@mstrYoda_ Giriş ve orta seviyesi öldü spesifik çalışmalar daha da değerlenecek. Yapay zeka her işi yapar kopyalar çalışma mantığı böyle veriyle besleniyor.
@MrTradeer Maaşlar yeterli ancak finans erişimi kısıtlı. Birikim yapamazsın ki fiyatlar artıyor reel olarak enflasyona sürekli eziliyorsun. Barınma ihtiyacı gideri çok fazla, ancak dediğiniz doğru alim gücü artmış ancak kısıtlanmış. Alim gücü kiraya vb yeni açılan ihtiyaçlara gitmiş.
Nice to wrap up another profitable quarter.
Q4 was exceptional. I barely traded in Q1, and Q2 has been another strong period.
On my crypto perps account I started in September 2025* is now up around 72%, with a maximum peak-to-trough drawdown of 11%.
Its not flashy, but steady honest work, me against myself... earning the right to scale up the account size.
There are periods where it's more valuable to step away from the screens, appreciate the account growth, and focus on refining the process rather than forcing trades. Some of the biggest improvements come from taking a step back, and Q3 is another opportunity to do some of the deeper internal work which many neglect.
The 11% drawdown is the one metric I'm not entirely satisfied with, although it was largely a result of deliberately increasing size around higher-timeframe inflection points. Those multi-week swing opportunities naturally produce a different risk profile to my shorter-term intraweek rotational trading where I risk below 1%. By comparison, Q4's maximum drawdown was just over 3%.
Over the past few months I've identified several additional execution filters that should improve a couple of my strategies, while reducing my overall playbook to just five. Fewer strategies. Better execution.
One thing I've said for a some time now is that a strategy and its execution are two key components in the game of trading.
Anyone can define a playbook of setups. The real edge lies in how those setups are executed, entries, sizing, scaling, risk management, exits, and equally important, knowing when not to trade. Those subtleties are where variance is reduced and consistency is built vs how much asymmetry you're giving away due to poor execution
The next stage of my own development is moving towards a more hybrid approach.
I still want discretionary judgement around execution, but trade selection, position management and profit-taking will become increasingly systematic and where possible, automated. Dynamic stop management is an area I'm particularly interested in developing further.
Another habit I've adopted is periodically resetting both my journal and my datasets. Markets evolve, and historical data gradually loses relevance as your process changes. Every meaningful refinement should be measured going forward, not against a static snapshot from years ago.
I've never been a fan of most off-the-shelf trading journals. They tend to collect data without producing meaningful insight.
Building your own framework forces you to ask better questions, track the metrics that actually matter, and develop a far deeper understanding of your own decision-making process - partially thanks to claude code, codex (quite fun tbh).
Looking back over the last year, I'm pleased with the returns. But more importantly, the process feels increasingly repeatable. I understand my own game better than I ever have, and that gives me far more confidence than any individual quarter's P&L.
Ultimately the reminder is - one bad trade is all it takes to undo soo much of the hard work - I refuse to let that happen.... Survival is everything as is being a good loser.
@NikkiSixx_7 20 veya 50 farketmez ama fırsat oluşturabilir. Çok kez ethereumdan daha iyi fırsat verip reel açıdan kazandırdı. Eğer haftalıkta bullish trend momentumu görülürse fiyat farketmeksizin dahil olmak lazım. Kurumsal yarısını da kazanacağını düşünüyorum ethereum yapamayacak.