After our daughters were slaughtered in Southport, we protested and were insulted, attacked and demonised.
You came down on us like a ton of bricks, you harassed us in the street with riot gear and had people locked up within weeks.
People died in prison as a result and still unjustly suffer there today.
And this is your response to yet another horrific attack by an Islamic extremist? Asking the protesters nicely to stay at home? After the scenes we saw across the country this week.
You're an utter disgrace - there will be national celebrations when you leave office.
@KemiBadenoch And yet, not one of you have reached out to meet me, the mother of Rhiannon Whyte? Or help me get answers . I really hope Henry's family get the peace they deserve, because I know I won't, yet I've tried so many times.
The luvvies will tell you that people who have been settled here since at least the Iron Age are not indigenous to Britain but a Somalian family who has been here since 2008 is “British” within the same breath - and they'll do so without feeling even a twinge disingenuousness.
@AfcWill10@owenjonesjourno Have you read it? It's bollocks. It redefined racism and we have suffered for it ever since.
The Kent Report found no racist conduct already but it was overturned - why?
The Liberal project is a malign evil which seeks to use "racism" to further its own ends.
Sure, here's some sources:
Sikhs vote overwhelmingly for left wing parties in Britain. The same is true in the US and Canada.
Even as support has fallen for Labour since 2023, it has increased among Greens and Lib Dems.
Sikh support has been conditional on a Sikh Manifesto pledge. In 2024, it included pledges to criminalise “anti-Sikh hate in a similar fashion to Anti-Semitism and Islamophobia”.
It was supported by the Sikh Federation UK — the same one that has released the statements condemning the Nowak family, that people have been praising.
The simultaneous Hindu manifesto, signed by Conservative politicians in 2024, contained commitments to criminalise "microaggressions" as “anti-Hindu hate (Hinduphobia)”, to make it easier for "Religious Workers" and the dependents and elderly parents of Hindus already in the UK to immigrate here, and more funding for Indian language and Hindu schools.
So, the parties have to cater to foreign religions, minority lobbies, and promise liberal immigration policies to win Sikh and Hindu support.
While it may not be the case for your friends, or Hardeep Singh, it is the case that many Sikhs and Hindus in Britain they prioritise whatever advantages their ethnic group over what benefits the British people.
I don't support that. Those who behave that way should leave. And I am happy to ban all immigration from India going forward.
If I might explain why people aren't receptive to this message:
You're appealing for moral consideration to be extended to Sikhs because of your personal good relationships with Sikhs. Likewise, I've met some nice Sikhs. Nothing against those individuals.
However, many people will have seen the clannish behaviour of the Digwa family — common on the Indian Subcontinent, regardless of religion — and conclude there are irreconcilable cultural and ethnic differences there, which led to a young man's murder.
Others will have seen Indians celebrating Henry's death, just as they celebrated the Sikh trucker killing a family with an illegal U-turn on a Florida highway, when they thought that family was white.
They will have seen the special pleading and ethnic lobbying accompanying that celebration: people saying the trucker didn't mean it, it was a mistake, to preserve a system (H-1b visas) which privileges Indians.
The same with Digwa and Henry Nowak. People see the pleading not to blame Sikhs, but notice some Sikh representatives sticking by their own.
The Sikh Press Association that put out a statement from Digwa's family, to garner sympathy for them.
The Sikh representatives who said Digwa "didn't intend" to kill Nowak, which is something they couldn't possibly know, but are just saying to deflect blame from their "community" and preserve their status of legal privileges over natives in our country.
The Sikh politicians making everything about "the far right".
They will see a system which permits and encourages their clannishness, their ethnic chauvanism, but tells us don't look back in anger when our children are killed.
And yes, Sikhs may be a small population relative to Muslims and Hindus. But the majority of Sikhs would side against the British people if they decided to ban all immigration from India to halt and reverse demographic change. Because they would see it is a disadvantage to their ethnic and religious group.
Therefore, they are counted by many among the undifferentiated mass of migrants that are robbing us of a claim to our country.
This makes the question, "Who is Britain for?", a zero sum competition for possession of the country: between the natives, and minorities with a shared interest in preserving a system of laws which privileges them over us.
The individual good character of given Sikhs is beside the point. What people want is for that system of laws to be abolished; for ownership of Britain to be restored to us; for our fate as demographic minorities to be prevented.
And most people think, with good reason, based on the pattern above, that most Sikhs will side against the measures that restore that balance of power, to the British people away from the liberal minorities-first system.
And so any defence of a "community" codes as a commitment to preserving that system, even if that isn't your intention, Tommy.
Those reports are all a load of bollocks created by intellectual Marxists paid to create a narrative to help the liberal system survive and flourish.
Those reports were based on scenarios and experiences. Today there is literal policy that dictates white people are treated with less equity.
The Police Race Action Plan - Improving policing FOR BLACK PEOPLE https://t.co/smZUUF31A7
Axel Rudakabana - born in UK.
Valdo Calocane - legal migrant.
Vickrum Digwa - born in UK.
Reynhard Sinaga - legal migrant.
Ike Ekweremadu - legal migrant.
Nicolae Fratutescu - legal migrant.
Sebastian Maier - legal migrant.
Ovidiu Mamaliga - legal migrant.
Andrei Mamaliga - legal migrant.
Gintas Burinskas - legal migrant.
Lionel Hibbert - legal migrant.
Amere Dhaliwal - born in UK.
Raj Basran - born in UK.
Joel Smith - born in UK.
Gurwinder Singh - legal/born in UK (?)
Cliff Mitchell - Born in UK.
Vincent Oladukun - legal migrant.
Estefanio Goncalves - legal migrant.
Anthony Williams - born in UK.
Caetano Mauricio Vas - legal migrant.
Timitio Noronha - legal migrant.
There are lots more, though with the current news of Henry Nowak, they are hard to find.
All of these were legal, non-Islamic migrants or British-born foreign nationals.
Some people want you to believe that ONLY illegal, Islamic migration is an issue.
Personally, I don’t want to wait and find out if someone is ‘assimilated’ into Britain.
There is nothing systemic that allows or endorses creeps or rapists in the police to prey on women all over the country, otherwise we'd have seen more examples. That doesn't prove it was systemic and I'd like to see proof of that.
It is the opposite in the case of DEI which has led to anti-white policing everywhere. This was a police officer doing his job as intended, whereas Everard was a crime as I've already stated - raping and killing her was not in the job description.