Enigmatically Simple

Libsoftiktok and Catturd are my other accounts

[Enigmatically Simple @DaRiddler79]

@Lexibexiio Huh?

You didn't mention the problem here. Other than apparently you like t-shirts. But what's the actual problem, I'm still confused

[Enigmatically Simple @DaRiddler79]

@Cotalpa_ @DataDrivenEm0 @HoodBiology I can appreciate your generic statement, but saying that my logic is flawed while not explaining how you believe it's flawed, is basically an acknowledgment that you have no real argument.

[Enigmatically Simple @DaRiddler79]

@RnDGameLab @HoodBiology 🤣 🤣 🤣 dodge? What was I dodging?

Do you even understand what your saying? I mean we've established you don't understand what I say, but do you understand what you're saying?

[Enigmatically Simple @DaRiddler79]

@DataDrivenEm0 Thanks, but both our versions assume information not present. Mine just happens to make sense

[Enigmatically Simple @DaRiddler79]

Anyone want to place bets on if I'll get the real story here?

[Cotalpa @Cotalpa_]

@DaRiddler79 @HoodBiology Good thing that's not what happened! :)

[Enigmatically Simple @DaRiddler79]

@DataDrivenEm0 @Cotalpa_ @HoodBiology I didn't beg to get mad. I just made a statement. You then went on a beautifully long tirade

[Enigmatically Simple @DaRiddler79]

@ShitpostingCen1 @HoodBiology Huh?

[Enigmatically Simple @DaRiddler79]

@DataDrivenEm0 @Cotalpa_ @HoodBiology Keep in mind, it has nothing to do with people believing differently. I can't change reality.

Lots of people believe lots of crazy shit. Do you agree with all of them as long as enough of them feel that way?

[Enigmatically Simple @DaRiddler79]

@DataDrivenEm0 @Cotalpa_ @HoodBiology The vast majority of bi people believe that simply designating yourself something different makes it so?

And yet somehow you believe I'm the one who needs the mental health? I'm confused here. And rightfully so.

Your entire argument is based on emotion. Mine isn't 🤷

[Enigmatically Simple @DaRiddler79]

@DataDrivenEm0 I got your version. It sounds less believable than mine based on just using the English language

[Enigmatically Simple @DaRiddler79]

@DataDrivenEm0 @Cotalpa_ @HoodBiology Again, and maybe I didn't say this clearly, but if your version is the correct version, then the response "it's OK, I'm bi" makes no sense.

See, I'm more than happy to refer to her as a her if that's what she wants to be called, but I'm not going to pretend that changes biology.

[Enigmatically Simple @DaRiddler79]

@Nokomis_Dad @Cotalpa_ @HoodBiology Mine still seems like the most plausible.

What's yours?

[Enigmatically Simple @DaRiddler79]

@DataDrivenEm0 @Cotalpa_ @HoodBiology Hold up.

You just conflated 2 different things.

Deception was what I was referring to.

Nice try

[Enigmatically Simple @DaRiddler79]

@SaloniVig13823 Why?

[Enigmatically Simple @DaRiddler79]

@Bathilde777 @Cotalpa_ @HoodBiology It was a suggestion for you

[Enigmatically Simple @DaRiddler79]

@sl33pyr3i @HoodBiology If that's your best argument, you are conceding the point and worrying about the messenger.

I accept your concession

[Enigmatically Simple @DaRiddler79]

@sl33pyr3i @HoodBiology That wouldn't change the underlying words.

"It's OK, I'm bisexual" is the statement someone would make when they discover the deception, not when they realize they are still gay, still with a dude.

The words don't work like that

[Enigmatically Simple @DaRiddler79]

@DataDrivenEm0 @Cotalpa_ @HoodBiology That makes no sense.

So in your opinion, they were 2 gay dudes, one said "I'm trans" and the other said "don't worry, I also like girls"?

See how that makes no sense? Plus he would still just be gay. Which is fine, but at least accurate

[Enigmatically Simple @DaRiddler79]

@DataDrivenEm0 @HoodBiology No, I understand clearly.

[Enigmatically Simple @DaRiddler79]

@Nokomis_Dad @Cotalpa_ @HoodBiology That's not an answer

[Enigmatically Simple @DaRiddler79]

@ShitpostingCen1 @HoodBiology Sure. I appreciate your thoughts.

Then why would there need to be a big reveal?