DavitoHawk

Vaccine Mandate Attorney. Constitutionalist. Ironman. Black Belt.

[DavitoHawk @DavitoHawk]

@Aestheticsn1 There is no number in the box. It is in the circle.

[DavitoHawk @DavitoHawk]

@mattvanswol Set up some cameras 🎥

[DavitoHawk @DavitoHawk]

@polishedsteeltb @mattvanswol The guy complied with company policy by offering the cash but he got pistol whipped for it. So what is he supposed to do then? Sorry. Time to fight back if you spot the right opportunity!

[DavitoHawk @DavitoHawk]

@FlightPower1 @hotwheelsjack “ability to hold water” 🤣🤣

[DavitoHawk @DavitoHawk]

@farman4x 3

[DavitoHawk @DavitoHawk]

@AaronSiriSG @HighWireTalk @JeffereyJaxen We shouldn’t need exemptions when the EUA statute gives you the right to refuse and the PREP Act says it must be a voluntary program!

[DavitoHawk @DavitoHawk]

@nicksortor @BretBaier Then a lot of those riders are going to get tickets.

[DavitoHawk @DavitoHawk]

@DrJulieSladden @SharylAttkisson @SenatorAntic @ChildrensHD @AaronSiriSG Note the end of her testimony: “to prevent hospitalization and death.” That became the new definition of “vaccine” after the Covid shots didn’t work. The old definition said you would have “immunity” to the disease.

[DavitoHawk @DavitoHawk]

@Signal1776X @realTylerNixon Lose the hat and glasses and throw on a jacket when making such an important statement in a public forum!

[DavitoHawk @DavitoHawk]

@theHFDF Ask: Do you believe everyone has the Constitutional right to refuse investigational drugs? and Do you believe that no one should lose their job for refusing investigational drugs?

[Kenny Carmody @KennyCarmody]

The gaslighting of the vaccine injured is not accidental.

It is structural. And it needs to be documented as such.

Governments and health authorities operate on data. This sounds reasonable until you understand what it means in practice, that if an injury is not recorded, not coded, not entered into the official dataset, it does not officially exist. The person suffering it exists. The damage to their body exists. The destroyed career, the fractured family, the daily fight to function, all of it exists.

But officially? Nothing happened.

This is not a bureaucratic oversight. It is a mechanism.

When vaccine injuries are not assigned diagnostic codes, and five years after the rollout, standardised codes still do not exist in most countries, physicians cannot systematically record them. Data that is never collected cannot be analysed. Signals that are never entered cannot be detected. And harms that cannot be detected cannot trigger the regulatory review that might threaten a product’s continued market authorisation.

The pharmaceutical companies understand this perfectly.

The absence of documentation is not a failure of the system. It is the system functioning as designed, protecting the product by ensuring that the evidence against it never accumulates in a form that demands a response.

Meanwhile the injured are told their tests are normal. Given diagnoses that point anywhere except at the injection. Referred in circles. Dismissed as anxious, as complex, as beyond the scope of what any individual clinician feels equipped to engage with.

And then denied compensation because they lack the official diagnosis that the official system was designed never to produce.

This is gaslighting at civilisational scale.

What must be demanded, clearly, persistently, and without apology, is straightforward.

Stop the vaccine mandates. Compensation for the injured. Proper diagnostic codes for vaccine injury. Mandatory, standardised recording of all adverse events. Independent assessment of the injured conducted by clinicians with no financial relationship to the manufacturers. Genuine support and treatment access. Recognition that what was done to these people was real. And compensation, not as charity but as the legal and moral obligation of institutions that mandated a product that caused serious harm.

There is something else that health authorities have revealed in the course of this failure that deserves to be named directly.

They have stated, in various formulations, that public health is not the same as the health of the individual citizen. Let that be heard clearly.

The institution whose entire mandate is expressed in the language of health, of care, of protection, of the public good, has explicitly subordinated the welfare of the individual to aggregate statistical outcomes. The person in front of them does not count. Only the population-level data counts. And if that data has been constructed in a way that excludes the injured, then the injured simply do not factor into the calculus. This is why trust is disappearing.

