Dawn Martello

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Looking forward to taking our exciting partnership with Nvidia to the next-level

[Dawn Martello @DawnMartel5224]

Fox News just gave a breaking news “update” saying that a Federal Judge “decided” that Trump’s name, cannot be part of the Kennedy Center. Let me be crystal clear: Nomenclature, of a building, has NOTHING to do with ANY law, much less any judicial jurisdiction. This HAS TO BE fake news. Not even the BRAIN-DEAD Federal District Judiciary is this f***ing brain-dead. And they are pretty damn brain-dead. This “breaking news’” is utter nonsense, and fake, and AKA, fraudulent news.

[Dawn Martello @DawnMartel5224]

The lawyers representing the Defendant, in the Charlie Kirk murder trial, have made PERFECTLY legal motions during pre-trial proceedings concerning the absolute OBLIGATIONS of this court. We are told, by the great state of Utah, that in Utah state courts, Hearsay, is considered “evidence” for purposes of pre-trial motion practice. So, Utah state courts allow INADMISSABLE, LAWLESS NONSENSE, AKA Hearsay, to be submitted as “evidence” in pre-trial proceedings. This is the SAME exact “evidence” that is INADMISSABLE, AT TRIAL.

Hearsay is an out-of-court statement proffered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. Hearsay IS, NOT EVIDENCE. So, for example, a newspaper article, offered to prove the truth of a particular matter being asserted, would be inadmissible, as Hearsay. Because, a newspaper article, is an out-of-court statement. This is true during pre-trial proceedings AND during trial proceedings. DUH. The definition of Evidence, DOES NOT change, between pre-trial and trial. Double-DUH.

It is unconstitutional AND a fraud upon the court, BY the Utah state court itself, to allow Hearsay to be entered into any record much less be litigated at ANY POINT in a legal action. Hearsay is inadmissible IN COURT. Period.

Here’s the deal: You have to bring witnesses, INTO court, and subject to cross-examination, inter-alia, in order to “hear” them say, whatever their testimony may be, in proving (or not) the truth of the matter being asserted.

[Dawn Martello @DawnMartel5224]

It's already AGAINST our law. Sharia Law is OUTLAWED, in this country. A "ban" is superfluous. It's already banned. Trump can enforce provisions of existing LAW, to stop those who are violating our laws, through the imposition of Sharia precepts.
One small example: The SEC can suspend trading, on ANY securities, where interest-free Sharia loan precepts, are in play. Legal predicate: Either a loan is interest-free, for EVERYONE, or it is not. It is against U.S. law, to give interest-free loans to Muslims, while requiring interest-bearing loans, for non-Muslims.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Thank you! 🚀🚀🚀

[Dawn Martello @DawnMartel5224]

@NovajohnsX07 WOVE WOU 😽🩷🫡

[Dawn Martello @DawnMartel5224]

@indyfor45th47th YES. Trump is WHY, we ARE, the strongest and most feared country in the world.

[Dawn Martello @DawnMartel5224]

@future_vision_x YES. What kind of stupid question, is this?? Posing the question itself, is dumb.

[Dawn Martello @DawnMartel5224]

The impeachments of President Trump and of President Clinton, must be voided. Not expunged. VOIDED.

An impeachment, is a legal allegation, of a crime. Once the allegation is voted on, by the House of Representatives, it becomes a “charge.” AKA, a criminal charge. To make an allegation of a CRIME, you need: 1) a legally cognizable crime and, 2) evidence of, that legally cognizable crime. In our justice system, the parallel process is the process of convening a grand jury, in a judicial proceeding. The output of the process is either an indictment -- a criminal charge -- or no indictment. If there is no indictment, then the Defendant cannot be prosecuted further. There is no trial.

The process of indictment, is before a judge. The process of a House impeachment is NOT before a judge. There is NO judge, when the House circulates allegations, to vote on. You don’t have to be a lawyer to be a member of Congress. (They get to write the law, but they don’t have to know, the law. That’s the grift.) So, a bunch of House members, write-up a bunch of bullshit, bearing NO relation WHATSOEVER to ANY LEGAL offense, and vote on it. That’s what happened with Trump. And with Clinton.

