Schools do not improve because leaders are superheroes or the staff are martyrs and saints; they improve when they create systems of effective behaviour, and stick to them. Supervising and maintaining those routines needs to also be a set of systems.
All those people sending students into the corridor, I wonder what magic thing we expect to happen to them. A miraculous conversion? That theyโll sit, like Buddha under the tree until they become enlightened? Theyโll see it as a deterrent? All it does is kick the behaviour can up the road for ten minutes, and when they re-enter, nothing has changed apart from the fact that they are now ten more minutes adrift from the classwork.
Theyโre unsupervised- which is a safeguarding disaster- unoccupied, and now free to caper where their heart takes them. Itโs a Phantom Zone where nothing good happens.
If they need to go, send them somewhere supervised. If they can stay, let them stay. The only reason to use the corridor as a temporary space is if they need a moment to compose themselves privately after an upset, or you want a quiet, immediate word with them away from an audience.
I also use internal truancy as a strong indicator of how well the school runs itself. I once went to a school and counted over 100 kids out of lessons. Every one of the ones I stopped (about 20) had a well prepared excuse, every one of which crumbled under scrutiny. Half of them had passes issued by an adult.
@jesskellynt have you done any review/research on kids gps smart watches. Looking at imoo and xplora and wondering if there is any review done or should I be looking elsewhere