@donnoh_eth@peter_szilagyi@Zodomo The external source of entropy is assumed though. The question is, how easy is it to disrupt that system. The balance has changed many times on that.
Question to all the people upset about Anthropic adding safeguards to Fable. I think most of you come from a libertarian viewpoint?
But from that perspective, isn't it also Anthropic's right to do whatever they want with their model?
@peter_szilagyi@Zodomo I would bet on the managed transition. Humans are very bad at reacting at short timescales but pretty good adapting over a few years.
@donnoh_eth@peter_szilagyi@Zodomo The second law of thermodynamics applies to closed systems. Biological systems circumvent it by relying on an external energy source to locally reduce entropy and create a world according to their desires.
@donnoh_eth@peter_szilagyi@Zodomo It is also not a fundamental property of the universe that destroying is always easier than defending. But the reality is, we simply don't know what it is going to be at the next frontier.
@Zodomo@peter_szilagyi That's not my point. AI models *could* present similar dangers by allowing computer security exploits. (Whether Fable/Mythos does I'm not sure)