DearICT

Here to be proven wrong

[DearICT @Dear_ICT]

ICT's trading concepts don't work. Open to being proven wrong

[DearICT @Dear_ICT]

@I_Am_The_ICT so like what's up with the orderflow? Is It bullish or bearish? Or maybe your logic is flawed

[DearICT @Dear_ICT]

@Patrickwieland @I_Am_The_ICT Can't wait to see it happen. It's a waste of space watching his little minions try to police people calling him out for flawed logic. When you criticize him, a bunch of unprofitable students of his tell you you're doing it wrong and when you ask how they vanish

[DearICT @Dear_ICT]

@I_Am_The_ICT check out how the bodies respected the level and didn't give a fuck

[DearICT @Dear_ICT]

@I_Am_The_ICT @YouTube you know what's funny about ICT's concepts of grading inefficiencies and using those gradient levels for picking pd arrays? If you draw a random fib and do the same thing, you get the exact same effect. I placed this fib with my eyes closed and look at how the levels react

[DearICT @Dear_ICT]

@Drafttrading @I_Am_The_ICT 100% agree, nothing makes sense. He has 81 PD Arrays and he breaks them all down into 16th across every timeframe. Your chart would look like a fucking laser show

[DearICT @Dear_ICT]

@no_bbod_yy00 @I_Am_The_ICT @Jeremy859153445 be careful asking him questions, he just blocks you and throws you into a group called "Hookers On Parade". If you call him out on something that he can't explain then he DEFINITELY will throw you in here

[DearICT @Dear_ICT]

@I_Am_The_ICT so which one is it since all your concepts can be flipped around for bullishness or bearishness

[DearICT @Dear_ICT]

@FPX500 @ICT_Concepts @Patrickwieland dude just blows whoever's dick he can ride. First it was the mas7erbaiter and now it's ICT's

[DearICT @Dear_ICT]

@vitalkyle757 @I_Am_The_ICT then what's the proper context to apply it?

[DearICT @Dear_ICT]

@I_Am_The_ICT check out the bodies! Really stayed below that wick when the bodies proved themselves didn't they

[DearICT @Dear_ICT]

@vitalkyle757 @I_Am_The_ICT I understand how there's statistical probabilities in this so every instance of it won't work but I don't see how there's this high degree of accuracy in his work when I can just walk backwards from any point in the chart and poke holes in his logic

[DearICT @Dear_ICT]

Notice how @I_Am_The_ICT will NEVER answer questions that involve quantifying the vague parts of his trading theology. he said he's answered the question on bias and just look at how many people still don't know it. The only quantified way is ORG but that's it

[DearICT @Dear_ICT]

@vitalkyle757 @I_Am_The_ICT I've literally shown how it doesn't work all over my feed. Word for Word his exact logic

[DearICT @Dear_ICT]

@vitalkyle757 @I_Am_The_ICT lol then you didn't pay attention to ICT's videos because he says that shit all the time

[DearICT @Dear_ICT]

@vitalkyle757 @I_Am_The_ICT So if one of the 3 averages hit's midpoint, you should expect the other 2 to not hit it?

[DearICT @Dear_ICT]

5 out of the last 15 Opening Range Gaps hit their C.E. by 10AM. Ummmm @I_Am_The_ICT I think your statistic is inversed, it's more like 70% of the time it doesn't hit the midpoint by 10AM

[DearICT @Dear_ICT]

@vitalkyle757 @I_Am_The_ICT lol this is the problem, it's some mystical unquantified thing. ICT will be like just look where it's smooth but I've seen smooth levels not be the draw plenty of times. It's truly 50/50

[DearICT @Dear_ICT]

@vitalkyle757 @I_Am_The_ICT If you were watching that live and you saw the bodies closing below then you'd assume it's going to drop lower based on ICT's teaching. The bodies showing respect to the lower half = bearishness according to him

[DearICT @Dear_ICT]

@vitalkyle757 @I_Am_The_ICT He's taught the opposite as well of if it fails to get to a level, it signifies underlying weakness in a move. What quantifies a failure to reach a level vs it leaving short term liquidity before trading to it?

[DearICT @Dear_ICT]

Dear @I_Am_The_ICT so how come your orderflow concept failed here. It failed to reach NDOG, broke down aggressively, then fizzled out. Praying for everyone that entered short and got their ass handed to them because they listened to ICT

[DearICT @Dear_ICT]

@vitalkyle757 @I_Am_The_ICT I know ORG is on every future, I'm just not following at what you're getting at with I'm only looking at NQ. The odds of something failing. The odds of only the last 5 out of the 15 working if it's truly 70% likely to happen is around 0.3%

[DearICT @Dear_ICT]

@vitalkyle757 @I_Am_The_ICT it's all that back and forth which he has highlighted as a BPR in his teachings. After running out the REH it does drop so I don't see the logic behind how that acts as a "brick wall" in price.

[DearICT @Dear_ICT]

@I_Am_The_ICT check out that BPR acting as a brick wall just like you teach!

[DearICT @Dear_ICT]

@vitalkyle757 @I_Am_The_ICT What do you mean? I've only ever seen him reference Opening Range Gaps on anything but NQ. Has he spoken about operating the operating range of viable ORG on ES and YM?

[DearICT @Dear_ICT]

@vitalkyle757 @I_Am_The_ICT I'm not following. In his video, he is referencing how a SIBI is reused in the event Buy Side Liquidity is taken and then a candle closes below the SIBI and then it'll be "reset". In the 1st half of 10AM that fails but in the 2nd half it works. That's a 50/50 odds event

[DearICT @Dear_ICT]

@I_Am_The_ICT If you go to your 7/16/26 Trade Explanation, you say that the FVG "resets" after buy side is taken and then closes below it but you ignore the time it did that and failed. Why is that? Timestamp is around 22:20 for those wanting to fact check me