The articles of impeachment for Trump were: 1) Abuse of Power and 2) Obstruction of Congress. These are NOT: “Treason, Bribery or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” as required under Article II, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution. There is NO crime called “Abuse of Power.” There is NO crime called “Obstruction of Congress.” Once Trump was a civilian, after the Senate acquitted, if in fact, these were crimes, Nancy Pelosi’s daughter (or anybody) could have pressed criminal charges to be brought, in Federal Court, for these putative “crimes.” That never happened, of course, because they are NOT crimes. And even if they were crimes, they never happened. A Federal District Court judge would tell the prosecutor that they have NOT ARTICULATED a legally cognizable offense, criminal or otherwise. The judge would ALSO tell the prosecutor that they have NOT PROFFERED a single shred of evidence that attaches to ANY criminal act, that might be patched together from the record brought forward. Because there is NO evidence, of ANYTHING. Again, if ANY OF THIS, were criminal, they would have brought these same charges against Trump, the instant he became a civilian. But they didn't. Because they couldn't. Because they are not crimes. Period. They are not even civil offenses. Period.

The articles of impeachment for Clinton were: 1) Perjury before a Grand Jury and, 2) Obstruction of Justice. First of all, Ken Starr and Janet Reno, were crazy people. Straight-up. They together manufactured a Kangaroo “grand jury” process, to “investigate” if Clinton perjured himself during his testimony, in a civil suit brought by the first “me-too-er” Paula Jones. They found NO PERJURY occurred, in that civil case. So, they simply INVENTED, out of whole cloth, the allegation that he must have perjured himself before their Kangaroo grand jury. And they simply manufactured a perjury before-a-grand jury charge. In a legal, grand jury proceeding, the Defendant is NOT even present, nor permitted to testify, nor is even aware that a grand proceeding is taking place. That’s how it works. To be clear, Bill Clinton did NOT have to testify in the Kangaroo grand jury proceeding. But he did. Because he had NOTHING to hide and was completely innocent. Bill also provided a blood test, after Lewinsky claimed his semen was on her blue dress. He did NOT have to give blood. You CAN refuse to do that. There is NO legal requirement to give “blood evidence,” which is bullshit anyway. But he didn’t refuse. He submitted to a blood test. Because he KNEW that it was NOT his semen, on her blue dress. But OF COURSE, the lab report, came up “positive” for Bill Clinton’s DNA match, to the semen on the dress. A horse could have ejaculated onto that blue dress, and they would have announced a DNA match to Bill Clinton. Do you understand? This is JUST like ANY pathology report. It will say, WHATEVER you want it to say. WAKE UP, PEOPLE!!!

On the second article of impeachment, for Clinton, of “Obstruction of Justice” – Bill Clinton NEVER obstructed justice. Just the opposite. He submitted himself willfully and voluntarily to this entire, outrageously lawless process -- a public crucifixion -- concocted by Ken Starr and Janet Reno.

BY THE WAY -- Monica Lewinsky, was GRANTED by Starr, COMPLETE IMMUNITY FOREVER from ANY prosecution for ANY CRIMES she committed, or may have committed, related to this matter. Her mother, got the SAME deal. This was in return for Lewinsky to provide, to Ken Starr, “full and truthful testimony.” Monica did NOT testify, UNTIL she got this deal. Why would Monica be concerned about getting immunity from CRIMINAL prosecution? Immunity for what? For having sex, with someone? That’s neither a crime, nor a tort. She was given immunity from CRIMINAL prosecution, FOREVER. Because she NEEDED that immunity deal, IN ORDER TO bear false-witness against President Clinton. Which she promptly did.

The impeachments of President Trump and of President Clinton, must be voided.

[Dawn Martello @DawnMartel5224]

It is not a newly-created legal category. It is a "consideration" in the penalty phase of a trial. It's as dumb, as the day is long. And it will go away. Because NO ONE, and certainly NO jury, can peer into the mind of another person, and "see" who he/she likes, or hates. It's complete nonsense.

