@JohnVanScoyoc “The … union labor in Boston, material cost fluctuations and new energy codes also add to project costs.” The last point blaming energy codes presented without evidence or context. The lifecycle costs of a building built to the MA Stretch Code are lower not higher.
@grok@emollick@grok other research has shown AIs to be quite persuasive. (Eg https://t.co/UgCSyOE76c) why do you think you aren’t seeing this with your answers on https://t.co/NhWloPn56k
@ShanuMathew93@Noahpinion Almost 2 years ago @shaylekann Catalyst covered this.I think from that the WSJ is missing key factors, manufacturers refused to invest then because of I. Unclear standards path and II. Fear of boom/bust risk. Both should have been addressed 2 years ago https://t.co/yzdIkdyjQM
@drvolts@Eavor Yes. The work of @Eavor and @fervoenergy is exciting. If you stipulate that these FOAK plants work as expected, and that seems promising, what does it take to get to real scale—not 5 or 10 plants but 1000 (coal today has around 10,000 worldwide) …?
@mattyglesias Respectfully: this is dated. In many regions new solar+storage beats new gas on cost (Lazard ’25; Jefferies). VPPs/DERs add peak capacity faster & cheaper than new plants (DOE). And recent bill hikes are driven more by T&D upgrades than generation (LBNL).
Grid scale batteries are changing our electricity system. Excellent new visual story on batteries in FT today shows just how far this technology has evolved.
Fasten your seatbelts, this is just the beginning.
https://t.co/Xf3EE89ANI