Maya is wrong about the law.
Again.
Supreme Court ruled on the meaning of words in the Equality Act (against the express intent of Parliament in passing the Equality Bill). The Supreme Court did not require service providers exclude trans people from gendered aligned services.
The Government's Office for Equality and Opportunities has published their impact assessment on the new EHRC code of practice.
They say the new codes is detrimental for those with protected characteristics of gender reassignment, disability and sex
The biggest rollback of disability rights in a generation’ – Charities respond to Supreme Court ruling
The Supreme Court has now stripped trans people and the severely disabled of their rights and dignity.
This is scary
https://t.co/O6FDCMrKhZ
The BMA speaks out against the EHRC's transphobic update to the Code of Practice for services.
Queue a 20 tweet thread of a former Commissioner crying
https://t.co/Vbs6Q7sJ3B
🚨DR UK's Statement on the EHRC's New Code of Practice
"We are appalled at implications that an adequate workaround is trans people using Disabled toilets instead. We will not be used as a loophole in the wider erosion of trans rights."
Full statement👇
https://t.co/2eZAsJXdzV
BREAKING: Our latest FOI investigation regarding trans women using local authority controlled single sex spaces in 2025.
"Sixty of the sixty-two Unitary Authorities responded to our FOI request – Only ONE complaint was found".
https://t.co/unnrRDDzUk
Everyone deserves to feel safe in public life.
But the growing threat of legal action against trans‑inclusive organisations risks silencing the very groups working to make that possible.
I’ve raised this urgently with the Culture Secretary, pressing for clarity on how the Government will support inclusive organisations in this uncertain climate.
They know the British public won't choose to go out of their way to display hate to a minority and deny them service. Now they have to threaten the money of organisations that are struggling. This is hate and should be stopped.
Sex Matters have hit their low. Despite years of creating a hostile media and political landscape they are now being clearly told by large corporations and lawyers that they can't enact the law as they describe in all cases.
Now they're telling their followers to follow them and all take out claims against organisations that don't match their misinformation of the Equality Act.
Dear TERFs
Some facts about the Sex Discrimination ACT
-Gives 'protection' FROM discrimination; not a right TO discriminate
-"Sex' is neutral; it also protects men
-It does not give you any "sex based rights"
-Its scope is limited to specific areas of public life
A retail worker asked a customer to refer to the company policy. This was the right response. For that this Sex Matters trustee & legal team member spent the day doxxing him on this site. This is harmful. Also member of @OldSqChambers. @ChtyCommission wake up pls
This is what is called doxxing. If it leads to real life harassment it can be a criminal offence. The M&S employee being doxxed did nothing wrong.
But this is symptomatic of what TERFs like @anyabike do. They harass, bully & menace. We need to call this behaviour out.
Malcolm Clark isn’t just anti the T, it’s the LGB too & here we see Sex Matters Trustee Anya Palmer (who doxxed the identity of the M&S Manager, who had to deal with the Terf auditor in Colchester) jumping in to confirm the OPs gay slur.
Is Sex Matters a charity or a hate group?