[Dawn Martello @DawnMartel5224]

That is a legal fiction. A term of art. There is only one type of "murder," that has a legal DEFENSE, of "passion." If a married man, comes home and finds his wife in bed with another man, and kills that other man, that is NOT a crime. It is assumed/understood that the other man is an intruder and a rapist and a home invader, and the home is sacrosanct, under the law. And that killing, is entirely justified. This is true, EVEN IF, it is later discovered that his wife was a tramp, sleeping with every guy in town. That DOES NOT matter.

[Dawn Martello @DawnMartel5224]

Straight-up nuts. And, a straight-up, ILLEGAL state law. AKA an unconstitutional state law. AKA ripe for strike-down by SCOTUS. ANY U.S. citizen, domiciled in California, CAN and SHOULD bring this case, into Federal Court. The Federal District Court judge will rule against you. DUH. Expect it. Then, you will appeal to the 9th circuit -- the straight-up insane clown-posse circus-circuit court -- which will also rule against you. Double DUH. Expect it. Then, you will appeal to SCOTUS. When you appeal to SCOTUS, you don't want your appeal to be rejected, at the door. So, get Miranda Devine, of the New York Post, to hold a NATIONALLY TELEVISED presser, with you, on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court. Where you will announce your appeal to SCOTUS, and to the world, at the same time. If you do it this way, SCOTUS will have NO choice, but to take your case, and hear it, and rule on it. And then, SCOTUS will strike-down this monstrous state law.

[Dawn Martello @DawnMartel5224]

FRAUD ALERT: Ticketmaster for U.S. Open event Aug. 25, 2026 w/Federer + McEnroe + Agassi + Roddick, etc. There are about FIVE seats, ONLY, showing as available right now! I am a U.S. Open "Insider" and I got my email for special early access, before the on-sale. 1) There is NO place for me to apply my "Insider" access code; 2) There are MAYBE 5 seats, in the f***ing nosebleed section available, RIGHT NOW; 3) ALL SEATS are showing as "Verified Resale Seats." Here's what: There CAN NOT be any "resale seats" offered BEFORE the on-sale. This is a fraudulent Ticketmaster webpage. It is a dummy site, and a fraud.

[Narendra Modi @narendramodi]

Thank you, President Trump, for your warm wishes.

I look forward to working with you to further advance the India-US Comprehensive Global Strategic Partnership, for the benefit of both our nations and the world.

@POTUS

@realDonaldTrump

[Dawn Martello @DawnMartel5224]

@Brookltnwilliw ARE YOU SERIOUS??? Trump WON in a massive, intergalactic landslide, ALL THREE TIMES. EVERYONE knows this. 🩷🫡🔥⭐

[Dawn Martello @DawnMartel5224]

Here’s just ONE iron-clad thing, that is dispositive proof of election fraud, that has been leveled against Trump. In the 2016 race, between Hillary and Trump, the night of the election returns, I was watching Neil Cavuto, who was the Fox anchor, covering the returns, as they were coming in, live. The chyron read-out, along the bottom of the TV screen, had the two boxes, red and blue, with the numbers changing every second, as they were coming in, from the electronic voting machines, many of which were Dominion (by and large). Don’t quote me on the State, but I believe it was North Carolina. I am giving ROUND numbers: the numbers, that appeared in the red bucket and the blue bucket had come in, at 600,000 for Trump, and 450,000 for Hillary (something like that differential). It was enough of a differential to talk about. And there was also a pause, in the return updates, so it was a good moment for Neil Cavuto to talk about those two numbers, as they appeared on the screen. So, he did. He recounted the fact that Trump was ahead of Hillary “right now” but that returns were yet to come in, the night was still young. Almost as soon as Neil said that, the numbers inside the chyron buckets, literally flipped buckets, in plain view. And now, it was 450,000 for Trump and 600,000 for Hillary. And Neil said so. Neil said something along the lines of: Oh – looks like that just flipped, for Hillary. The two columns just flipped those numbers. So, it is actually reversed, now, and it’s Hillary whose ahead by 600,000 to Trump’s 450,000.

