BigDaddySunshine

Old School

[JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦 @JayGenXer]

Some people are cheering
like Canada just won something.

Dr. Ian Lee just explained
why that cheer is expensive.

The new 50 percent hit
is a slice of the economy.
About five percent of what we sell south.

That slice still gets crushed.
No American buyer pays a 50 percent premium
when they can shop somewhere else.
Small and mid-sized shops get cut off.
Workers get laid off.
Then the plant looks at Indiana.

The bigger fear is not hockey sticks.
It is CUSMA.

If this round went this badly,
the next fight is the whole agreement.
That is the majority of what this country sells.

Walking away was a decision.
Robots did not make it.
Carney’s team did.

Then Ottawa answers with
dollar-for-dollar tariffs
that Canadians pay at the till.

That is not punching Trump.
That is taxing ourselves
and calling it strength.

$32 trillion economy.
$2 trillion economy.
Our total exports south
are a rounding error on their GDP.

You do not bring that customer
to its knees.
You lose the customer
and keep the bill.

Get back to the table
before five percent
turns into the whole store.

#cdnpoli #CanadaFirst

[Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil @ivan_8848]

🚨Piers Morgan Has Received Totally 100% Real and Accurate Lesson in Geopolitical History From Jeffrey Sachs

🚨Piers should be congratulated for allowing someone who has something knowledgeable to say to say it.

🚨ENJOY!!!

📑To my mind, this is overwhelmingly about the first issue, is about NATO, because that's been the issue on the table for 30 years.
Territory was not on the table until two years ago.
I think the non-negotiable parts of what Putin is saying,
I would guess really non-negotiable, so we have to think about them, is that NATO will not enlarge to Ukraine,
and I think Crimea is non-negotiable for, Russia's, core security, interests and perceptions and, history.
So I think what's really absolutely core to what President Putin is saying is he would like to stop the war.
🚨He doesn't wanna take over Ukraine.
He doesn't wanna take more of Ukraine.
But what I do think is at the core of this all along was Russia, throughout its history, has always believed in keeping some safety from the West, which has repeatedly invaded, Russia.
And after the end of the Soviet Union in 1991, the US and Germany had said to Gorbachev and to Yeltsin,
🚨"We won't expand NATO one inch eastward."
But then, like always with the United States, they, they lied, they cheated, and they started the expansion.
And then, the Russians, I was, observing this all along.
The first expansions, which were in Central Europe,
didn't come too close to Russia, and they said, "Ugh, we don't like that.
You cheated. You told us no."
But okay, that's Hungary, Poland, and Czech Republic.
That was 1999 under Clinton.
But then it just kept coming and kept coming and kept coming, and they said with rising decibels, and, rising fervor, "Stop coming closer."
And their ultimate red line has been consistent.
It is Ukraine and Georgia.
Why?
🚨 Well, it, it goes back, Piers, to, the British Empire
to, 1853 to 1856, actually to Lord Palmerston.
He had an idea.
🚨Surround Russia in the Black Sea.
🚨Render Russia's fleet in the Black Sea in Sevastopol, which was there in 1853 just like it's, there in 2024.
Render it essentially inoperable.
Control the Dardanelles.
This is a long story.
And, then Russia is a second or third-rate power.
And President Putin is responding to what has been
a British, imperial attempt for, 175 years and a US attempt since 1991, basically to surround Russia with NATO.
And what Putin has been saying is,
"Don't do that. Stop. Leave, Ukraine as a kind of buffer zone."
And Ukraine was perfectly happy with that, and public opinion was perfectly happy with that, and they didn't wanna join NATO.
And in 2009, they elected Viktor Yanukovych, who promised them neutrality, which was the promise that
Ukraine itself had made in declaring its independence,
that they would be permanently a neutral country.
Cause they're in between West and East.
They're in between Europe and Western Europe or European Union and Russia.
So they wanted just, "Okay, we'll be, we'll be neutral."
But then the United States did team up to overthrow Yanukovych in February 2014, and that's when this war started.
That's when Russia, stopped saying, "Well, we'll lease a base in Crimea.
Rather, we'll take back Crimea.
We don't want it to fall into NATO hands," just like, the Tsar did not want, Sevastopol to fall into Palmerston's hands.
So this is basically a long, long story.
I think the rest is negotiable.
I basically think either the US and Europe don't understand what they're doing, which is not impossible,
or they're still on what has been a 30-year neocon agenda, which I know about in detail, which is get NATO all the way to surround Russia, because that was the plan of Zbigniew Brzezinski and Dick Cheney and others going right back to the 1990s.
They still wanna do it, and they think they can still accomplish this.
Okay.

