Holy heck @triggersmarthq 😬
no wonder Gary Melton refused to do a recreation.
He's probably done several in private and thought we're not showing this 🤣😂.
I won't comment on your accuracy at 100yards 😉 but this was well worth the effort.
Thankyou for doing this 👍.
https://t.co/2hN97tFP6G
🚨 BAGLEY IS DONE🚨
In cross-examination, a lawyer often asks a series of precise, closed-ended questions to get the witness to commit to a clear version of events under oath. The goal is to “lock in” that version so the witness cannot later soften, qualify, or walk it back without looking evasive. Once the witness has answered “No” multiple times in clear language, that testimony is fixed on the record.
In Officer Chris Bagley’s cross by Kathy Nester (during the July 2026 preliminary hearing in Utah v. Tyler Robinson), this is exactly what happened regarding who was present when he went to the Losee Center roof:
• “When you got up to the roof that afternoon, was anybody around that was law enforcement?” → No.
• “Nobody on the roof?” → No.
• “Nobody on the stairway?” → No.
• “Nobody on the walkway?” → No.
These are not vague answers. They are repeated, specific denials that no one else (especially law enforcement) was with him in the relevant areas during the time he went to the roof and observed the screwdriver and gravel disturbance.
Later in the same cross-examination (after a recess, as shown in the second clip), Nester confronted Bagley with his own body-camera footage. The exchange went roughly as follows:
Nester noted that the bodycam showed another individual in civilian/plain clothes who appeared to have a gun going with him to the Losee building.
Bagley then admitted: he did not know exactly who the person was, but the person had a badge, and Bagley had brought him along “to back me up as I ran up the stairs to make sure I had somebody with me.”
This is the “admission of the companion.” The earlier denials and this later statement are inconsistent on the central point of whether anyone was with him.
Shoutout to @NikkiRosier4 on this!
The skin pattern visible on Charlie Kirk's abdomen image released by @baroncoleman is consistent with what can be seen after a defibrillation shock through adhesive pads
He di3d, so these wounds are exactly what you would expect.
Problem is, Charlie wasn't defibrillated by EMTs
n 1986 a guy got kicked out of every casino in Vegas for counting cards. So he flew to Hong Kong with $180,000 and started betting on horses instead.
He walked away with almost $900 million.
It was Bill Benter.
He realized horse racing was just another counting problem same math, more moving parts.
He and a partner built a computer model that estimated the true odds of each horse. If his numbers showed an edge, he bet. If not, he skipped it.
That’s the whole trick:
Expected value.
EV = p · b − (1 − p)
Only bet when the probability of winning × the potential payout is greater than the chance of losing.
What’s even crazier is that Benter once gave a 45-minute lecture explaining the math behind his system.
That recording was never supposed to become public.
And almost nobody knows it exists.
This is the lecture that professional bettors and hedge fund analysts studied.
The answer is in this video.
Never forget that to this day, over a year later, the only clear picture we have of Tyler Robinson on September 10, 2025 came from @RealCandaceO. Despite the millions of security cameras he supposedly passed that day.
Over the next couple of weeks I'll be opening up parts of my Charlie Kirk investigation to the public
Much of it focuses on the events that led up to Charlie Kirk, & has not been shared publicly anywhere.
We set the stage reviewing the "Turkey Tom Files"
https://t.co/TEfGdaaqXn
WAKE THE FUCK UP RETARDS!
The two party system was created to keep us divided and keep the pedos in charge.
It’s okay, I was once retarded, too.
Wake up.
HOLY SHIT!
that screwdriver, the ONLY thing that connects "Tr" to the rooftop, will be thrown out all because of Bagley. 😂
Kathy Nester set him up PERFECTLY!
She got Bagley to DENY 6 EFFIN TIMES that he saw ANYONE during the time he went to the roof!!!! She covered EVERY BASE, EVERY POSSIBILITY.. not knowing if he'd lie or not....
Less than 2 hours later (including lunch break)
He HAD to admit someone was with him during the DISCOVERY OF THE SCREWDRIVER 😂😂
At minimum, his testimony will be used to impugn his integrity as the dicoverer.
Itll more than likely be used to throw out the discovery altogether.
Bagley purjuring himself like that could lead to a complete dismissal also.
Im saying it "could"
if the claims against Jared Kushner were actually false, he’d be threatening lawsuits.
instead, he’s posting articles from the Jerusalem Post about how the information is “lacking evidence” 😂😂😂😂😂😂
🙌🙌
Also what exactly does Macron’s lawyer mean when he says they would consider “other ways” to hold me personally accountable despite the ruling.
Your client is the sitting President of a foreign country that is currently on fire. He should maybe reflect and consider ways to be personally responsible to his countrymen.
https://t.co/S2JqfK84yB
If Tyler's phone wasn't pinged at the Losee centre during the times they claim he was on the roof they have a big problem trying to convince a Jury. More reasonable doubt 🧐.
Kudos to the person that first picked this up 👍.