After that, Fox stopped having a single anchor, manning the returns on election day/night, as they came in, in real-time. We NEVER saw that again, on Fox. That vanished entirely. Instead, Fox started creating new formats. Like, they would have Bill Hemmer standing in front of a giant interactive screen, and just enlarging pieces of geography and giving snapshots of where numbers were and where the predictions would likely land, and it was a Show & Tell, and NOT a live report, of the ACTUAL returns, in REAL TIME, as they were coming in.

There are only two places that digital read-outs of election numbers, can be changed.

The first place, is the main place, which would be, for instance, at Dominion (or whichever electronic voting system is being used), where algorithms are being injected into the returns, in real-time, to move numbers from one column (Red), to another column (Blue). It’s not just done with the Presidential columns. It’s also done, down-ticket. But the Presidential ones are key, of course. It is done by computer programmers and mathematical models and they are not doing wholesale flipping of the numbers from Red to Blue, because that would become WAY too conspicuous. Obviously. They instead have algorithms that create marginal differences, small enough to be barely noticed, but large enough to elude a recount. That’s the game plan. This is all done in real-time, as election returns are happening.

The second place that digital read-outs of election numbers, can be changed, is at the network itself, in the Control Room, with the guy manning the Chyron character generator, and the overall generation of digital content, that will appear anywhere on the TV screen. This would be the place where you would be more likely to see a clumsy, wholesale flipping of the numbers, from one bucket into another bucket. Just like we saw it happen. Chyron Operators (AKA Character Generator Operators; AKA CG Operators) are NOT mathematicians, nor statisticians. (They can barely spell, as you will routinely see typos on screen, if you are paying attention.)

Bottom line. Election Fraud is a multi-faceted operation. Election fraud and voter fraud are different. Voter fraud IS election fraud, done by the voter. Election fraud writ large, can be done by anyone, voter or not. Paper ballots, are per se fraud. Paper ballots, which are accepted with a post-mark written-in by the SENDER, and not post-marked by the Post Office, is election fraud AND mail fraud, AND tampering with U.S. Mail, inter-alia. California is currently permitting this to take place, and heaven knows where else it is happening. Postmasters in California, are in GRAVE legal jeopardy, by knowingly processing FRAUDULENT, TAMPERED-WITH, mail. (I don’t care what the state of California has printed in the instructions for voters casting paper ballots in the mail. That is of NO MOMENT. These are all federal felonies no matter what the instructions say.) Electronic ballots are per se fraud, if the voter does not need to show proof of citizenship. DUH. Electronic ballots are per se fraud, where voting systems have computer programmers manipulating the real numbers into the “desired” numbers, in real-time, as the returns are coming in. Moving counts, from one column to another column. Inter-alia.

All of this can be cleaned up. Obviously. Everyone knows where it is happening and how it is happening. This is a no-brainer. Currently, both Democrats and Republicans in Congress have been sitting on bills, and on language of bills, and on versions of language of bills, and on versions of versions of language of bills – just about voter ID, ALONE. It’s the bill called, the SAVE Act. But this deals ONLY with voter ID – and nothing else. And they are STILL languishing, on THIS, alone. And they have not even begun to address all of the other issues.

We need to DE-FRAUD our elections. We certainly DO NOT need to wait for Congress, to write a bill, in order to make this happen. We will be waiting FOREVER, if we do. The Executive Branch can propose that legislation, in a very clean proposed bill. A private citizen can promulgate proposed legislation, and submit it. Barack Obama, himself, can compose it, and submit it. It would be a nice touch, to have an attorney and a Constitutional scholar, drafting such a proposed bill. But you don’t need to be any of these things, to promulgate proposed legislation, for consideration in our Federal legislative process. We-the-People baby! FREEDOM!

[Dawn Martello @DawnMartel5224]

@DanBig9953 YEP

[Dawn Martello @DawnMartel5224]

@hrkbenowen YES

[Dawn Martello @DawnMartel5224]

Here's what's happening: Audiences of the ABC broadcast of the NBA final game right now, Knicks v Spurs, are NOT SEEING THE GAME, THAT IS BEING PLAYED, ON THE COURT. This is a game, that is NOT actually happening, on the court, the way it is being broadcast. Especially the score.