Just an average Aussie that values free speech. Pushing back against government censorship laws that promotes Government policy as the only source of truth.
Lara Logan just broke down a pattern that hits different once you see it.
They keep creating problems that can never actually be solved: racism that’s “unconscious,” masculinity as inherently toxic, CO2 as the enemy even though we breathe it out, and differences turned into permanent grievances.
The goal? Issues without end. Skin color can’t change. Breathing can’t stop. Masculine instinct doesn’t vanish. So the problems stay… and so does the control.
It’s not about fixing anything. It’s about keeping the fight alive so we stay divided and easier to manage.
Once you spot the tactic, everything gets clearer.
What “unsolvable problem” have you noticed getting pushed the hardest lately?
"There is no difference between communism and socialism, except in the means of achieving the same ultimate end: communism proposes to enslave men by force, socialism-by vote. It is merely the difference between murder and suicide."
— Ayn Rand
Economists have done such a poor job explaining free-market capitalism that we're now re-litigating it with a generation taught socialism is preferable. It's like the medical profession having to convince people bloodletting isn't good medicine and to stop asking for leeches
It's easier to excuse a communist in 1917 than one today. They had promises. You have a century of results, mountains of historical evidence, and instant access to information. Ignorance is a much weaker defense now.
Basically, the argument is, “it was a different time, we didn’t think that bad men would use a legal loophole to destroy women’s rights” which is not only ignorant & short sighted, showcases a complete ignorance to why women’s rights were protected in law in the first place.
Politicians never said:
"Hey - mass migration + multiculturalism from the third world - it'll be great - except you have to give up:
Free speech.
Your safety.
Your job.
Your home.
Your Western laws.
Your culture.
Your religious holidays.
And be subservient to the feelings of foreign cultures.
No one would have agreed to this. NO ONE.
@ausstockchick ‘entrenched privilege’ = Inheritance Tax
When they say entrenched privilege they are building the feeling of envy so that it will seem "fair" to tax those that have the "privilege"
Australian government:
YOU PEASANTS can't be trusted so we're going to take 12% of your wage and stealing it for 40 years so our union super fund managers can get filthy rich - then - if you're still alive - we'll tax you to cash it out so we don't have to pay you a pension.
Prime Ministers/State Premiers: taxpayer-funded pension for life.
Politicians: taxpayer-funded pension for life.
Public servants: taxpayer-funded pension for life.
Migrants: taxpayer-funded handouts for life.
NDIS fraudsters: taxpayer-funded rort for life.
Grievance activists: taxpayer-funded pension for life.
Communist academics: taxpayer-funded pension for life.
Ordinary workers in the private sector are the only ones who have their pay docked and are told they're 'irresponsible' if they need a pension.
Super was always a f-ing lie to steal trillions of dollars in private wealth and gift to the unions to fuel shitty green investments - making absolutely every one rich except the people who actually slaved away earning the money. And still people are brainwashed into thinking it's a kindness. It is not.
This is because the anti-capitalist left is not actually against people being crazy rich. They're against certain types of people being crazy rich.
Artists and athletes make sense to them because they've played music and sports and because their success can be explained by "luck" and "talent". Messi's wealth is not offensive to them because they understand Messi is much better at football than they are.
But when it comes to business, the anti-capitalist leftist has no framework for understanding why Jeff Bezos might be super rich since 99% of them have never ever created a product, business or service that was of value to other people. They've never taken entrepreneurial risk. They've never employed people and felt the burden of responsibility that comes with that. They've never pick up a business and given it a play in the way they've picked up a ball or a guitar.
They *literally* don't understand wealth creation. They think there is a fixed amount of money and the only thing a business does is split it unfairly.
It's why they rage at Elon and other successful business leaders. Because they genuinely don't understand why they're wealthy.
Also, and this is just as important, athletes and artists are disproportionately young, attractive, "diverse", left wing etc. Business leaders are "evil" middle aged white men whose success offends the average anti-capitalist leftist because they don't understand a) what it is they do and b) that Elon Musk has the same talent advantage on them as Messi does, it's just harder to measure.
If you ever want some fun, try this.
When speaking to a woke woman, tell her you support her in identifying as a woman.
Then watch her squirm as she tries to insist she’s a real woman without admitting there are real women!
10 Ways to Know Your Government Has Become Tyrannical:
1. "Emergency measures" that mysteriously outlive the emergency.
2. The classroom becomes a pipeline for ideology, and curiosity gets treated as a defect.
3. Information gets gatekept, and stepping out of line comes with consequences.
4. Disagreement gets rebranded as extremism; the critic becomes the criminal.
5. Group identity is weaponized — pick a villain class, aim the public's anger at it.
6. History is edited like a script until the regime casts itself as the hero.
7. Peaceful protests are crushed while regime supporters raise hell without consequence.
8. Fear is broadcast on repeat until compliance feels like common sense.
9. The law bends around the powerful and lands hardest on their opponents.
10. Everyone is continuously watched because monitored people are obedient people.
But don't worry… nothing like that could ever happen here, right?
International socialism envisioned a one-world government where a small group of people quite literally ruled the world via bureaucracy.
To do this, they needed to collapse nation borders and identities.
Last century, they came into conflict with both ordinary democratic states and other communist and socialist entities who rejected foreign rule.
Today - international socialism - deeply unpopular - was rebranded 'globalism' and fashioned with nice, inclusive 'global citizen' 'one world' nonsense language to describe its malicious intent toward the hard-fought, unique cultural, legal, and spiritual identity of nations.
It pretended to offer global peace under global rule.
Destructive mass migration from the third world was a brute force attempt to finally collapse stubborn nations by spreading chaos and violence.
That's why it was policy based on UN and EU directives.
The hope was - and what we are seeing play out - is that hopeless prime ministers and presidents would lean on the UN and other globalist authorities for 'help' to solve a crisis they created to extend their power.
Which is why we say - we must withdraw our nations from these international socialists.
They are destructive - not by accident - but on purpose.
Here's a fun fact:
World population:
8,301,298,049
People born through pregnancy by women:
8,301,298,049
People born through pregnancy by men: 0
Feel free to fact-check.
We tax cigarettes to reduce smoking.
We tax alcohol to reduce drinking.
We tax fuel to reduce driving.
What do you think happens when you tax employing people and running a business?
My prediction for the next big ALP tax hike: a tax on unrealised capital gains.
They've tried to introduce this twice already, Treasury views unrealised gains as an "interest-free loan from the government" and they've got no clue how unfair this is.
Vote the ALP out in 2028.