DSmit

🇺🇸🇮🇱🎗️🙏

[MJ_TX Patriot🇺🇸 @asteadfastfaith]

Amen! No two snowflakes are alike, no two zebras, giraffes or tigers have the same pattern - a tigers stripes continue on to their skin underneath; our blood vessels, if laid out, would stretch out 60,000 to 100,000 miles - enough to circle the earth two to four times; the pistol shrimp has a special claw that functions like an acoustic cannon it shuts rapidly while hunting creating a 60 mile an hour stream of water; no human finger prints are the same; our stomachs produce strong enough acid to dissolve metal yet doesn’t digest itself because the lining is replaced every 3 to 5 days; our livers can regenerate most of their mass after major damage and our skeletons rebuild themselves every ten years through a continuous bone remodeling process.

[Jelly 果冻糕 @jellyjellycake]

how can you not believe in God when octopuses DREAM and otters have a favorite rock they carry around in a little SKIN POCKET and cows have BEST FRIENDS and bees are out there communicating the coordinates of flowers through INTERPRETIVE DANCE and they have REGIONAL DIALECTS??

cats are PURRING at frequencies associated with bone healing??? forests get absolutely incinerated and respond by growing FLOWERS??? dolphins literally invent NAMES for themselves and yell them across the ocean??? penguins are waddling around Antarctica looking for the PERFECT LITTLE ROCK to give their beloved???

CROWS REMEMBER YOUR FACE. THEY TELL OTHER CROWS ABOUT YOU. THEY TELL THEIR CHILDREN ABOUT YOU. YOU CAN HAVE GENERATIONAL BEEF WITH A BIRD.

goats have ACCENTS. rats GIGGLE when you tickle them. elephants mourn their dead. whales make SONGS and then OTHER WHALES LEARN THE SONG and suddenly everybody across the ocean is singing the new hit single.

monarch butterflies are born knowing how to fly thousands of miles to a place THEY HAVE NEVER BEEN. sea turtles hatch out of an egg, immediately sprint toward an OCEAN they have never seen, disappear into it for like THIRTY YEARS and then somehow come back to THE SAME BEACH???

birds can see COLORS THAT WE CANNOT SEE. there are colors happening RIGHT NOW that we don’t even get to know about.

there are sea slugs that eat algae and STEAL ITS CHLOROPLASTS and then are just like great thanks I’ll be PHOTOSYNTHESIZING NOW. there are mushrooms communicating underground. there are seeds sitting in the dirt for DECADES like no actually I will wait.

squirrels plant MILLIONS OF TREES because they simply cannot remember where they put their snacks.

A CATERPILLAR GOES INTO A LITTLE BAG, DISSOLVES MOST OF ITS BODY INTO ORGANIC SOUP, REARRANGES ITSELF, GROWS WINGS AND LEAVES.

and you’re telling me a tiny acorn knows how to become a 70-foot oak tree??? nobody tells it what to do??? it just has TREE INSTRUCTIONS INSIDE IT???

your body started as ONE CELL. ONE. and that cell divided itself into a brain that can think about its own existence and eyes that can look at stars and hands that can hold somebody else’s hands and a heart that runs on ELECTRICITY without you even asking it to???

the iron in your BLOOD was made inside a STAR.

I’M SORRY?????

we are walking around on a wet rock covered in bioluminescent oceans and singing whales and laughing rats and birds holding lifelong grudges and flowers exploding out of FIRE and somehow we’re supposed to act like this is a normal place to live?????????

[DSmit @DebSmit11235162]

@penny777

[Guardian Eagle @eagle_patriot21]

My friend who works at @Microsoft just told me that INDIAN managers at @Microsoft are allegedly filing green-card applications for their INDIAN H-1B employees under the EB-1 category (which is a first-preference employment-based green card for people who have extraordinary abilities, outstanding academic records, or executive-level corporate experience) by exaggerating their profiles and qualifications.

That is immigration fraud, and @USCIS should disapprove and deny these applications and investigate this fraud immediately.