That's where I find your, I wouldn't say trust, I don't think that's the right word, but you seem very reliant on accepting Putin's worldview rather than perhaps the stark reality of the barbarism with which he's executed this war.
🚨Yeah, maybe because I know too much about the United States.
Because the first war in Europe after world War two was the US bombing of Belgrade for 78 days to change borders of a european state.
🚨The idea was to break Serbia, to create Kosovo as an enclave, and then to install Bondsteel, which is the largest NATO base in the Balkans, in the southwest Balkans.
So the US started this under Clinton, that we will
break the borders, we will illegally bomb another country.
We didn't have any UN authority.
This was a, quote, NATO mission to do that.
Then I know the United States went to war repeatedly,
illegally, in what it did in Afghanistan and then what
it did in Iraq and then what it did in Syria, which was the Obama administration, especially Obama and Hillary
Clinton, tasking the CIA to overthrow Bashar al Assad.
And then what it did with NATO illegally bombing Libya to topple Muammar Gaddafi and then what it did in Kiev in February 2014.
I happened to see some of that with my own eyes.
The US overthrew Yanukovych together with right wing ukrainian military forces.
We overthrew a president.
And what's interesting, by the way, is we overthrew
Yanukovych the day after the European Union representatives had reached an agreement with Yanukovych to have early elections, a government of national unity and a stand down of both sides that was agreed.
The next thing that happens is the opposition, quote unquote, says, we don't agree.
They stormed the government buildings and they deposed Yanukovych.
And within hours, the United States says, yes, we support the new government.
It didn't say, oh, we had an agreement that's unconstitutional what you did.
So we overthrew a government contrary to a
promise that the European Union had made.
And by the way, Russia, the United States,
and the EU were parties to that agreement.
And the United States an
hour afterwards backed the coup.
Okay, so everyone's got a little bit to answer for.
In 2015, the Russians did not say, we want the Donbas back.
They said, peace should come through negotiations.
And negotiations between the ethnic Russians in the
east of Ukraine and this new regime in Kiev led to the Minsk II agreement.
The Minsk II agreement was voted by the UN Security Council unanimously.
It was signed by the government of Ukraine.
It was guaranteed explicitly by Germany and France.
And you know what?
And it's been explained to me in person.
It was laughed at inside the us government.
This is after the UN Security Council unanimously accepted it.
The Ukrainian said, we don't want to give autonomy to the region.
Oh, but that's part of the treaty.
The US told them, don't worry about it.
Angela Merkel explained in Die Zeit in a notorious interview after the 2022 escalation.
She said, oh, you know, we knew that Minsk two was just a holding pattern to give Ukraine time to build its strength.
No, Minsk too was a UN security council unanimously
adopted treaty that was supposed to end the war.
So when it comes to who's trustworthy, who to believe
and so forth, I guess my problem, Piers, is I know the United States government, I know it very well.
I don't trust them for a moment.
I want these two sides actually to sit down in front
of the whole world and say, these are the terms.
Then the world can judge, because we could get
on paper clearly for both sides of the world, we're not going to overthrow governments anymore.
The United States needs to say, we accept this agreement.
The United States needs to say, Russia needs to say,
we're not stepping 1ft farther than whatever the boundary is actually reached and NATO's not going to enlarge.

[Mr. Pool @looP_rM_3117211]

😱SHOCKING: MASSIVE TESTS FUNDED BY THE US GOVERNMENT SHOWED SATURATED FATS AND CHOLESTEROL DO NOT CAUSE HEART DISEASE, BUT THEY HIDDEN THE DATA!

