Dan Abrams

Host, @OfficialOPLive @ReelzChannel; Chief Legal @ABC; Host, @DanAbramsSXM @SXMPOTUS; Founder @Mediaite @LawCrimeNetwork @_TheDailyPour

[Dan Abrams @danabrams]

#OPLive

[Dan Abrams @danabrams]

I’ve long said that #DollyParton is the single most popular, non-controversial celebrity in America. Love all of the thoughts and heartfelt remembrances but there are also a bunch of high profile grifters trying to get in on the goodwill.

[Dan Abrams @danabrams]

Wild story on Dan Sullivan, Dan Sullivan and now Dan Sullivan https://t.co/6yoozQJSHx

[Dan Abrams @danabrams]

Thank goodness the Post has an advice columnist who can answer questions so many Americans can relate to.

[The Washington Post @washingtonpost]

My daughter is in a polyamorous relationship with a married couple who are trying to have a baby. She plans to adopt the baby as a “third parent.” I don’t like the man and am worried for her. Should I intervene?

Advice columnist Carolyn Hax weighs in.

Read more: https://t.co/YPudHxii2y

[Dan Abrams @danabrams]

Eight K9s in the field tonight and two live in Studio (one robotic!) #OPLive. #K9Nights

[Dan Abrams @danabrams]

When @MichaelCohen212 said on my @DanAbramsSXM show that he expected/hoped to interview Trump, I laughed. Well it looks like he gets the last laugh. . . https://t.co/DAISGTz1Jg

[John Kasich @JohnKasich]

Are Americans losing confidence in the U.S. Supreme Court? If so, why?

Hear what @DanAbrams had to say about this and other important issues facing our country.

Tune in to The John Kasich Show on @SiriusXM POTUS Ch 124 this Saturday at 11AM ET with replays on Sunday at 9AM and 1PM ET!

[Dan Abrams @danabrams]

https://t.co/11x9e8VlTD

[Dan Abrams @danabrams]

Some faces you may know. #OPLive

[Dan Abrams @danabrams]

Look who’s back! #OPLive

[Dan Abrams @danabrams]

I do think there is a real possibility that Mangione tries to play some games here with the “guilty plea” to just make a speech in court.

[Good Morning America @GMA]

.@ABC News Chief Legal Analyst @danabrams breaks down why Luigi Mangione may agree to plead guilty and what it could mean for his state case.

[Dan Abrams @danabrams]

Scars, Sanity and a Six-Pack coming soon! https://t.co/flr3RjsDJx

[Dan Abrams @danabrams]

NY Mag's 'Habibi City' Issue Oddly Dubs Israel a "Land Mass' https://t.co/y7ErbnULfb

[Dan Abrams @danabrams]

Nolan Wells Friends’ Lawyer: Family Hasn’t Turned Over His Phone. https://t.co/1uYKxS5wbT

[Dan Abrams @danabrams]

We ready?

[Dan Abrams @danabrams]

@zzthejimzz And X is cutting edge? :)

[Dan Abrams @danabrams]

Tonight’s #OPLive officers. (I’m putting up on Facebook first these days so please follow me there too!)

[Dan Abrams @danabrams]

Dan Abrams' The Daily Pour Acquires Largest US Rum Festival https://t.co/Ma8WaYHcS4

[Stephen A Smith @stephenasmith]

Busy day today, but I couldn’t let this one go unnoticed.

I sat down with Dan Abrams, founder of @LawCrimeNetwork, to separate fact from speculation in the Nolan Wells case and discuss what the evidence actually tells us.

Watch Now on my main YouTube channel.

[‏ً @heisdenji]

Dan Abrams explains why he disagrees with Ben Crump’s approach

Stephen A. Smith: What about your thoughts as it pertains to the impact civil rights attorney Benjamin Crump and his presence? It could be an Al Sharpton giving the eulogy at the funeral. It could be the family inviting them to ingratiate themselves into the mix in some capacity. What about their presence, if nothing else, and the kind of impact that could have?

Dan Abrams: Well, I don’t think that their presence is going to lead the authorities to be reluctant.I’d judge them more on their actions than their presence.

I’m concerned, I don’t like the fact that Ben Crump is holding press conferences with the families of other young Black men who they claim have been mistreated or ignored in some way by the local authorities. I don’t think that’s helpful in the context of this investigation.

Let’s stick to the facts here, let’s stick to the case here. I get it that the family wants more answers, I do not hold anything they do or say against them for wanting to say, “Hey, I’m not satisfied with what we have so far.”

But when Ben Crump starts bringing in other cases and suggesting implicitly, not explicitly, that this is a racial case, I don’t think that’s helpful. I just don’t.