I wouldn’t be surprised if similar practices are happening at other major tech companies, including @amazon , @Google , @Meta , @Apple and other big tech!

@USLaborIG @AAGDhillon

[Wesley Yang @wesyang]

It's OK to keep men out of women's changing rooms. Indeed, it is reasonable and correct to do so and wrong to do otherwise.

Zooey Zephyr is a man who has cut off his genitals. Cutting off his genitals did not make him a woman. He remains the man he was when he still had male genitals.

He has a right to persist in the private belief that he is a woman but no right to violate sex-based boundaries on the basis of that private belief.

This private belief must have no standing before the law. It confers no rights on anyone who believes it and no duties on any other person or institution who interacts with anyone who believes it. Sincerely believing yourself to be something you are not does make you into the thing you are not and does not oblige anyone else to pretend that you are that thing. The attempt to impose duties onto people to pretend that other people are something they are not is an assault on a fundamental right that everyone holds and that no one can infringe. It must be refused in its totality.

This is the only possible stable settlement of this question.

[Yossi BenYakar @YossiBenYakar]

“The Jews conquered Palestine.”

That line is repeated every day. It is also false.

Jews have lived in the Land of Israel for more than 3,500 years. Archaeology and history confirm it. “Palestine” was a Roman name for a region, not a country.

There has never been a sovereign state called Palestine. Not under the Ottomans. Not under the British. It was a territory, not a nation.

Jews were never absent from this land. Even in exile, communities remained. Ancient coins and records show a continuous Jewish presence.

The irony is brutal.
In the 1930s, Nazi Germany told Jews to “return to Palestine.”
In 1940, Norway ran the line: “Palestine is calling all Jews.”

Then came 1947.
The UN offered two states: one Jewish, one Arab.
The Jews said yes.
The Arabs said no, launched a war, and five Arab armies joined them.

Until 1967, Palestinian Arabs were citizens of Jordan and Egypt. The story of a “State of Palestine” that Jews “conquered” is a political invention.

The truth still matters.
Share this before the lie becomes the only version people hear.

[Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 @TRobinsonNewEra]

Islamic "scholar" Dr. Shabir Ally says: “A Muslim man can have 4 wives and an unlimited number of female sex slaves...The four wives are also slaves, but with higher status.”

Saying these things in Canada BTW.

Deport.

[BRITAIN IS BROKEN 🇬🇧 @BROKENBRITAIN0]

Meanwhile in Piddington 🇬🇧

Locals in the tiny town have noticed signs on their lampposts informing them that the lights will be SWITCHED OFF between 12:30am and 5:30am.

Piddington has a population of 350 people and the government has announced plans to house 1,250 unknown, fighting aged foreign males in the community, this is nearly 4x the amount of residents that already live there….

They’ve imported a hostile foreign army and then turned the lights off….

Credit: @PiddingtonNews

[Andrew Kolvet @AndrewKolvet]

IMPORTANT: Jesse Watters just pressed Abdul El-Sayed on a 2022 clip where he says efforts to ban Sharia law are driven by white supremacy.

He lies and says no one is trying to push Sharia (they are), and draws a false equivalency to Christian Canon law.

Canon law determines how Christian leaders, churches, and Christians should live, but Canon law is limited to affairs of the Church (spiritual penalties). Canon law grants great autonomy to the state.

Sharia law is MUCH more comprehensive, governing all aspects of life, and historically, and according to many contemporary Islamic clerics, dictates the affairs of the state.

When in the minority in the West, Muslims will play by the rules, moderate their stances (lie), and they will use intersectional alliances to take advantage of their miniority status. Once they reach a population tipping point they will exert massive power, institute Sharia, and use our own secular government to do so.

[Diana Alastair💚🤍💜 ⚢ ❌❌ @sappholives83]

“The brain of a woman.”

And how do we tell that it’s a woman’s brain, Helen? Is it pink? Does it have little bows on it? Or do you mean a brain that is mostly focused on babies and cleaning and being submissive to men? Is that what you mean, Helen?

[Kosher @koshercockney]

The difference between Zionism and Islamism.

