Dangis

[Fox News @FoxNews]

A UK student's reaction is going viral after Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Britain will ban children younger than 16 from using social media.

During a BBC interview, the student revealed her screen time was nine hours over the weekend. When asked how she'd fill all that extra time without social media, she didn't hesitate: "Stare at a wall."

The deadpan response is quickly becoming one of the most shared reactions to the UK's sweeping new restrictions on children's social media use.

[Arthur MacWaters @ArthurMacwaters]

The problem with most people is that they have never seen real evil

They are soft people who inherited good times, and assume it was always so

Their concept of crime is so soft and sympathetic that they have more pity for criminals than victims.

But real evil - wretched, twisted, soulless evil - is out there.

If the soft people do not wake up, a small number of evil people is all that it takes to destroy vast swaths of all that is good

[Dangis @DangisLT]

@dfirth76 @AndySaxon78 We let them walk away because they carry knives.

[Dangis @DangisLT]

@perkdead @wadevstheworld @KasinoKev777 @mistermotorcity @FastbreakHoops5 Same as if he tried to rescue the ball from going out of bounds but didn't make it.

[Mario Nawfal @MarioNawfal]

🚨🇬🇧UK NEWS FOCUS: RACISM VS GROOMING GANGS

From 2011 to 2025, UK newspapers mentioned “racism” a staggering 382,069 times, while “grooming gang” barely scraped by with 4,659 mentions.

To put it another way, “racism” got 82 times the attention. Apparently, the media had other priorities.

Even “white privilege,” not exactly dinner-table chatter, managed 6,146 mentions, outpacing the grooming scandal.

“Black Lives Matter” clocked in at 59,338, and “far right” soared with 141,367 mentions—because nothing grabs headlines like a scary buzzword.

Meanwhile, the grooming gang crisis barely registered on the radar.

Source: @AFpost

[Matt Goodwin @GoodwinMJ]

Today, a number of prominent journalists criticised my suggestion that the UK media class has failed to sufficiently cover the rape gangs scandal, which will go down as one of the biggest scandals in our history

So, I decided to take a closer look at the data.

Trust me, you'll want to read until the end

First, the boring bit. How did I do it?

I used something called Lexis, a database researchers use to search content across UK newspapers

Every good researcher out there knows how to use it so they can duplicate my work and check

One of my critics today said my use of "grooming gangs" in my initial numbers was misleading because much of the coverage in UK newspapers uses "grooming gang" not "gangS".

OK then, let's use that

And let's just look at articles that are specifically about this scandal and don't just mention it in passing

What did I find?

Let's look at the years 2011-2025 because before that, even though the rape gangs scandal goes back decades, there was NOTHING in UK media.

Nothing.

They didn't touch it AT ALL --despite widespread rumours pushed by groups like the BNP and EDL

2011 is a crucial year because it's when renegade and HERO Andrew Norfolk, at The Times, started to write the first early pieces, despite abuse & harassment

First, let's look at ALL UK newspapers

In 2011-2025 there were 4,659 articles specifically focused on the "grooming gang" phenomenon

Wow

Sounds a lot right?

Remember the number.

"Grooming gang" = 4,659

But now let's compare that with how much coverage the media class gave to other scandals and terms

"white privilege" = 6,146

"anti-Muslim" = 17,152

"post office" and "horizon" =20,274

"extreme right" = 21,252

"Islamophobia" = 23,461

"Greta Thunberg" = 22,717

"expenses scandal" =25,585

"Stephen Lawrence" = 29,808

"anti-racism" = 34,484

"Windrush" = 35,515

"George Floyd" = 38,824

"Black Lives Matter" = 59,338

"Grenfell" = 71,422

"Britain" and "racism" = 75,693

"Net Zero" = 141,367

"far right" = 231,540

"racism" = 382,069

I could go on.

I think the numbers speak for themselves.

