@ConceptualJames How many thousands of elderly people passed away due to this heatwave. One summer in France something like 20,000 old people died in one heat wave.
@ShaneSchaetzel You'll wrest my King James Bible from my cold dead hands. Still the best translation in the English language save for a few, very few instances where it could be improved.
@CBHeresy Maybe that's the playbook. But it's an Icarus move and won't be successful. Americans are not stupid and would not want to risk having unrepentant Democrats get back in.
@TruthCrashout@ShadowofEzra These people talking about leaving the Republican Party and possibly tanking the Midterms should shut up about VP pick at this point. Their support for JD Vance will be the kiss of death. They think they have far more clout than they really have and they want to undo MAGA
@RealAlexJones We're tired of the circle jerk and fewer and fewer of us are listening to any of you anymore. It's too bad because I used to enjoy you: @TuckerCarlson@RealCandaceO@megynkelly@barnes_law You are causing division deliberately to ensure the City of London/WEF stays in power.
@apocalypseos@TuckerCarlson Who makes JD Hall an authority on this or anything? You would do well to have a Catholic theologian and expert on these things such as Douglas Farrow, prof. of Christian Thought at McGill in Montreal. https://t.co/LdI6U8Ljvo Protestants lack nuance.
@AThinksAloud I would only pay attention to someone like Douglas Farrow, a Catholic and a scholar on how Christians should respond to Zionism https://t.co/LdI6U8Ljvo
@roddreher Douglas Farrow, a professor of Christian Thought at McGill has a series on "Zionism from a Christian perspective" (part four yet to come) that is worthy of serious reflection. Here's a link to part three https://t.co/LdI6U8Ljvo
So let me get this straight: An "incel" from Alberta decides he's going to wage war against feminism. To do this, he drives 30 hours across the country to a Jewish neighborhood in Montreal... to shoot at police officers?
This narrative checks off every classic Laurentian boogeyman in the playbook: Albertans supposedly hate Quebec, the sexually frustrated misogynist who blames women for his failures, and the gun owner wielding a non restricted firearm that somehow slipped through the Liberals' supposedly effective gun control regime. Notice how the Quebec gun control lobby has been laser focused on the SKS, the exact weapon used in this attack, for months prior? This is the exact type of false flag slop I would expect from a midwit Laurentian glowies. This isn't even believable dude.
Let's examine the tactical logic. If someone genuinely wanted to use violence against the entities they believed had wronged them, corrupt politicians, cultural Marxist professors, pornography executives, why target armed police officers in a distant city? Why not softer, more symbolically relevant targets closer to home? Driving 3,000 kilometers to shoot at the most heavily armed and trained first responders doesn't make strategic sense; it's practically suicidal in a way that guarantees maximum media coverage with minimal operational success.
The timing is equally suspect. The Liberal government has been struggling to implement their sweeping gun ban, a policy that historically only succeeds in the aftermath of high profile mass shootings. Now they're selectively releasing manifesto details several hours after the attack, perfectly positioned to exploit politically and pin everything on this convenient mythological figure: the "incel terrorist."
Consider also that the Liberals have hemorrhaged support from Jewish communities across Canada due to their tacit endorsement of rabid pro Palestinian activists who have spent months attacking, harassing, and intimidating Jewish Canadians. This attack arrives conveniently to shift the narrative away from their betrayal of Jewish voters and back onto their preferred bogeyman: the false right wing extremist threat. It is a narrative they have relied upon since the end of World War II, whenever they need to consolidate power and distract from their policy failures.
We shouldn't forget the broader political utility here. Liberal governments have always depended on maintaining an artificially constructed hostility between Western Canada and Quebec. They position themselves as the mitigator between these supposedly irreconcilable regions while both sides remain distracted from the simultaneous extraction of wealth through various embezzlement schemes.
And for those who dismiss the possibility of orchestration entirely, remember that MK ULTRA, the CIA's infamous mind control program, was partially operated in Montreal. The infrastructure for advanced psychological manipulation was developed in this very city. To believe that the same networks of power don't still employ these tactics to manufacture crises with pre packaged solutions is, at best, willfully naive.
The script is too perfect, the timing too convenient, and the boogeymen too precisely aligned with the government's immediate political needs.