@Cotalpa_@DataDrivenEm0@HoodBiology I can appreciate your generic statement, but saying that my logic is flawed while not explaining how you believe it's flawed, is basically an acknowledgment that you have no real argument.
@RnDGameLab@HoodBiology π€£ π€£ π€£ dodge? What was I dodging?
Do you even understand what your saying? I mean we've established you don't understand what I say, but do you understand what you're saying?
@DataDrivenEm0@Cotalpa_@HoodBiology Keep in mind, it has nothing to do with people believing differently. I can't change reality.
Lots of people believe lots of crazy shit. Do you agree with all of them as long as enough of them feel that way?
@DataDrivenEm0@Cotalpa_@HoodBiology The vast majority of bi people believe that simply designating yourself something different makes it so?
And yet somehow you believe I'm the one who needs the mental health? I'm confused here. And rightfully so.
Your entire argument is based on emotion. Mine isn't π€·
@DataDrivenEm0@Cotalpa_@HoodBiology Again, and maybe I didn't say this clearly, but if your version is the correct version, then the response "it's OK, I'm bi" makes no sense.
See, I'm more than happy to refer to her as a her if that's what she wants to be called, but I'm not going to pretend that changes biology.
@sl33pyr3i@HoodBiology That wouldn't change the underlying words.
"It's OK, I'm bisexual" is the statement someone would make when they discover the deception, not when they realize they are still gay, still with a dude.
The words don't work like that
@DataDrivenEm0@Cotalpa_@HoodBiology That makes no sense.
So in your opinion, they were 2 gay dudes, one said "I'm trans" and the other said "don't worry, I also like girls"?
See how that makes no sense? Plus he would still just be gay. Which is fine, but at least accurate