Deborah Field

Animal advocate and lawyer; former legal policy maker and academic.

[Jalmivo @Jalmivo]

Shop now: https://t.co/s6EompPRCL
Give your skirt-and-top combo a fresh detail. Round toes and cutouts bring a different look to these platform Mary Janes—make them part of your next outfit.

[Deborah Field @DebFieldACT]

@bresso22 @salltweets Good point.

[Daisy and Dream @daisyanddream]

A denim jacket that isn't borrowed from the men's rail. Shop Now at Daisy & Dream.

[Deborah Field @DebFieldACT]

The Shortest History of Japan – The Interlocutor Podcast – Ep. 31 https://t.co/xPdkW00aff via @LesleyDowner

[Sall Grover @salltweets]

Women’s rights went first because they were the easiest to take. But if the government & the courts can force you to deny that sex is real, binary and material, they can force you to deny anything. What is more terrifying than a country that will not let you acknowledge reality?

[Farm Girl Carrie™️👩‍🌾 @FarmGirlCarrie]

I love these knot ideas.
I’m definitely hanging on to this
and practicing. Pick out a couple
and try them yourself 🪢

[Massimo @Rainmaker1973]

One of the most iconic moments in NBA history

[James Melville 🚜 @JamesMelville]

Call me a Luddite, I couldn’t care less. Technology is eating the world.

[MJ Murphy @hothingsgirlsay]

Cenk Uygur says he would rather see his own daughter finish second, third or EIGHTH than “traumatize” a boy by telling him he cannot compete in the girls’ category.

How generous of him to volunteer his daughter to lose!!

Girls are children too, sir.

Their records matter. Their medals matter. Their scholarships matter. Their opportunities matter—even when they are not choosing between Yale and Dartmouth.

You cannot purchase compassion for one child with another child’s rights.

And no, protecting female sports does not require coaches to “inspect children’s genitalia.” Sex can be privately verified once through simple medical testing, less invasively than a COVID test.

Girls are not therapy equipment.

Female sports are not an affirmation service.

Girls’ rights are not yours to give away.

Do you agree with Cenk? Would you volunteer your daughter to come second, third, or eighth in an unfair competition?

[SolarQuotes @Solar_Quotes]

There are heaps of reputable solar brands in Australia, and a minefield of crap ones.
My rule: if I wouldn't put it on my grandmother's roof, I won't recommend it.
Here are the brands that pass my test.

[Deborah Field @DebFieldACT]

I just joined the waitlist for Nora, an AI language tutor you actually talk to. Early members lock in founders' pricing: https://t.co/2rDuARWAnG

[Prof. Gary Francione @garylfrancione]

Trans ideology represents a profound level of violence: it proposes the outright abolition of women as a sex class and characterizes as bigotry/discrimination any concern about that abolition. The fact that many people don't see this shows the strength of misogyny.

[Sall Grover @salltweets]

“The longer this continues, the clearer the message: in Australia, a man’s claim to womanhood now outweighs a woman’s right to exclude him. That is not progress. It is institutionalised misogyny dressed up as human rights.”

My latest op-ed. Link 👇

[Colin Wright @SwipeWright]

My scholarly article "Why There Are Exactly Two Sexes" has been accessed over 50K times, placing it in the top 8 of all articles in the journal's history.

Activists refuse to cite it or acknowledge it exists.

I'm still waiting for someone to publish a scholarly scientific takedown of it. You'd think this would be a top priority for those asserting "sex is a spectrum" who believe my work is bigoted, pseudoscientific, and actively harming a vulnerable community.

Until then, you can read it and arm yourself with a thorough understanding of the 5 major frameworks that activists and activist scientists use to undermine the binary nature of the sexes and why they all fail.

🔗https://t.co/k6VEmRcgqM

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

I’ve just seen a post from yet another man who thinks my position has shifted since I wrote my 2020 essay about gender identity ideology and the consequent clash of rights https://t.co/pasxBD1Hzl

For the avoidance of doubt, I stand by every word I wrote then. For instance: ‘woman isn’t a costume.’ If it surprises you that I say men don’t become women by wearing make up and dresses, you didn’t understand the essay. I’ve been crystal clear all along that I believe people are free to live and present themselves as the opposite sex if that’s what feels comfortable and authentic TO THEM. This appears to have been interpreted (most often, tellingly, by men) as ‘and it naturally follows that I, as a woman, will validate a man’s belief that he is now, to all intents and purposes, the same sex as me, and I will use only the speech he deems appropriate and will be very careful to protect his sensitive ego, no matter the cost to myself in pretending to believe a falsehood, or the loss of my own rights due to this pretence.’

