@BOGbadams @Myfutrestartsnw Does this means the man on his kneels is the owner of the land, while the kabiyesi is using ibile to grab the land?
O toju su mi o
I hope this man will not loose his life
@KaneTrain6 Thanks for your response and explanation.
That is psycological or emotional violence being perpetrated by the woman
He should have sought for help instead of commiting 1st degree murder by shooting/ killing her.
#saynotodomesticviolence#adoptpeace#conflictresolution
this happened at Orange County Florida USA on the 26th of August 2023 where a man named Hassan Adeyemo shot his wife during an heated argument. When the security personel gets there, the wife was found dead and thehusband has been arrested to face a charge of 1st degree murder
Why does't she leave?
Because of our cultural beliefs and norms, that women must remain in marriage at all cost, and that men must use force and power to control women.
Because she doesn't want to leave the children and may not survive alone etc.
#domesticviolence#awareness
Long post #domesticviolence
Wʜʏ ᴅᴏᴇsɴ’ᴛ sʜᴇ ʟᴇᴀᴠᴇ?
Because he has her so brainwashed that it’s all her fault and that she’s no good to anyone and no one will want her or love her and there’s no way she can possibly make it on her own.
Wʜʏ ᴅᴏᴇsɴ’ᴛ sʜᴇ ʟᴇᴀᴠᴇ?
Because she thinks that if she just tries harder and if she’s a better wife and a better mom that maybe he will be happy with her and he wouldn’t get so angry with her. And maybe he will be the same sweet, charming man that he was when they first met.
Wʜʏ ᴅᴏᴇsɴ’ᴛ sʜᴇ ʟᴇᴀᴠᴇ?
Because he has her convinced that if she tries he will hurt or kill her or her family. Because he has threatened to tell the judge that she is a bad mom and will take away her kids and she will never see them again. Because he has taken away her money and convinced her that she has no good job qualities to make it on her own financially and she will always need him.
More people are concerned with why women stay in abusive relationships than why men are abusing women. Unless you’ve been in an abusive relationship people have no idea how hard it is to escape. Abusers are able to fool those outside the home because they usually only abuse those inside the home.
They need your support.
They need your love.
They do not need your judgement.
Let’s raise awareness
#loveshouldnthurt #SurvivorStrong #EndTheSilenceOnDomesticViolence
#shared
Take a look at the pictorial expression bellow, it is usually used when praying among Yorubas. Yoruba dun lede.
Someone should tell us the meaning in Yoruba
@IamTommivill@AdejokeEwaede@AKakanfo#YorubaProverbs
I wrote this on the 15th day of July, 2023 on a different platform.
-------------
This tweet in the attached screenshot gave me a clue to understand that section 134(2) better now.
Having 25% of votes in FCT is not compulsory. I will explain.
Nigeria has 36 states and a Federal Capital Territory.
The FCT has only six LGA and never considered as a state. It does not have the same status as a state of the Federation.
Now, let's visualize a Venn diagram or a Set in Maths.
A = the 36 states of Nigeria
B = FCT
A = {Abia, Anambra, ...., Zamfara}
B = {FCT}
A U B = {Abia, Anambra, Ebonyi, Edo, Enugu, FCT, ..., Zamfara}
A U B = A union B
Section 134(2)
The candidate must have 25% of votes in 24 states out of the 36 states of the Federation and the FCT.
If only FCT was regarded as a state, the exclusive emphasis placed on it with the conjunction "and" would not have been considered.
Having not regarded FCT as a state, the constitution can not say, "25% of votes in 24 states out of the 37 states.", so it says "25% of votes in 24 states out of all states and the FCT"
Now, we would use Set Union and then a random sampling of 24 states out of the 36 states, and FCT.
After the union, you would get a new set, I will call it C.
A U B = C
C = {Abia, Anambra, Delta, Ebonyi, Edo, Enugu, FCT, Gombe, ..., Zamfara}
There are now 37 elements inside set C.
States and the FCT make up the 37 elements.
A candidate must have 25% of votes in 24 items in set C.
So a candidate can get 25% of votes in 24 items in set C, it doesn't matter whether the 24 items include FCT or not. As long as the states he got 25% are up to 24, then he's good to go.
Whether he gets 25% in 23 states and the FCT, he is also good to go because by their union, they've become of equal status - states.
I hope you understand now?
Greetings to you from the other side sir,
While I respect your opinion, I really do not agree with you sir.
Having been following the election process and the tribunal proceedings, studied the cross-examination and defences, the 1999 constitution, the Electoral Act, 2011 and the Evidence Act, 2011; I am convinced that the judgment delivered by the tribunal Justices was very much in order.
Sir, how can the PDP Lawyer, Enahoro present an evidence, the alleged Guinean passport of Tinubu and when asked its authenticity, he said he got it from the internet. Sir, does this make sense?
How can a lawyer not know how to verify the authenticity of documents? Was it not to be confirmed by the custodian of the document?
Now imagine LP presented a case of 18,088 blurred copies they printed from IREV portal. What happened to the duplicate hardcopies given to their agents at the PUs? According to section 93 of our Electoral Act, 2022; what were the procedures outlined for the collation of results by INEC?
How can LP Lawyers be talking about blurred IREV copies which were secondary data when we have the CTCs, and their agents, their duplicate hardcopies?
Is it the issue of 25% votes in FCT?
The constitution takes precedence over the Electoral Act and based on section 134(2) of the 1999 constitution, FCT was given the status of a state and no special treatment for its voters. Scoring 25% of votes in at least 24 states out of 37 states was in order as that was the interquartile range, and the standard deviation which represent the national spread of the voting population.
In terms of rigging, yes, there was rigging but how substantial enough was the amount of rigging recorded?
Honestly, it's not substantial enough to call for the cancellation of the election.
In every investigation process, it is necessary for us to give room for anomaly, this room is called the margin of error and this determines the confidence interval of the investigation and relates to the doctrine of substantial compliance.
I have been reading your column, 'Pendulum' on ThisDay news platform for over 12 years and I see you as an enlightened man. I also used to go through your Ovation magazines back in the day, your effort is greatly acknowledged.
It is based on this, I decided to take my time to write this so you would also see things from the other perspectives.
I was proud of the judgment given by the Tribunal and I believe it's logical enough.