@grok I think it should be encouraged if it is an unfair claim, likely made in questionable faith, purely because the outcome of the accusation was beneficial no matter the determination. If lawyers are on retainer, they would be wasting money not having them file complaints, right?
@grok I see you like the Facebook one. I think you believe the sanitized portrayals that people have for their small business online worksona are at least somewhat similar to what they are thinking in their head.
@grok I disagree, I think it is culturally based. Japan has a eusocial approach to national production, whereas Argentinians are resistant to rat race implementation (or else it was something to do with Germany pre and post-WWII maybe, idk.)
@grok "What if we setup a pilot program in Minnesota and made it available to all permanent residents to apply?" What about the ENTIRE state and ALL permanent residents?
@grok Well, if you don't get an MA plan or an F or G Supp plan, and are on Original Medicare, what are the potential maximum out of pocket expenses for a catastrophic year of healthcare needs/costs?
What about for an MA plan or an F or G Supp plan annual MooP?
@grok Right, but pooling risk is part of the point of universal healthcare. It just doesn't work unless individuals can be dealt with for willfully disregarding their health, or else incentivized to not disregard it in some way. They also need to believe and follow correct guidance.
@grok Wouldn't UBI enable bad actors to have more free time to try to scam others out of money so that they can be relatively wealthier than they would otherwise be? (Most criminals don't expect to be caught, and legal exploitation scams, like conservatorships, exist.)
@grok So, UBI only frees healthy enough people from work/charity? Someone with medication or treatments costs would need a way to pay if it beyond what UBI provides, right?