Nobody

[Nobody @DaegnuPark]

@DiscussingFilm Officially not watching it.

[Nobody @DaegnuPark]

@mountaingadfly @PleasantBanter2 @BarbMcQuade The executive executes the laws passed by Congress. The law says that agency heads, while acting on behalf of the Executive branch, can only be fired for cause. SCOTUS said the executive doesn't have to follow the law as laid out. SCOTUS dreamt up constitutional powers.

[Nobody @DaegnuPark]

@robloxmaster589 She looks like Soyeon's daughter

[Nobody @DaegnuPark]

@tommy_pane @BarbMcQuade These agency heads are all term limited, nominated by the President and approved by Congress. Who the fuck else is making these decisions BUT the electorate?

[Nobody @DaegnuPark]

@PleasantBanter2 @BarbMcQuade Are you fucking stupid? Lack of reading comprehension must be high on your list of mental deficiencies. They CAN be fired but ONLY for cause. SCOTUS just said you can fire them for any reason. Purple tie? Fired. Brown skin? Fired.

[Nobody @DaegnuPark]

@CNN GOOD!!!

[Nobody @DaegnuPark]

@Phillyvol85 @benryanwriter holy shit.... no they have term limits as outlined in federal law. All federal agency heads have term limits. They are nominated by the President and then approved by the Senate. Only federal judges have life time appointments. Did you skip Civics class?

[Nobody @DaegnuPark]

@SaltWater651 @benryanwriter They are nominated, reviewed and approved through acts of congress. Nominated by the President, who is elected. Approved by Congress, who is also elected.

[Nobody @DaegnuPark]

@AbieRubin @benryanwriter They can be fired for SPECIFIC REASONS as outlined in the law concerning how the FTC is run. SCOTUS just said they can fire any agency head for any reason whatsoever. Don't like his red shirt? Fired. That's absolutely fucking crazy and creates a nightmare for any company.

[Nobody @DaegnuPark]

@ZAC551229 @benryanwriter What? Congress makes laws. The FTC was created under a law passed by Congress. The president executes those laws. If the law says the commission is to be served and executed in a specified manner, it should be executed as such.

[Nobody @DaegnuPark]

@diigiitalangel @moderato000 @PopEmpirex Today is the only time I've responded to these things because of the dust up from recent events. I've followed this since it started back in 2024. New Jeans has done nothing to offset the damage they've done to themselves and other groups. It's astonishing really.

[Nobody @DaegnuPark]

@SnugglesOG @CatrineMeoww @Hai4RT @PopEmpirex No it wasn't criminal but she still pursued solo activities despite the possibility of the contract being valid. You can't pretend the contract is invalid, pursue activities that breached your contract then act surprised when you're held accountable. It's absurd.

[Nobody @DaegnuPark]

@moderato000 @haerinhour @PopEmpirex No you're just burying your head in the sand trying to convince yourself there's some hard hitting legal gotcha waiting to be discovered by NewJeans lawyers but it's not going to happen. They had their chance to present evidence to terminate their contract and failed.

[Nobody @DaegnuPark]

@SearchPlzz This is for the soccer match or the live after that?

[Nobody @DaegnuPark]

@bluejeanznj No they didn't. They knew they had a slim to 0 chance of it being picked up by the higher appellate court for review and it would drag out the case longer with the same result.

[Nobody @DaegnuPark]

@diigiitalangel @moderato000 @PopEmpirex It's self-inflicted misery. I have so much less empathy for people who do stupid things then play victim.

[Nobody @DaegnuPark]

@dilrhubarb Being late is a choice 90% of the time. Don't pretend it is not. If you are late more than 10% of the time, you have an issue with holding yourself accountable to commitments you agreed to. Thus it is disrespectful and a moral failing.

[Nobody @DaegnuPark]

@Snper22 Good!

[Nobody @DaegnuPark]

@PoppyKPoppie Ador discovered additional information after the court validated the exclusive contract.

[Nobody @DaegnuPark]

@LoveStarzz1 Are you brain dead? Ador has already stated this contract termination is due to facts they discovered about Danielle and company AFTER the court validated their exclusive contract.