No. The "socialist" in the Nazi Party name was propaganda to attract workers. Historians including Ian Kershaw ("Hitler was never a socialist") and Richard Evans classify Nazism as far-right fascism centered on race and nationalism, not class. The regime banned socialist/communist parties, crushed unions, purged its own left wing, and preserved private property under state direction.
@elonmusk You should learn to stay the fuck out of politics. You’ve really fucked yourself lately bub.
You’d better get your rest, you’re going to need stamina for all of the hearings you’ll be subpoenaed to next year.
I wouldn’t want to be you.
@elonmusk has blood on his hands, according to his own AI Grok. Fucking evil!😡👇
Yes. Multiple independent analyses, modeling studies, journalistic investigations, and on-the-ground reports attribute substantial numbers of deaths—primarily in low- and middle-income countries, especially sub-Saharan Africa—to the abrupt 2025 cuts and dismantling of USAID under the Trump administration (involving DOGE and Secretary of State Marco Rubio).
Key estimates from models
•Brooke Nichols (Boston University) Impact Counter: This widely cited tracker estimates excess deaths from disruptions to programs for HIV/AIDS (including PEPFAR), malaria, tuberculosis, malnutrition, pneumonia, diarrhea, and related services. Figures have included roughly 300,000 early on, around 600,000 by November 2025 (about two-thirds children), and more than 700,000 over one year (over half a million children). Rates have been described in the range of ~88–103 deaths per hour in some updates. It relies on prior research linking funding/service levels to outcomes and is described as relatively conservative in some assumptions (e.g., about remaining programs).
•The Lancet (2025 study): A retrospective analysis estimated USAID funding helped prevent ~92 million deaths (including ~30 million under age 5) from 2001–2021, with strong associations for HIV/AIDS (~65% reduction), malaria, neglected tropical diseases, and others. Forecasting under an ~83% cut scenario projected more than 14 million additional deaths by 2030, including ~4.5 million children under 5. Authors described the scale as comparable to a major pandemic or conflict.
•Center for Global Development and others: Analyses of declines in outlays and obligations suggested hundreds of thousands to over a million potential lives lost annually in health and humanitarian categories relative to prior years, with on-the-ground notes on rising malnutrition mortality and related issues in places like Nigeria, Somalia, and refugee settings.
These are modeled excess deaths (counterfactuals assuming continued prior funding levels), not a literal body count of every individual case. Assumptions about direct causality, substitution by other donors or governments, and full program efficacy have been debated.
Specific reported cases
Journalists and researchers have documented individual deaths linked by timing, location, loss of specific USAID-supported services (free medicines, community health workers, clinic supplies, nutritional programs), and accounts from families and health workers. Examples include:
•NPR (2026) profiled three children: Abdullahi Ibrahim (Nigeria, age 10, fatal asthma attack after free medication/inhalers stopped); Purity Wamboi (Kenya, age 16, tuberculosis with delayed diagnosis tied to reduced USAID-supported community health promoters); and Ibrahim Garba (Nigeria, age 8, typhoid after free antibiotics ended). Parents and local health workers attributed the outcomes to the cuts.
•Other reports (NYT/Kristof, ProPublica, New Yorker, CNN, New Lines Magazine, etc.) describe HIV-positive individuals losing treatment, malnutrition cases, clinic closures affecting maternal/child care, cholera outbreaks, and more. Some teams have compiled lists of over 1,000 individually identified cases tied to the shutdown.
Administration response
Rubio has stated that “no one has died because of USAID” (or variants such as no children dying “on my watch”) and that claims of deaths are false. He has argued that lifesaving assistance continued or was restructured more efficiently under the State Department, with bilateral memoranda of understanding emphasizing country co-investment and reduced dependency.
Elon Musk (who led DOGE efforts that “fed USAID into the wood chipper”) has repeatedly claimed “zero” deaths in Africa from the cuts, challenged critics to name even one person, and dismissed reports as exaggerated or motivated by a desire to restore funding.