Well, would you look at that. I guess Chat doesn't consider the Bible a "sacred text". I am curious if it would have quoted the Quran directly if it had been a more “peaceful” verse, and if it still would have directly quoted the Bible had they been more violent verses.
@bengoertzel I would also think, that the base technology plays a huge role. I am not convinced that LLM AGI (which I don't think is possible) can be made a save thing because of the nature of its intelligence. Your approach sounds very interessting, even I do not really understand it yet.
Its facinating what LLMs can do. But they will never be truly intelligent. This technology will soon reach its absolute limit and be replaced by something structurally very different.
@ZssBecker@FinanceBag Amen. I also believe LLM are sturcturally incapable of true reasoning. Its actually wild they can do what they can do. But real AGI will require a fundamentally different approach.
I love AI. But Everybody who works with AI daily knows: We are far, far away from AGI ...and we might even never reach it with this technology.
Anybody who has had any real spiritual transcendent experice knows: these things are not sentient or conscious in any shape or form.
@alexwg AI is nowhere near AGI. it is ok for some coding and math. it still sucks at text processing, constructs non- sensical sentences, draws idiotic logical conclusions, hallucitates dacts, makes mistakes no 10 year old would make.
@nic_carter Show me one model that can do that. Flawless Code? havent seen it. academic papers? still full of hallucinations.
they still make simple reasoning errors no human would. Agi is definetely not here.
@jimstewartson AI is a great but still very limited computer tool. LLMs can be super productive, but will never be truly intelligent. And for fucks sake they can't and won't ever be conscious.