Zionism: One tiny piece of land should belong to the Jews and anyone else that’s okay with that is welcome

Islamism: EVERY land should belong to Muslims and if you’re not okay with that, you either convert or die

[DFF @DFF6769]

Enes Kanter and Royce White star in newest woke WNBA ad 🔥

[Orla Minihane @orlaminihane]

Condoms and Lubricants for what ? To RAPE BRITISH WOMEN???? @UKLabour you absolute bastards!! 😡💔

[Basil the Great @BasilTheGreat]

🚨NEWS: The release of the transcripts around Henry Nowak's murder have revealed that Police Officers went back 6 years in his phone messages to when he was just 12 years old in an attempt to find anything they could use to describe him as a racist

Sickening

[Wesley Yang @wesyang]

“Her penis” was the punchline to a Ricky Gervais joke — until it became guidance for how New Zealand rape victims must describe the appendage that penetrated them against their will if their rapist claims to be a woman.

You see, it is vitally important that male rapists who used their penises to rape women have their feelings protected by courts against the harm of being referred to as their sex.

[Rabbi Poupko @RabbiPoupko]

PLEASE HELP MAKE THIS YOUNG MAN FAMOUS

Yotam Budnik is a 12th-grade student from Rehovot 🇮🇱 just won a gold medal at the International Olympiad in Informatics in Uzbekistan but was not allowed to compete under the Israeli flag.

When Yotam was awarded his medal 🏅 stepped onto the podium, pulled an Israeli flag out of his pocket and wore it in defiance of the Anti-Semitic discrimination.

While the medal 🏅 was revoked from him for his courage, he has no regrets

"The law that prevents me from waving the flag is based only on politics, and I thought there was no place for that in a scientific competition", he said.

The organizers demanded that he return his medal.

Yotam said no.

Organizers took away his certificate and removed his ranking from the website.

Please help make sure the world knows the name Yotam Budnik and that he is not only a world class computer science genius, but also a man of courage and pride of the Jewish people 💙

[Cam Higby 🇺🇸 @camhigby]

TikTok has now unbanned me and restored the videos from Minnesota poll sites.

Thank you to all who assisted. Total victory.

[Cam Higby 🇺🇸 @camhigby]

🚨🚨 My TikTok account was just PERMA BANNED me after I posted 2 clips from my burqa report in Minneapolis.

TikTok says the videos were ELECTION MISINFORMATION. Yesterday I received a warning saying my account was at risk, I never posted again and today it was banned at 780k.

This is very saddening as my account was verified and I have worked with TikTok corporate and politicians to prevent the app from being banned in the name of free speech. I built a strong relationship with the company, today that company chose to ban ME.

I was also banned from the platform in 2021 on Biden’s Inauguration Day when the app was my primary income. TikTok repeatedly told me that I didn’t violate their guidelines. My account would be unbanned, and then banned again a week later repeatedly until it was wiped from the system.

[Simon Elmer @SimonElmer2022]

Jason Arday wasn’t a fantasist or serial liar. He wasn’t a poster boy for the woke-Left or an unfairly hounded victim of the far-Right. Jason Arday was a criminal, and he chose suicide rather than face the consequences of his crimes.

In the UK, fraud is formally prosecuted under the Fraud Act 2006. This defines fraud as false representation, which means lying or misleading someone intentionally; as failure to disclose information you have a legal duty to share; or as abuse of a position of trust. A person is guilty of fraud if he knowingly commits the above offences in order to make a gain for himself or another, or to cause loss to another or expose them to the risk of loss. The gain or loss may be money or other property, including intellectual. A person guilty of fraud is liable, on conviction, to imprisonment for up to 10 years, or to a fine, or to both. Criminal prosecutions for fraud are handled by the Crown Prosecution Service. Civil actions are pursued by victims to recover lost money.

Jason Arday was guilty of committing all three categories of fraud; but whom did he defraud, and of what?

The first group of people defrauded by Jason Arday is the British taxpayer who funded the various grants he was awarded to gain his degrees at Bachelors, Masters and Doctoral level. None of his degrees should have been awarded, and he never should have received the funding to undertake them. So the British taxpayer has been defrauded of money that should have gone to a genuine student or students producing work of benefit to our society, not DEI rubbish about decolonising the very academic institutions he was defrauding.

