DebateMeBro

[DebateMeBro @Debate_COAM]

@Mandlbaur @MarshallRites That's a word salad.

You need to be clearer with your communications John, otherwise you get yourself confused.

You don't know if you are arguing that your paper should be accepted as evidence or not.

[DebateMeBro @Debate_COAM]

@Mandlbaur @MarshallRites dL/dt = torque explains all of the measurements, I have no need to cherry pick.

Shall we work through it?

What coordinate system do you want to use?

[DebateMeBro @Debate_COAM]

@Mandlbaur @MarshallRites Why are you posting angry John?

Is it because you are wasting your time?

[DebateMeBro @Debate_COAM]

@Mandlbaur @MarshallRites He changed the input parameters (speed of pull). That's all. This alters the balance between energy in and energy lost, allowing him to demonstrate COAM.

dL/dt = torque explains all of the measurements, I have no need to cherry pick.

[DebateMeBro @Debate_COAM]

@Mandlbaur @MarshallRites OK, if a derivation is not evidence we can ignore your paper, because it's not evidence of anything.

Your rules John, your rules get you ignored.

[DebateMeBro @Debate_COAM]

@Mandlbaur @MarshallRites You are making typos in your anger. Don't post angry John.

[DebateMeBro @Debate_COAM]

@Mandlbaur @MarshallRites You are dismissing the simple vector algebra derivation from Newton's laws.

You are dismissing the evidence from planetary motion.

This is because you don't understand them, and every time you claim "it spins faster", you cement your lack of understanding. Do better.

[DebateMeBro @Debate_COAM]

@Mandlbaur @MarshallRites In English we generally say "This is not an experiment".

You are missing words in your anger. Don't post angry John.

[DebateMeBro @Debate_COAM]

@Mandlbaur @MarshallRites I saw LabRat get x2, x3, x4.

dL/dt = torque explains this all.

[DebateMeBro @Debate_COAM]

@Mandlbaur @MarshallRites LabRat got x4, by transferring energy into the system.

If you allowed your brain to think and comprehend for a moment, you'd realise that COAM *requires* this.

[DebateMeBro @Debate_COAM]

@Mandlbaur @MarshallRites Redefine it all you like, we can all see that you are only doing this because cherry picking is all you have.

Classical physics (dL/dt = torque) explains *all* of LabRat's results.

[DebateMeBro @Debate_COAM]

@Mandlbaur @MarshallRites Oh, have you found another piece of evidence, having claimed that a ball on a string is the only piece of evidence?

Are you making claims with no evidence in an attempt to win an argument online?

[DebateMeBro @Debate_COAM]

@Mandlbaur @MarshallRites It is not. This is a lie.

Most students are convinced by the derivation from Newton's laws, because they understand vector algebra.

Others are convinced by Kepler's work, and Euler's work.

Some students see the ball on a string in labs, and learn about friction.

[DebateMeBro @Debate_COAM]

@Mandlbaur @MarshallRites We can all see he also got x3 and x4. Those still count as experiments. You are redefining this because you know its indefensible otherwise.

[DebateMeBro @Debate_COAM]

@Mandlbaur @MarshallRites If it were "perfectly conserved", then LabRat would have been unable to get x3 or x4. But he can. So it's not perfectly conserved.

Mass is perfectly conserved. You can shove a ball faster or slower, and its mass stays the same. The "angular energy" of a ball is not.

[DebateMeBro @Debate_COAM]

@Mandlbaur @MarshallRites "it always spins faster" is not the evidence for COAM that anyone else takes.

This is a strawman you have constructed, because you don't understand the actual evidence.

[DebateMeBro @Debate_COAM]

@Mandlbaur @MarshallRites If it changes, then it is not "perfectly conserved"

You are making a claim using technical language that you clearly don't understand.

[DebateMeBro @Debate_COAM]

@Mandlbaur @MarshallRites There is significant torque in a ball on a string, because it stops. Every time. 100% energy loss.

[DebateMeBro @Debate_COAM]

@Mandlbaur @MarshallRites Not a very conserved quantity then, this "angular energy" is it.

[DebateMeBro @Debate_COAM]

@Mandlbaur @MarshallRites There is significant torque in a ball on a string, because it stops. Every time. 100% energy loss.

(lol at SIRI getting words wrong. Google tells me that even checking your phone at a red light is forbidden in South Africa. https://t.co/kCz8bFd6x4)