Relative to other scandals and amid a strong liberal bias in parts of the media class, the mass rape of young, working-class white girls & women just wasn't a priority

Yes, there were newspapers that broke the story and pushed it, like the Times in 2011

But even there, the 440 articles built around "grooming gang" between 2011-2025 is dwarfed by, say, the 2,868 on "Islamophobia", the 3,202 on Stephen Lawrence, the 2,603 on George Floyd, or the 5,524 on BLM

My point is not to bash individual newspapers but to say that relative to other race-related stories and debates, the rape gangs scandal --ARGUABLY THE BIGGEST SCANDAL IN OUR HISTORY-- has received very little coverage from the media class

I'd give you the numbers for liberal progressive papers like The Guardian/Observer but frankly they're absurd

Oh ok then

Between 2011 and 2025 the Guardian had 113 articles on the grooming gang phenomenon compared to 3,325 for "Islamophobia"

What about the BBC?

We can look at BBC News 24 and BBC Radio 4

There were 357 specific mentions of the "grooming gang" scandal in BBC News/Radio 4 transcripts

Meanwhile, there were 7,537 for "George Floyd", 3,219 for "Stephen Lawrence", 7,416 for "Black Lives Matter", and 2,259 for "Islamophobia"

You get the picture. I won't keep going

But what I will say is this.

These girls were never a priority in Media Land

Relative to other scandals they were at first ignored and then downplayed

Too many of the middle-class, Oxbridge-educated, socially liberal if not radically woke progressive elites who control the parameters of what they think is our national "debate" routinely steer clear of scandals and issues that violate tightly-controlled taboos around immigration, multiculturalism, "diversity" in all its forms, and which are backed up with alarmist narratives about the "far right" and "Islamophobia" to warn others off from asking difficult questions or challenging the elite consensus in Westminster and London

This HAS to change

As I wrote in my Substack this morning, @elonmusk has done Britain a favour by forcing us to reckon with a truly NATIONAL scandal that has for too long been ignored and pushed to the side by political, media, and cultural elites in wider society

This past week, we have been pushed into a new era in which millions of people up and down this country are either learning about the rape gangs crisis for the first time or hearing shocking new details they did not know before and can scarcely believe

And millions of people are now asking some enormous questions. How did our country let this happen to our children? Why was it overlooked? Why did so many people stay silent? Is it still happening today? What can we do to stop it? Who is pursuing the truth in media? Who is naming and shaming? And why does the UK media class fall over itself when a single American man dies in Minneapolis while seemingly not giving a shit about the thousands of CHILDREN who have been abused, raped and harassed here in Britain?

The people have tuned into this scandal, in other words. They have taken notice and they are watching. The only question now is whether the media class has bothered to notice and will actually get on top of this scandal and push it to front of the agenda or continue to ask ridiculous questions like it did for much of today, deflecting from its glaring failures to instead obsess about Elon Musk.

Find the truth and tell us the truth.

That's your job.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

This is the same media that hid the fact that a quarter million little girls were – still are – being systematically raped by migrant gangs in Britain.

They are beneath contempt. Despicable human beings.

[Jay Anderson @TheProjectUnity]

🚨⚠️WARNING: Nano-Tech Semiconductor Implants Being Found Inside Civilians

Why Would NATO own a frequency being emanated from an implant found in a Spec-Ops operator? But it's not just military operators, civilians are having these implants removed from them as well!

[Crazy Clips @crazyclips_]

This guy spends all his money saving dogs that are up for sale at dog meat markets in Asia

[Michelle Maxwell ™ @MichelleMaxwell]

This should be a wake up call to all parents/grandparents regarding vaccines.

[Julia Hartley-Brewer @JuliaHB1]

I'm on a sun lounger by a pool right now so it's bizarre to learn that I am apparently I'm one of the people being blamed for hundreds of thugs taking to the streets 1,300 miles away in Britain. So here's my response:

Yes, there are genuinely far right racist thugs who are using the Southport stabbings as an excuse for rioting. There are also plenty of louts who just fancy a good summer's night bust-up and an excuse for looting.

But there are also many millions more people - of all races, creeds and classes - who would never dream of throwing a brick or setting a police van on fire but who share SOME (not all) of the concerns of those thugs and louts.

Those millions don't want to "send all immigrants home", they don't care what colour skin someone has or what religion they follow. 

But they DO care about their country, their communities and their nation's culture. They DO care when the political elites import millions of people from very different cultures who fail to integrate and assimilate, or even learn the English language. 

And they DO care when they are told they're racist for stating incontrovertible facts about that mass immigration such as the impact it has had on access to housing, public services, school places, GP appointments and, yes, their own wages. And especially when the elites condemning them keep extolling the joys of multiculturalism while ensuring their own families are protected from those impacts. 