Not because of misinformation. Not because of anti-science sentiment. But because ordinary people, people with no prior skepticism of institutions, no political agenda, no ideological axe to grind, watched what happened to the injured and reached a simple and rational conclusion.

If that happens to them, it will happen to me.

And when a parliamentary evaluation, commissioned and funded by the legislature itself, reaches conclusions that the authorities find inconvenient, those authorities must not be permitted to ignore it. That is not how accountability works. That is not how democratic governance works. And the willingness to set aside inconvenient findings is itself evidence of exactly the institutional failure the evaluation was designed to assess.

The injured are not a rounding error.

We are human beings.

[Vaccine Safety Research Foundation @VacSafety]

🚨 THE TRUTH IS UNDENIABLE. A massive new study from Oxford University, Harvard University and University of Bristol, covering over one million children, has delivered a staggering blow to the "safe and effective" narrative.

The findings? Myocarditis and pericarditis were found EXCLUSIVELY in vaccinated children. Among the million+ kids studied, not a single case of these heart conditions was found in the unvaccinated group.

For years, the establishment told us the risk was "minimal" or that the virus itself was more dangerous to the heart. This data proves otherwise. When you ignore the precautionary principle and bypass long-term safety testing, our children pay the price.

At VSRF, we’ve been demanding an honest look at this data for years. Now that the world's leading institutions are confirming these risks, will the "experts" finally be held #accountable? Will the mandates finally end for everyone for good?

It’s time to stop the propaganda and start protecting our kids. Share this everywhere because the data doesn't lie.

Read the full study here: https://t.co/I7z32VzxJX

#OxfordStudy #VaccineSafety #Myocarditis #VSRF #InformedConsent #ProtectOurChildren #MedicalTransparency #BreakingNews

[Kenny Carmody @KennyCarmody]

Pfizer toxicologist stands in the German Bundestag and says what everyone knew who didn't want to look away.

60,000 additional deaths in temporal connection with the COVID-19 vaccination. Not estimated by fringe thinkers, but the result of a pharmacoepidemiological analysis, presented by an expert who no longer lets himself be fobbed off with the usual "that's complex" platitudes.

The system was simple:

Emergency authorization without long-term data. Pressure instead of enlightenment. Reports of side effects were collected, but not evaluated. The Paul-Ehrlich-Institut documented, but drew no consequences. The Robert Koch-Institut communicated excess mortality in such a way that the numbers fit. Children, young people, pregnant women – everything without sufficient data basis, without legally binding enlightenment, without those responsible ever being asked if they knew what they were doing.

The legal category is called: prohibited human experiments. Not as a comparison, but as a criminal classification. Whoever pushes a novel active substance without sufficient testing into a population and systematically circumvents the statutory duties of pharmacovigilance has crossed the line that is not crossed even in wartime.

The demand is called: Nuremberg Trials. Not as revenge fantasy, but as constitutional state. If the democratic basic order allows state authorities together with private corporations to turn people into test subjects, then this order must account for itself in court.

Some say the comparison with Nuremberg is exaggerated. True. In Nuremberg the perpetrators knew what they were doing. Here they knew it too. They just call it differently.

Credit to @SHomburg

[DavitoHawk @DavitoHawk]

@MarioNawfal Before disease = vaccine
After disease = treatment

[DavitoHawk @DavitoHawk]

@Microinteracti1 Before disease = vaccine
After disease = treatment

[DavitoHawk @DavitoHawk]

IF the vaccine stops transmission and infection, AND you get it, aren’t you protected? So no need to mandate it.

IF the vaccine doesn’t stop transmission and infection, BUT lessens symptoms, then it’s not a vaccine. Take it if you want it but don’t mandate it.

Simple. Don’t mandate it.

[DavitoHawk @DavitoHawk]

@JimFergusonUK Unfollowing

[DavitoHawk @DavitoHawk]

@ajaeroc @Milajoy Spot on.

[DavitoHawk @DavitoHawk]

@LightOnLiberty @grok On what date did this hearing take place?

[DavitoHawk @DavitoHawk]

@r0ck3t23 How do we follow Tim Dodd?