Dean Heffta

Helping leaders grow beyond technical competency into leadership mastery.

[Dean Heffta @DeanHeffta]

@brim006 April?

[Dean Heffta @DeanHeffta]

@brim006 Technically it's Hamilton

[Dean Heffta @DeanHeffta]

@brim006 That's Grafton

[Dean Heffta @DeanHeffta]

@midwestern_ope Bengals?

[Dean Heffta @DeanHeffta]

@Cernovich Is he a Habsburg?

[Dean Heffta @DeanHeffta]

@TrungTPhan I had heard it was a cross of Kentucky Bluegrass, Featherbed Bent, and Northern California Sensemilla...

[Dean Heffta @DeanHeffta]

@BrianRoemmele Mr. Anderson...

[Dean Heffta @DeanHeffta]

@brim006 "Debt-Induced Resentment"

[Dean Heffta @DeanHeffta]

@NickHorob I use a solar + cellular Eufy security camera. Sends video and you can check it live. Much better than trail cams.

[Dean Heffta @DeanHeffta]

@brim006 the modern Garrison Diversion

[Dean Heffta @DeanHeffta]

@DaleStarkA10 Looking good Maurice.

[Dean Heffta @DeanHeffta]

@Rainmaker1973 It's what every auto service station in the US had in every restroom until 20 years ago.

[Dean Heffta @DeanHeffta]

@brim006 No mosquito pill?

[Dean Heffta @DeanHeffta]

@brim006 You could throw some Enchanted Highway pics in occasionally too...

[Dean Heffta @DeanHeffta]

@messedupcars Granny

[Dean Heffta @DeanHeffta]

@brim006 Ouch 😂

[Dean Heffta @DeanHeffta]

@brim006 Must be the better weather in GF

[Dean Heffta @DeanHeffta]

@michaeljknowles What are his thoughts on school busses?

[Dean Heffta @DeanHeffta]

@pete_90210 going ice fishing today?

[Simon Maechling @simonmaechling]

Glyphosate isn’t controversial because it’s understudied.

It’s controversial because the evidence is ignored.

Fact 1. This chemical is exhaustively studied:
•40+ years of data.
•Thousands of studies.
•Reviewed repeatedly across continents.

Fact 2. Global regulators agree:
Every major regulatory authority that assesses real-world exposure reaches the same conclusion:
•US EPA
•EFSA
•ECHA
•Health Canada

👉 Not carcinogenic at human exposure levels.
👉 Not genotoxic.
👉 No unacceptable health risk when used as directed.

This is not one agency.
This is not a global conspiracy.

Fact 3: The largest human study says no.
•54,000+ pesticide applicators.
•Followed since 1993.
•No link to overall cancer.
•No consistent link to non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

If glyphosate caused cancer, this study should have found it.

It didn’t.

Fact 4: Food residues are not the issue.
•Residues are far below safety limits.
•Dietary exposure does not pose a cancer risk.
•Drinking water exposure is not a health hazard.

“Toxic” without dose is not toxicology.

Fact 5: Worker exposure is also low.
•Measured exposures are far below NOAELs.
•Regulators repeatedly conclude: not of concern.

So where does the scare come from?

One outlier → IARC

IARC did a hazard classification, not a risk assessment.

They put glyphosate in the same category as:
•Red meat.
•Hot beverages.
•Being a barber.

IARC explicitly ignores exposure.

Regulators do not.

This is the entire conflict:
Hazard-only classification
vs
Risk-based regulation.

Confuse the two - and fear wins.

Bottom line:
No pesticide regulator on Earth currently considers glyphosate a cancer risk at real-world exposure levels.

The science is boring.
It’s to put a stop to the misinformation.