The belief in transferable skills is perhaps the most common chimera among teachers of reading. Imagine a handful of universal tools we could teach students and in so doing enable them to understand every text they read. Who wouldn’t seek out “the key to all inferences,” for example, knowing that once mastered this skill would allow our students to unlock what was unspoken in every story? Who among us would not dream such a beautiful dream?
The problem is that for all the beauty of the dream, the evidence is squarely against it.
https://t.co/XELekAo112
An MIT writing professor on his students using AI:
"I realized that for the first time as a writing professor, I had to deal with students producing words without work, which wasn’t quite plagiarism and wasn’t quite paying for someone else to do the job, but it felt like a kind of naive chicanery; a perversion of the contract between writer and reader."
https://t.co/518RAEgrgq
Schools don’t just transmit knowledge. They model norms. If students learn that rules are optional and consequences negotiable, we shouldn’t be surprised when disorder follows—first in classrooms, then everywhere else.
https://t.co/bKaRTBl4m8
Nothing meandering here. He’s telling us a story abt a profound realization re: the reasons we outsource intellectual work. Stories are vital bc they help relate complex phenomena from one human to another in a form that is memorable, portable, replicable.
@WajahatAli@MuellerSheWrote “My friend, you would not tell with such high zest
To children ardent for some desperate glory,
The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est
Pro patria mori.” ~ W. Owen
True. This includes:
1. ‘Decide the consequence for yourself’
2. ‘Use a restorative conversation’ MID LESSON
3. ‘Give them three warnings, then move them, then corridor, then chat then…’
4. ‘Do all the detentions yourself, plus admin plus follow up plus escalation’