To be sure, Arday himself wasn’t responsible alone for this fraud, and the various academics who oversaw his theses and the boards that awarded him the degrees are also guilty of fraud, and should be investigated and, if found guilty of complicity to defraud the British taxpayer, compelled to refund the cost of the funding.

The second group of people defrauded by Jason Arday are the academics who were not awarded the positions in academia he was granted. Following the awarding of his fraudulent academic credentials, Arday was appointed to a bewildering succession of positions, including, in 2018, a senior lectureship at the University of Roehampton before he had published a single academic paper; an associate professorship, two years later, at the University of Durham; a professorship, two years after that, at the University of Glasgow; and, finally, a year later, in 2023, a professorship at the University of Cambridge.

In a mere five years, therefore, Arday went from an unpublished student to a Professor earning in excess of £100,000/per year at one of the highest ranked universities in the world. These positions, and the financial rewards and career benefits they brought Arday, should all have gone to academics with real degrees, who had conducted real research and written real books that made significant and, given the seniority and prestige of these posts, contributions to the field of sociology ranking with the best sociologists in the world.

The third group of people defrauded by Jason Arday were the scholars whose dissertations, articles and books he plagiarised in his own, fraudulent academic work. It is sometimes hard for non-academic to understand the seriousness of plagiarism, particularly in an academic context. It means, first of all, that the plagiarist is unworthy of trust, and should never be allowed anywhere near an educational or pedagogical context in which they have authority over children, as Jason Arday was. But in more legal terms, plagiarism is theft.

Academics have one form of capital, and it isn’t money. It is their intellectual property. Research, for an academic, is grabbed in the evenings they don’t spend with their wives or friends and the weekends of a professional life otherwise taken up by teaching, marking, and the growing administrative burden of the modern academic. Actually publishing an article or book typically requires the awarding of a grant sufficient to absent them from such work. When Jason Arday stole their work, he stole that grant, he stole those weekends, he stole those evenings, he stole their ideas. And by publishing their work as his own, he also stole the publishing opportunities and consequent career advancements denied to the plagiarised academics in favour of his fraudulent research.

Again, Arday himself wasn’t only responsible for this fraud, and the editors and other people responsible for overseeing the integrity of academic and other scholarship are complicit in his defrauding of these plagiarised scholars.

The fourth group of people defrauded by Jason Arday were the scholars who were not awarded the publishing contracts for books that were passed over for the garbage that Arday published. These included such titles as Dismantling Race in Higher Education: Racism, Whiteness and Decolonising the Academy, which was published by Palgrave Macmillan in 2018; Cool Britannia and Multi-Ethnic Britain: Uncorking the Champagne Supernova, which was published by Routledge in 2020, which is the sort of thing a hack like Owen Jones might write but is not consistent with a Professor of Sociology at Cambridge University; We See Things They'll Never See: Love, Hope and Neurodiversity, a sort of self-help book through pop songs published by Princeton University Press in 2025; and his memoir, Great and Unfortunate Things, which was published this year by Simon & Schuster, and which, again, is not the academic work expected and required of such a senior academic in such a prestigious institution.

Again, Arday was not alone in defrauding genuine academics out of the book deals they were passed over for this tripe, and it’s indicative of the commercialisation of academia in the UK that academic positions are now awarded not on the academic worth of the candidate’s research but on the book sales of fluff like this that is paid for and promoted by publishers more interested in a DEI readership than in academic rigour.

The fifth group of people defrauded by Jason Arday, and by far the most with a grievance against him, are his students. In the time he occupied these elevated academic positions, Arday would have taught, or occupied the position of teaching, thousands of students. They or their parents will have paid thousands of pounds each, up front or in the student debts they have accumulated, to be taught by someone unqualified to do so. Not only have they been defrauded out of their money, they have also been defrauded out of the education they paid for. For the rest of their lives, there will be a question, not least in their own head, of the value of the degree they were awarded studying under this fraud. If they themselves go on to be academics, their every job interview will have the shadow of his fraud hanging over them.

