@budgetcookinguk@cleanupbritain@benonwine Not necessarily true. On an iPhone for example it depends if you were using rear or front camera. Front camera is mirrored. Here’s two videos, both using my left hand to push cup away. Front camera flips everything, although cup still moving away. ChatGPT gives explanation.
@nazirafzal Competence, Accountability and the Quality of Your Services can vastly improve with change. Councils are deeply embedded in day-to-day ops and become so familiar with existing processes that inefficiencies and blind spots start to feel “normal.” A fresh perspective is good.
@KemiBadenoch@ElaineM00418402 He’s willfully ignorant. Cherry picking what comes across his desk so he can preserve deniability. He never wanted to know the outcome of DV vetting because that compromises him. Deny and scapegoat others. A reoccurring theme to his premiership it seems.
@piersmorgan@Newbie721 His ignorance allows him to preserve deniability. The truth is he never wanted to know the outcome of DV because that compromises him. He’s cherry picking what comes across his desk, so he can scapegoat others and continue this process of denial. A reoccurring theme it appears.
@PolitlcsUK@GoodKingLou Angry that he keeps being exposed as wilfully ignorant. But it’s by design. Picking and choosing what comes across his desk allows him to preserve deniability. Later he will deny knowledge. But he never wanted to know the vetting outcome because that compromises him.
@PolitlcsUK He’s wilfully ignorant. He never wanted to know the outcome of the vetting because it preserves deniability. He chooses what comes across his desk, so he can play the denial card. It’s by design, clinging to power and scapegoat others. There’s a pattern to his behaviour.
@afneil@BritishSacred It’s clear the PM is willfully ignorant. He chooses what matters come across his desk, because this allows him to preserve deniability. We’ve seen time and time again, it’s others who are the issue. He never wanted to know the vetting outcome, so never asked. It’s by design.
@PeterStefanovi2 Willful ignorance comes to mind with Starmer. It’s no coincidence that matters don’t cross his desk because that’s his preference, it allows him to preserve deniability. There’s a pattern with his behaviour - deny knowledge and responsibility. It’s all by design.
@PeterBleksley@Cristin24597672@metpoliceuk For 25yrs, the recruitment has fundamentally been watered down to aid in the selection of less competent personnel. Whether that be lower fitness test standards, written or verbal reasoning. The issue is not enough bright individuals want to join the job, so standards relaxed.
@EricDav25@truemagic68 But that’s £42m per annum. Analysts estimate that INEOS alone have paid in the region of £1.25 billion in tax to UK Gov in the last 25 years. So it’s reasonable to say that Radcliffe’s companies have repaid any subsides many times over.
@MartinSLewis Most people are only two pay cheques away from being in the same position. I got talking to a homeless guy last winter and last summer I began to give him some weekly gardening work. My neighbours have chipped in too. The messages he sends me of gratitude are off the scale.
@aNorthernGarden@afneil Of course. Any MP of the PMs choosing could be asked to resign as an MP and take up the role. Also as you say at his disposal are the career diplomats. He chose Mandelson. It just highlights the lack of talent in the Labour Party and in general across the political landscape.