Dress as you like within normal bounds of situational decency, wear lipstick, sequins and a beard if you want, call yourself whatever you like, have sex with any consenting adult you please: I wish you health, happiness and safety. What you don’t get is the power to compel my speech and belief.

When I call a man a man, I am speaking verifiable truth. It is essential to be able to accurately name sex when discussing fair sport, facilities and services for women and girls and the right of gay people not to be demonised for their same-sex attraction. In years to come, a lot of useful idiots are going to awake to the fact that they’ve been complicit in enormous harm done to women, girls, gay people who stood against the insanity, and some extremely vulnerable young people. I don’t doubt we’ll hear a lot of, ‘I thought I was just being kind.’ Such individuals, especially those in positions of power, should be asked why they never had anything to say about the loud, public, widespread unkindness directed against those who refused to adopt their fashionable, elitist beliefs, eg, the detransitioners being bullied and vilified by former ‘allies’, the whistleblowers who tried to stop an unregulated experiment on troubled children, the women who lost their careers and livelihoods by standing up for all women’s rights.

Some people appear to believe it a worse crime for a woman to call a man a man than for trans activists to call loudly and publicly for the assault and assassination of all women who refuse to bend the knee. I have never wished violence or any other kind of harm on a trans-identified person, but, like many other people who’ve defended women’s and girls’ rights over the past few years, I have received thousands of threats of death, rape and torture. The wilful blindness of those who bleat ‘both sides’ will rightly be judged harshly in times to come.

TL;DR Trans women aren’t women, and if that hurts your feelings, be grateful you live in a society where you are just as free to espouse gender ideology as I am to speak the truth. As Orwell said: ‘Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.’

[MJ Murphy @hothingsgirlsay]

Ive taken plenty of Biology classes. I even took a cadaver class.

[The Heretical Liberal 🇨🇦 @Rob_ThaBuilder]

Its a great question and one with a relatively straightforward answer:

Why IS the large amount of energy spent brute forcing weird language changes entirely directed toward changing the language used to describe women - "pregnant people", "uterus havers", "menstrators", "ppl with vaginas" - but absolutely none designed to change language used for men? Where is the energy devoted to changing "men" into ejaculators, penis people, or testicle havers?

The reason is simple: its a movement entirely devoted to advancing tbe interests of fetishistic men, period. Nobody in this movement - including the trans themselves - gives the slightest shit about the trans identified females. They are the movements Useful Idiots, their existence is entirely devoted to one role: to validate the mens claims that they are "real women" by making it appear to be a universal phenomenon instead of a male-specific fetish.

This is why the women are more or less required to take the testosterone, to gave their breasts removed and (sometimes) to get the fake flesh roll penis in order to be considered a "real man" in the trans community, but a man is not required to take drugs or surgeries to be validated, he is a woman at the very second he declares he is. The women need to pay the cost in blood and flesh in order to be validated, the men simply need to recite the magic words.

In pop culture terms, this is why Ellen Page needed to cut her breasts off and take deformity-inducing levels of tesosterone to "be a man", but Bruce Jenner gets to keep his cock, throw on a dress, and @VanityFair declares him Woman Of The Year.

The hilarious irony of all the libfems supporting this nonsense is how they see "The Patriarchy" is so many situations in life where it doesnt really exist, and yet when the purest, most male-centred version of Patriarchial control appears, they support it with the vigor and intensity that their suffragette foremothers fought for the right to vote

[Ella Frei @EllaFrei17]

They taped maps in our hallways telling girls where else to go. We were expected to perform humiliation rituals so the adults wouldn’t have to make a decision. Then they hired lawyers to make our case disappear.

Yesterday, I decided to once again confront my school board.

[Sall Grover @salltweets]

There are only two sexes, and when anyone tries to deny this they literally only list the two sexes - male & female - never a third or fourth, exactly as you have done. Seyer Syndrome, for example, is not a third sex. It’s a condition within the female sex.

There really is no need to beclown yourself to get men into women’s sport, because even if there was a third sex, it would just create a new sport category, not put men in women’s sport.