Reports have now come out that numerous students did, indeed, complain about the lack of teaching they received from Jason Arday, and they were greeted with the same response that investigative journalists received when they researched the actual qualifications and academic and other claimed achievements of this fraud — that is, they were accused of racism. I sincerely hope that every student taught by Jason Arday pursues claims for the return of their fees and compensation for the loss of the education against every university at which he taught them; and I hope that these are sufficiently ruinous to bring these institutions down as a warning to other UK universities of the costs of being complicit in this fraud. Once again, charges should be brought against not only the universities whose purpose is to oversee academic excellence and not the enforcement of DEI policies of racial discrimination against White people, but also against the specific academics who created Jason Arday. That includes the thesis supervisors and examiners who passed his racist dribble, the heads of departments and schools who hired him, the board members of the DEI committees who promoted him, and all the other sycophants who celebrated his fraud.

And, finally, the sixth group of people defrauded by Jason Arday is the British people. Arday sat on numerous charities, boards, committees and other DEI institutions not only funded by the British taxpayer but devoted to the erasure of British culture and the demographic replacement of the British people in our homeland. To this end, Arday was awarded numerous honorary doctorates, fellowships and academic awards and given a correspondingly wide public platform to spread his message of hate and racial discrimination against White people.

Given the infiltration and indoctrination of every UK institution, of which the department of sociology at Jesus College, Cambridge University, is only one example among hundreds of thousands, and which includes our schools, councils, cultural institutions, media, police forces and law courts, it is highly unlikely that Jason Arday would have faced the prosecution and justice he deserved. UK courts have repeatedly made it clear that, if you’re Black, you can rape a White woman or stab a White man and received desultory and minimal sentences far lower than the White people who protest the rape or killing, and Jason Arday would have been treated no differently. It was the reporter who tried to investigate his fraud that was the object of a police investigation rather than Arday, and he would, at worst, have been sufficiently publicly disgraced that he couldn’t hold an academic post for a year or two before being awarded an even more lucrative and prestigious post at some US university devoted to the advancement of ‘scholars of colour’.

I am not happy that Jason Arday took his own life. I wanted to him to face the full force of the law under UK legislation, and for him and those who aided and abetted his fraud to pay the costs in fines, prison sentences and institutional bankruptcy. I would also hope that his example would force a review of and removal from British public life of DEI criteria, which have never been written into any UK legislation but which have been enforced on the British people by every institution, business and employer in the UK.

Arday is only one of tens of thousands of DEI hires who occupy senior positions in the public life of Britain who are also frauds, and who are committing the crime of fraud against the British people they have artificially and fraudulently been given authority over according to DEI criteria. As I said, I very much doubt that any due process, legal or otherwise, would have been implemented in what the UK has become; but now, with Arday’s suicide, any attempt to do so will be met from the woke-Left as a ‘desecration of his name’, etc.

Jason Arday’s final crime, therefore, was committed against White people, who will continue to be subjected, after his death, to the unrelenting attacks on our race, our culture, our history, our identity, our values and our continued existence to which the fraudulent life of this Black criminal was dedicated.

[Basil the Great @BasilTheGreat]

The amount of people who are certain Jason Arday wouldn't have been hounded out of his job if he was white is staggering

The reason this story got so much attention in the first place is because one of the most prestigious universities in the world went out of their way to promote a man who was so obviously a lying narcissist just because he was black

The MET Police launched a FOUR MONTH investigation into the journalist who found out he'd been lying about everything just to try and silence him

Would the MET police have tried to silence a critic of a white man? NO

Would a White man have been given such a prestigious job with next to zero scrutiny in the first place? NO

Would anyone defending Arday have given a second thought about defending a white man who did the same thing? NO

The people doing this are absolutely obsessed with the idea that non-white people just cannot be held to the same standards that society holds white people

It's racist
It's two tier
It's abhorrent

We all know where this sick DEI culture leads us, we've seen the results of it on our streets