NINA TEICHOLZ, PHD UNCOVERS THE TRUTH... DECREASING CHOLESTEROL ACTUALLY RAISED MORTALITY IN MEN!

- The Minnesota Coronary Experiment (9,000 participants, 4.5 years): For every 30 mg/dL reduction in cholesterol, the risk of all-cause mortality increased by 22%.
The lower their cholesterol, the higher the chance of dying of a heart attack for men. Buried for 16 years! [Analysis of recovered data]

- Sydney Diet Heart Study (458 men, 5 years): Replacing saturated fats with vegetable oils increased heart disease death rate by 62% and all-cause death rate by 70%. Raw data, unpublished, revealed the dangers of seed oils.

- Low LDL and Stroke Risk (Kailuan Study, 96,043 subjects, 9 years of follow-up): LDL < 70 mg/dL was associated with a 65%-169% increase in risk of hemorrhagic stroke. In particular: <50 mg/dL = 2.69-fold increased risk; 50-69 mg/dL = 1.65-fold increased risk. This correlation was further confirmed by a meta-analysis of 476,173 people in all ethnicities.

- High LDL & Longevity (Systematic Review, 19 studies, > 6 million participants) High LDL-C was associated with equal or greater longevity in most cohorts. Inverse association with mortality in old age; no association with shortened lifespan. This counters statin myths.

Saturated fats and cholesterol are necessary for health:
- They help absorb vitamins A, D, E and K
- Promote digestion and bile acids
- boosting immunity against infections, bacteria and viruses
- lower the risk of cancer, depression and suicide
- Brain essential (30% cholesterol, 60% fat)
- Help prevent osteoporosis, strokes and dementia
- Lower all-cause mortality and protect against toxins

Avoid toxic seed oils such as soy, corn, and canola. They cause oxidation and inflammation. Switch to heart-healthy fats: butter, ghee, tallow, lard, goose fat, virgin coconut oil.

[BigDaddySunshine @DaddySunsh12]

🤣🤣

[BigDaddySunshine @DaddySunsh12]

@elonmusk 🤣🤣

[ReadMaxx @ReadMaxx_]

How fast can you read?

[BigDaddySunshine @DaddySunsh12]

Well Done 😎👍🏼

[Lara Logan @laralogan]

Good God. This is murder.

[Dante Rossi @tvc1five]

Trudeau deliberately flooded Canada with immigrants and exploded welfare spending to overload and shatter public services, executing the Cloward-Piven crisis scheme for radical redistribution.

🚨Mark Carney now drives this catastrophic sabotage even harder.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Have a listen.
⬇️⬇️

[Dr. Simone Gold @drsimonegold]

July 2020. Steps of the Supreme Court. America’s Frontline Doctors stood in white coats and told the American people the truth the regime did not want spoken:

COVID was treatable.

Early treatment worked.

Nobody needed to die.

Lockdowns were never necessary.

We were censored within hours. Facebook, Twitter, YouTube erased the video. Careers were destroyed. Doctors were threatened. Patients were denied the medicine that could have saved them.

They called us dangerous.

They were the danger.

History has already rendered its verdict. We were right. They lied. And the people paid the price in lives, liberty, and lost years.

Watch it. Share it. Bookmark it.

Never let them memory-hole what they did.

The truth was never the threat.

Their power was.

[Nicolas Hulscher, MPH @NicHulscher]

We sent our 52-page autism study directly to RFK Jr...

Days later, the CDC changed its website to say: “The claim ‘vaccines do not cause autism’ is NOT an evidence-based claim.”

The 30-year lie that “vaccines don’t cause autism” has officially been TERMINATED.

Our peer-reviewed study found 79% (107 of 136) of vaccine-related studies showed a POSITIVE LINK to autism, neurodevelopmental disorders, and/or brain damage.

Autism prevalence skyrocketed 32,000% as vaccine makers obtained full liability protection and the vaccine schedule grew to 72 doses.

[BigDaddySunshine @DaddySunsh12]

@WestJet I’m trying to cancel my rescheduled flight. The online portal is closed. I’m calling now with a 5hour wait time.