Leading #Conservative thinker and media commentator; staunch defender of the Constitution and the Founders vision; committed idealist who loves animals.
What Jack Smith Gets Wrong About Immunity
The special prosecutor focuses on then-President Trump’s motives—a critical legal error.
(Wall St Journal op-ed w/ Elizabeth Price Foley)
https://t.co/LZ5Ly8K4Y5
From @WSJopinion: Jack Smith focuses on then-President Trump’s motives—a critical legal error, write @DavidRivkin and Elizabeth Price Foley https://t.co/fp9N09xNvE https://t.co/fp9N09xNvE
From @WSJopinion: Bragg’s prosecution of Trump is plagued by many reversible legal errors, of which the failure to accord pre-emptive force to FECA is the strongest grounds for its reversal on appeal, write @DavidRivkin and Elizabeth Price Foley https://t.co/9cOYiqhzlI
Bragg’s prosecution of Trump is plagued by many reversible legal errors, of which the failure to accord pre-emptive force to FECA is the strongest grounds for its reversal on appeal, write @DavidRivkin and Elizabeth Price Foley
https://t.co/8arhEg3teD
Why Trump’s Conviction Can’t Stand:
It rests on an intent to violate a state law that is pre-empted by the Federal Election Campaign Act.
(op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, w/ Elizabeth Price Foley)
https://t.co/lR9NgzN0Aw
Democrats make clear that if they win, they’ll push measures to destroy the judiciary’s independence.
(op-ed in the Wall Street Journal w/ @andrewmgrossman)
Harris and Schumer Target the Supreme Court
https://t.co/6ixF4RXLQw
Democrats proclaim their devotion to democratic institutions, but their plan for the Supreme Court is an assault on America’s basic constitutional structure, write @DavidRivkin and @andrewmgrossman
https://t.co/HiQRXDc0Kx
Any prosecution of a president based on his official acts harms the presidency’s effectiveness. The court has sent a clear message to prosecutors like Jack Smith, write @DavidRivkin and Elizabeth Price Foley
https://t.co/Fj0prsDKV0
America Depends on Presidential Immunity: Rejecting Trump’s claim would have meant a weaker government and a more politicized justice system.
(op-ed in the WSJ w/ Elizabeth Price Foley)
https://t.co/ycIHEeQnhg
The immunity decision isn’t about Trump so much as it is about protecting the presidency itself; future occupants of that office, including President Biden; and the ability of the government to function, write @DavidRivkin and Elizabeth Price Foley
https://t.co/6pdUwxYkon
Three due-process precepts—notice, meaningful opportunity to defend, and proof of all elements—were absent in Trump’s trial. The Constitution demands that higher courts throw out the verdict against him, write @DavidRivkin and Elizabeth Price Foley
https://t.co/QjX8qN1c0l
Trump, like all criminal defendants, was entitled to due process. The Constitution demands that higher courts throw out the verdict against him, write @DavidRivkin and Elizabeth Price Foley https://t.co/qPfo1QqQ4f
Three due-process precepts—notice, meaningful opportunity to defend, and proof of all elements—were absent in Trump’s trial. The Constitution demands that higher courts throw out the verdict against him, write @DavidRivkin and Elizabeth Price Foley
https://t.co/z8XxaGY8Hi
If the State Department’s criticisms of Israel are serious, they imperil the defense of all civilized countries, write @DavidRivkin and Lee A. Casey
https://t.co/SvbquJejfN
If the State Department’s criticisms of Israel are serious, they imperil the defense of all civilized countries. (op-ed in the Wall Street Journal w/ Lee A. Casey)
https://t.co/dMDVD2HeWc
From @WSJopinion: If the State Department’s criticisms of Israel are serious, they imperil the defense of all civilized countries, write @DavidRivkin and Lee A. Casey https://t.co/DHRhUlYlnS https://t.co/DHRhUlYlnS
And to top it all off, an observation from my friend and colleague @DavidRivkin: "the information he gave to Hur had nothing to do with his tenure as President and involved his private conduct."
Trump’s detractors insist that recognizing presidential immunity would put him above the law. They’re wrong, write @DavidRivkin and Elizabeth Price Foley
https://t.co/WqjriNvAD4
Even if the prospect of conviction is remote, the threat of prosecution impairs the presidency. Imagine how other presidents might have fared if they had to worry about prosecution for official acts, write @DavidRivkin and Elizabeth Price Foley
https://t.co/9JkSUpTXR7
Presidential immunity does not mean presidents are "above the law". There are other ways of holding the president to account -- ways that don't impede their ability to carry out the role.
(op-ed in the Wall Street Journal)
https://t.co/uLxV8CZeIW