They DO care when they're lumped in with hooligans sporting swastika tattoos simply for voting for Brexit to reassert our national sovereignty and ability to control our borders. And they DO care when the political elites go on to blatantly ignore their concerns and put rocket boosters on immigration levels to record levels.

Most of all, millions of British people care about that fundamental British value of "fair play". They expect everyone to be treated equally - and especially when it comes to law enforcement.

The two-tier treatment of different ethnic and religious communities - and different political causes - by our overly politicised police over the past few years is now so blatant, it's laughable for the media and political elites to continue to try to gaslight an entire nation by denying it. 

So, yes, we should all 100% condemn the violent thugs who go out looking to attack their fellow Brits or anyone they perceive to be an immigrant or the police officers put onto the front line to keep the peace. (As I've done many times on my radio show.)

We should all 100% condemn those who seek to exploit the legitimate concerns of millions of ordinary people to further their bigoted and divisive agendas. (As I've also done many times on my radio show.)

But don't blame the people who've been warning that justifiable fear and anger among millions of ordinary British people about the fast-changing impact of mass immigration could turn Britain into a tinderbox. 

The people first and foremost to blame are the thugs on the streets, of course. But a share of the blame for stirring up these demons must also go to those politicians and commentariat elites who pushed for mass uncontrolled immigration, celebrated differences rather than encouraged integration; who divided people into their religious and ethnic groups rather than promoting unifying British cultural values and beliefs; the people who shouted "racist" and "fascist" at anyone who raised legitimate concerns over the past 20 years, instead of actually tackling the problems that were clearly brewing.

They slowly and deliberately prepared the bonfire over the past 20 years while voters warned them again and again that this would end in tears. 

And now they pretend to be surprised when bad actors come along and strike the match to start the flames burning. 

So they can chase their "likes" on here with their blame games, but it just won't wash anymore. 

Anyway, I'm off for a swim.

[Dangis @DangisLT]

@michal_ptacnik @JoeyCarbstrong Just like I had no idea and don't understand how one has to arrive at a conclusion that "the continued existence of sub-human intelligences is cruelty". If there were no humans at all, then existence = cruelty. I can't make sense of this logic.

[Dangis @DangisLT]

@michal_ptacnik @JoeyCarbstrong And our behaviour towards those we share the planet with. Are we 10 times smarter but lower in numbers than animals? Perhaps. Do we have ability to solve problems relating to under treatment of flora and fauna on Earth? Yes. Are we doing it? Not sincerely.

[Dangis @DangisLT]

@michal_ptacnik @JoeyCarbstrong Assuming that higher civilizations abide by those rules (or they wouldn‘t have achieved such status) we can predict most likely scenarios and even our current situation. Therefore whether we would be doomed or not if proportionally higher beings intervene, depends largely on us.

[Dangis @DangisLT]

@michal_ptacnik @JoeyCarbstrong According to this logic, if a higher level beings (aliens) come to Earth, but humans are unable to request our rights via their methods of communication ie some kind of quantum telepathic messaging protocol then it's ok to kill us? Historically it's been done to native indians.

[Dangis @DangisLT]

@michal_ptacnik @JoeyCarbstrong Do animals have to send you a written request approved by some kind of Council of the Animal Union?
When feeling under threat, our earthly friends fight, kick, scream, cry with all their strength, that's an obvious expression of a desire to live and be free.

[Insane Reality Leaks @InsaneReality]

The creator of McCafee, he was declared dead a shortly after this

[𝐏𝐚ú𝐥 el Vegano @Paul_Vegano]

“Pigs end up drowning in the boiling water tank before they ever bleed to death. They hit the water and start screaming, crying, kicking...” – U.S. Slaughterhouse Worker.

Stop Supporting Animal Cruelty.
GoVegan🌱🌍

#AnimalRights #GoVegan #EndSpeciesism #Vegan #RosesLaw

[Champagne Joshi @JoshWalkos]

Thread 🧵

I know I can be labeled a domestic far right extremist for showing you these studies because they undermine the profits and confidence of your public health establishment but so be it.

Study 1 Link: https://t.co/FbF2djHofg