Deb

Conservative, constitution supporting mom, grandma

[Deb @Debeda403]

@OperHealAmerica 5

[Operation Heal America @OperHealAmerica]

What will it take for God to heal our land (select one)?🙏🇺🇸

1. Humble ourselves
2. Pray
3. Seek His face
4. Turn from our wicked ways
5. All of the above

[Trump Lover❤🇮🇳🇺🇸 @SUBRATA30016572]

Who else thinks Pete Hegseth is absolutely true patriot!!?

Reply with a ❤🇺🇸!!

[Deb @Debeda403]

@EshaAA33 YESSS, illegal aliens don't belong here

[Esha @EshaAA33]

🚨 Be Honest:

Do you support masked ICE agents waiting outside courthouses to arrest undocumented migrants?

A. YES

B. NO

[Deb @Debeda403]

@POTUSupporters Only 1 night???

[Donald J. Trump Supporters @POTUSupporters]

Did she deserve this?

[Deb @Debeda403]

@MilitaryCooI HERO❤️🙏🙏🙏😪

[Military Support @MilitaryCooI]

Medal of Honor: Sgt. Peter Charles Lemon, Vietnam W@r, April 1, 1970

The attack came in waves. Fire Support Base Illingworth was being overrun, and Peter Lemon was right in the middle of it. He fought until his machine gun failed. Then his rifle failed. But he kept fighting anyway. With grenades in hand, Lemon pushed back the enemy closing in on his position-even chasing one down and finishing the fight in hand-to-hand combat.

Already wounded, he went back into the fight. He carried a wounded teammate to safety, then turned around and ran straight back into gunfire. Hit again. Then again. Still, he didn't stop. When the line was about to break, Lemon charged forward, throwing grenades, engaging the enemy up close, and forcing them back.

Bleeding and exhausted, he climbed up, fully exposed, and manned a machine gun, firing until his body gave out. Even then, he refused evacuation... until every other wounded soldier was taken care of first.
Peter Lemon didn't just hold the line-he became it.

[Steve Shultz @elijahliststeve]

This is what elite narcissism looks like: rules for you, excuses for them, outrage when consequences arrive. Follow the account for more insight.

[Deb @Debeda403]

@realdanieltitus AMEN 🙏❤️

[Daniel Titus (The Preacher) @realdanieltitus]

AMEN

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

They sure put a lot of effort into this crime

[Aakash Gupta @aakashgupta]

Apple just sued OpenAI, and the wildest part is how they got caught: one candidate screenshotted confidential Apple files on his Apple work laptop hours before his OpenAI interview. Apple reads its own server logs. The recruiting pipeline generated its own evidence trail.

The complaint says OpenAI's hardware chief Tang Tan, a 24-year Apple veteran, directed candidates still employed at Apple to bring "actual parts" (batteries, logic boards) to interviews for show and tell sessions. One candidate was surprised, saying he didn't even know you could take those out of the office.

Apple also alleges Tan circulated an internal Apple offboarding document to coach new hires on dodging exit security checks, and that a departing engineer kept his Apple laptop, found a bug that still gave him access to Apple's cloud storage, and downloaded dozens of confidential hardware files after joining OpenAI.

Then the supplier: OpenAI allegedly got one of Apple's manufacturing partners to demonstrate a proprietary metal finishing technique by letting the partner believe Apple had approved it.

Over 400 former Apple employees now work at OpenAI. Apple says it flagged all of this to OpenAI in February and never got a response. Five months later, it filed.

The ask reveals the strategy. Apple wants an injunction barring OpenAI from using the secrets, the return of every file, and full discovery into io, right as OpenAI preps its first device launch and an IPO. If a judge grants it, OpenAI may have to prove the device was built clean, component by component, before it ships.

The device was supposed to run on the world's best hardware talent. Now its bill of materials is evidence.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

He takes scamming to a whole new level

[Deb @Debeda403]

@progresssCode AMEN

[Daniel Priestley @DanielPriestley]

Socialists imagine a class struggle. In their made-up fantasy the CEO is in competition with low level workers, the wealthy entrepreneur is stealing from the underpaid nurse.

In reality, workers do not compete vertically they compete horizontally.

Entrepreneurs compete with entrepreneurs. Investors outbid each other. CEOs are benchmarked against other CEOs. Nurses are hired from a pool of nurses. Etc.

The CEOs pay has no correlation to the entry level workers. The Football star on £300K a week isn’t linked to the person selling drinks in the stadium. A biotech entrepreneur raising VC capital isn’t paid relative to a cleaner.

What is linked is the demand and supply dynamic of each role.

If a company places an ad for a qualified truck driver and 150 people apply for the role, then the company knows it does not need to increase wages for that role. If the company has an open role for months, it is forced to look at the compensation package.

Same for a CEO. A board representing shareholders would like to hire a CEO for a lot less if they could. Their dream scenario would be to hire a CEO who brings in institutional investors, attracts top executives, drives innovation and growth, keeps margins steady and is a good public face for the business even under pressure. It turns out there aren’t a lot of these people looking for work and if you want one you have to pay more than other companies are offering.

The class struggle isn’t vertical it’s horizontal. CEOs are in competition with CEOs. Retail workers are in competition with retail workers. Demand and supply dynamics set the price.

Sure you can say that a CEO want’s profitability and would like wages to be lower BUT it’s not up to the CEO - demand and supply tension sets the price of workers. An Airline like RyanAir would like free pilots if they could get them but they can’t… so they pay the market rate.

The reason incomes are rising at the top and falling at the bottom is not class warfare. It’s technology and globalisation.

Technology makes basic jobs simple, remote or fully automated. At the same time tech makes executive roles more leveraged, more important and more valuable.

A CEO used to run a smaller organisation. Today a CEO who’s 2% better on a $5B company is generating $100M more. Seems sensible to try and pay a few million to get $100M.

Globalisation has put workers from all over the world in completion with each other - downward pressure on wages. Globalisation has given CEOs more market opportunities to explore - upside opportunity to unlock.

The rich are not very interested in buying houses that poor people own. The poor are not buying up the homes the rich want. They are separate groups living separate lives. Try finding the genuinely rich people whose strategy is to hoard normal residential homes - it barely exists as a thing. About 85% of landlords are people who own 1-4 properties. Super-landlords (100+ properties) are 0.2% of landlords and own a tiny fraction of the 30M homes in the UK… and they’re heavily taxed.

Class warfare isn’t real. It’s an imagined war in the minds of socialists.

Demand and supply dynamics are real. To the degree it is measured in class, it’s a horizontal competition not a vertical one.

[Chief Nerd @TheChiefNerd]

GAVIN BAKER: “Tesla and Elon have done more to decarbonize the world than all environmental activists combined.”

[Deb @Debeda403]

@gigafactories @elonmusk You guys know how to get er DONE!👏👏👏