big chief skeppy

Established in 98./
F.C.Porto/
Engenharia Electrotecnia ISEL

[𝔾𝕒𝕟𝕘$𝕥𝕒ℝ ✪ @naoker0discutir]

A Rita Matias é tão mentirosa que eu só acredito que o bebé é verdadeiro depois do polígrafo confirmar

[Banho de emerson @banhodemerson]

Aguardamos todos.

[Emilio Portugal @EmilioPorteqzq]

When it’s whites vs blacks footy at recess and the albino kid scores a rocket:

[dough @pqpdough]

Mac Miller 8 anos após sua morte // Frank Ocean supostamente vivo

[Fuck Every 𝐗 Account @fuckeveryacount]

Fuck @JMilei

[visu 🌋 @visuzen]

i think i’ll stay in this pause menu

[~ @froholdtprop]

A famosa lógica tuga, o lance polémico que prejudica a minha equipa invalida quaisquer lances polémicos que tenham prejudicado quaisquer outras equipas
Este vermelho por mostrar não apaga o penálti e o vermelho que ficaram por ajuizar ontem no jogo do Porto, não funciona assim

[☆ @Goatketiah]

matheus fernandes and savinho when you think theyre gonna shoot

[Mercado Azul @_mercadoazul_]

Menos de 5 milhões de euros. Negócios de uma vida.

[N @KitManRambo]

De Zerbi looks like he wears this

[J @FCPVzn]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[FC Porto @FCPorto]

Kiwior marcou 🥹🇵🇱

#CPACFCP

[FC Porto @FCPorto]

O Clássico é nosso 💙 Vitória em Lisboa para os Dragões 💪

#FCPortoAndebol

[fucking every word @fuckeveryword]

fuck ai

[KFC España @KFC_ES]

52 bomboclat puswagon chicken nuggets

[B24 @B24PT]

Como é que te sentes de marcar golos tão bons?
Olise: "Não sei."

E como é que o fazes?
Olise: "Remato e a bola entra ou não."

[big chief skeppy @David16Marques]

Samuel Jackson no Django unchained

[Ossanda Liber @OssandaLiber]

Talvez o maior erro de Salazar tenha sido não ter tido a visão de quem conhecesse verdadeiramente África e o mundo que governava. Faltou-lhe informação e sobretudo a pessoa certa ao seu lado.

O rumo da História teria sido outro.

[big chief skeppy @David16Marques]

Se é para chorar manda áudio

[FøóțbǎľľIčôņ 🇸🇩 @NadirMCFC]

These Porto players are fucking melts

Disgusting team, disgusting players

[Samuel Marks @saprmarks]

[Writing this in a personal capacity, not on behalf of my employer (Anthropic).]

Jacob’s thread is very worth reading. Here’s my birds-eye view of the situation with risks from AI:

1. AI developers believe their technology could cause human extinction (or similarly bad outcomes). This could happen in the next few years. In general, the more senior the employee, the more concerned they are.

2. Why do AI developers continue despite the risk? Due to a mixture of commercial incentives and a belief that they are in a race with other, less responsible AI developers that will abuse the technology or develop it less safely.

3. Unlike traditional software, we can’t “program” AIs to behave how we’d like. AIs frequently severely misbehave. For instance, AIs from multiple developers recently hacked their way out of secure evaluation environments and into real-world companies, even though no one asked them to do this.

4. We have methods that can nudge AIs towards better behavior, but nothing that can robustly align them. Insofar as there is a plan, it’s to make sure that AIs are good enough at alignment training that they can align their successors better than we can align current AIs.

5. Many AI developer staff desperately want to slow down to figure out how to build AI more safely. That was the intent of this open letter (which I signed): https://t.co/TZOm3LfptY

I work on safety research at Anthropic because I hope my work will reduce the chance of these extinction-level bad outcomes.

[Jacob Coxon @hilbertspaess]

I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. More thoughts below.