Prophet Margin

[Prophet Margin @David_F_Snyder]

@swombat @Acyn No conscience, for sure.

[Prophet Margin @David_F_Snyder]

@Acyn Bald like a baby. Bawls like a baby. Talks as sensibly as a baby. Less emotional intelligence than a baby. Such genius.

[Prophet Margin @David_F_Snyder]

@SeanParnellATSD Okay, snowflake. 🙄

[Prophet Margin @David_F_Snyder]

@bkbtower @SecRubio @POTUS You should move to Russia or China where they do it that way. What you state is against the Constitution the Founding Fathers wrote. Or maybe Stalinism is your thing?

[Prophet Margin @David_F_Snyder]

@Freedom93693693 @SecRubio @POTUS @nayibbukele You’re next.

[Prophet Margin @David_F_Snyder]

@SecRubio @POTUS Little Marco has little respect for due process for all. History will not remember you kindly.

[Kasey @Yodaspark1]

@johnson_aaronr @newtgingrich What? Judges rule against presidents all the time this is nothing new.. remember in Bidens administration. The president is not or
Never has been above judges so say what you want you are wrong and are just gaslighting

[Prophet Margin @David_F_Snyder]

@johnson_aaronr @newtgingrich Move to Russia where your fantasy is fact. Here in the USA, the Constitution rules. No kings.

[Prophet Margin @David_F_Snyder]

@mousecrackers @newtgingrich “Soros”. Drink! Get back to reality, d00d.

[Prophet Margin @David_F_Snyder]

@Richard79139714 @newtgingrich Evidence matters, d00d. You should take a civics class once you get to 8th or 9th grade.

[Prophet Margin @David_F_Snyder]

@UnfilteredSW @newtgingrich You should get an education some day.

[Caring Guy💙🇺🇸🌈✌🏻 @caringguy1957]

Bless your heart. This post shows you have no understanding of the role of both district judges and the Supreme Court. Federal district judges are not “abusing their role” when they review executive actions, they are fulfilling their constitutional duty under the principle of judicial review, established in Marbury v. Madison (1803). The judiciary serves as a check on executive power, ensuring that presidential actions comply with the Constitution and federal law. The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) explicitly grants courts the authority to review executive agency decisions, meaning district judges have both the power and responsibility to oversee decisions made by the President of the United States. Their rulings do not constitute an attempt to “overrule” the president but instead ensure that his actions remain lawful.

Your ridiculous assertion that Chief Justice John Roberts should intervene to “overrule” district court decisions reflects your ignoranceg of how the Supreme Court actually operates. The Supreme Court does not act as a supervisory body that can arbitrarily override lower courts. It only hears cases through the appellate process and grants certiorari based on legal significance, not political concerns. The Chief Justice, moreover, does not have unilateral authority to overturn district court rulings; Supreme Court decisions are made collectively by all justices. The idea that the Chief Justice must “defend the Court” by preventing criticism or political backlash is contrary to the principle of judicial independence. The judiciary is meant to function without direct influence from the executive or legislative branches, ensuring an impartial interpretation of the law.

lastly, the claim that district judges should not be able to check presidential authority ignores the separation of powers. Courts have ruled against presidents from both parties, not as a means of political interference but as part of their constitutional duty to interpret the law. If a district court issues an erroneous ruling, the appellate process provides the appropriate mechanism for review, not unilateral intervention by the Supreme Court. Judicial oversight of executive action is not a “power grab” but a foundational element of the U.S. legal system, designed to prevent any one branch from exceeding its constitutional authority.

When did you actually lose your mind?

[Prophet Margin @David_F_Snyder]

@newtgingrich You’re still an ignoramus after all these years. Not surprising.

[Rick Wilson @TheRickWilson]

I favor their complete and unredacted release.

What's the matter, Pam? Seeing the initials "DJT" too often for comfort?

[Kirsten Gillibrand @SenGillibrand]

DOGE is closing nearly 50 Social Security offices across the country — including in White Plains — and now they're limiting phone support.

Make no mistake, this is a full-blown attack on Social Security. Elon Musk is trying to take away benefits you earned.
https://t.co/USn8joBy4p

[scary lawyerguy @scarylawyerguy]

Modern day brownshirts operating on the streets of America and it's getting less attention than the height of the staircase Joe Biden used to get on and off Air Force One

[Cory Booker @CoryBooker]

Elon Musk isn't going to save the government any money. It's the opposite, in fact.

He's currently pursuing a move that could blow a multi-trillion-dollar hole in the federal budget and let billionaires get away with tax evasion.

Here's how 🧵

[Michael McFaul @McFaul]

Such a shocking, insulting statement about an ally from anyone, let alone a senior White House official.

Who told her to say this? She obviously got in from somewhere.

Im hope our @PressSec knows that it's only because of the French that we have an independent United States of America.

[Timothy Snyder @TimothyDSnyder]

So: Russia flatly rejected one Trump envoy (Kellogg), made the next one (Witkoff) wait for eight hours, rejected the ceasefire, and instructed Trump that his job is to give Russia what it wants. That’s what Trump means by "respect" I guess.

[Prophet Margin @David_F_Snyder]

@AnnaBower And they’ll gladly pay Judge Boas next Tuesday for a hamberder today.