The busiest weekend VAR has seen in the Premier League? Probably.
But how many errors is the Key Match Incidents Panel likely to find?
BBC Sport picks out the 11 most contentious incidents, runs through each and weighs up how the KMI Panel may vote.
👇
https://t.co/lqXw9qLgkh
@_u__s__u___@GINGER_ROCKET99 It was to objectively analyae and explain how holding is interpreted by officials, and why the VAR might not intervene in a situation such as this.
Liverpool should have been awarded a penalty against Arsenal after Alexander Isak was pulled back by Jurrien Timber, the Premier League's KMI Panel has ruled.
The KMI Panel produced a split 3:2 vote that the VAR should have intervened.
👇
https://t.co/br0ZF7Zk6q
@johnbungle@Terry_Fowler@BobbyManzi The news story is the report.
The words of the regulatory commission are most definitely damning.
And yes, the appeal could potentially be considered frivolous under the old interpretation.
Damning comments by the FA's regulatory commission on Jean-Philippe Mateta's failed red card appeal.
States that Spurs defender Micky van de Ven was "fortunate not to have suffered a debilitating injury".
Appeal unanimously rejected on all grounds.
👇
https://t.co/RjxSSgY0OH
@dearglfc It's illogical to say a 3:2 vote, the closest possible outcome, is "more clear cut than you'll admit".
I explained last week, in detail, why this decision was far more complicated and nuanced than the simple hold of the shirt.
And the 3:2 vote proves it.
@dearglfc Two points for you.
1) Added this tweet because many people asked how two people voted no penalty
2) KMI Panel sheet doesn't say anything so detailed in support of the penalty
Oh, and
3) 3:2 is as subjective as it gets. I explained last week why this was not straightforward.
@Phillyconcarne This article is about the Football Association regulatory commission, which Palace appealed to.
It has nothing to do with the KMI Panel.
@nidger@briandunne75@KayLFC05_ It's the actual interpretation of the rule, not mine, hence the comments of the KMI Panel today about the difficultly assessing impact.