.

[dadoumaiarrockstartonstar 🍌🐷 @DaDou3366]

@JAzrharn https://t.co/jqMp0KoslR

[Solver @solver_cs]

And I also have a proposal, if you’re open to hear it. Keep the hard cap in place, and instead use the remaining $EGLD funds held by the Foundation to increase and extend the APR for validators, so the network can continue operating in a healthy way. Build into the proposal a clause that if no meaningful adoption happens on the chain within 2–4 years, then the hard cap could be reconsidered and eventually removed. But don’t remove it from the start — it’s simply not needed right now as long as the Foundation still has $EGLD funds.

Keep the 10% royalties for paying the developers who are still actively working on the chain, and set aside some funds for yourselves to earn rewards. The rest should be allocated to incentivize validators (exclusively validators). I haven’t done the detailed calculations, but you have many smart people within the team who could explore this direction and find a workable solution. Of course, this would need to be paired with real transparency regarding the funds currently held by the Foundation.

[dadoumaiarrockstartonstar 🍌🐷 @DaDou3366]

@solver_cs @SasuRobert Nice proposal 🥰

[dadoumaiarrockstartonstar 🍌🐷 @DaDou3366]

@SasuRobert @MCularea Given this post, I assume we can also abandon the idea of a made-in-USA CEO for MVX.

[dadoumaiarrockstartonstar 🍌🐷 @DaDou3366]

@SasuRobert Thanks for your answer. And what about dilution? It could be the kiss of death for the early investors as i am...