Hi Zack, I'm a British-born Israeli who was stabbed 18 times by a Palestinian terrorist. Another chopped up my friend in front of my eyes. One got out in the hostage deal. They were paid a salary for years by the UK gov.
Could you tweet: "all of this is a horrific crime. He should be held to account."
Thanks
Good news. My patriotic friend @LordWeirDUP won the Private Members’ Bill ballot, and has just introduced a Bill to prohibit any change in the sovereignty of the Chagos Islands without the consent of both Parliament and the Chagossian people.
We are going to win this thing.
🇮🇴🇬🇧
A friend of mine sent me this text message, regarding her friend who got a job at a secondary school:
“Charlotte, I have to share something with you because it’s just driving me mad and you might even be able to share it with people that matter.
I’ve just started a job in a school a secondary school and I had to have an hours training in safeguarding the children.
The last bit and arguably the most important bit of the training was labelled Prevent.
As you know, Prevent is about terrorism and radicalisation.
The first slide said radicalisation with a dash- the far right
And that’s all that was mentioned nothing else he said to me this is our only concern the far right
this is in a secondary school!
The next slide showed pictures of people holding up the English flag and marching with it nothing was said just look at the pictures
The trainer then said key figures are Andrew Tate and watch the series Adolescence and you will see that the middle class parents are also one of the main problems here.
What any of that has to do with an actual far right movement? I’ve no idea I’ve seen Adolescence. It’s about in cells and male chauvinists etc . That’s not the far right. I was just gobsmacked. This is happening in schools. There was no mention of any other type of radicalisation only white boys and the far right I knew id lose the job if I said anything but wtf !?!?!”
Is this another example of a two tier system, more poisonous divisive indoctrination?
Obviously I don’t want to feel angry about the death of a boy as that would make me the tool of the far-right, so it would be helpful if the Government could tell me how I should feel. Annoyed? Irritated? Mildly anxious?
Criticizing Israel is not antisemitic.
Mentioning Israel was attacked first and suggesting better responses = criticism
Omitting the attacks and saying 'Israel is killing people' = propaganda and antisemitism
Context separates the two.
Andy Burnham will win, he’ll then become PM. However, he’ll just be more of the same as Starmer.
We’re broke. He can’t raise anymore taxes, can’t borrow more and so what will he actually do?
The only way this country will change is by cutting welfare, cutting taxes, getting people working again and then seeing growth. Real growth. Burnham won’t do any of that.
The panellists were laughing and giving Robert a hard time last night just because he is an ordinary bloke. Robert is you and me, he is your son, and he grafts for a living, something these opposing candidates never do. They weren’t just trying to degrade Robert. No, this is exactly what they think of you, the everyday Brit that works hard for a living.
Robert Kenyon fought back and gave as good as he got, Robert is exactly what this country needs, a grafter with passion for his community and country.
The woman speaks for the entire country right now. An absolutely glorious rant against Keir Starmer. And she signs off in the most quintessentially British way.
I watched this episode of QT. It's so disappointing to see how poor all of the candidates are. Burnham is seasoned so 'performed' (carefully chosen word) well, but the rest are woeful.
BBC didn't disappoint my expectations when it came to chosen audience member participation...
This exchange is so revealing. Kenyon points out the obvious - that the more people that enter a country, the more houses that country will need. But upon hearing the argument that immigration puts pressure on the housing supply, the Green candidate immediately defaults to her "I'm shocked and horrified you could ever say such a thing!" mode. The funny thing is, she ends up agreeing with him, but even then she tries to pretend he has said something appalling. This is what happens when politics is rooted in feelings rather than facts.
This exchange is so revealing. Kenyon points out the obvious - that the more people that enter a country, the more houses that country will need. But upon hearing the argument that immigration puts pressure on the housing supply, the Green candidate immediately defaults to her "I'm shocked and horrified you could ever say such a thing!" mode. The funny thing is, she ends up agreeing with him, but even then she tries to pretend he has said something appalling. This is what happens when politics is rooted in feelings rather than facts.
Ed Miliband has signed the UK up to a legally binding 87% CO2 emissions cut by 2040. Paul Homewood says this can only be achieved by the devastation of industry and sharp cuts in the standard of living. Read his article in the Climate Skeptic. https://t.co/bGOg3zigaP
In Jan 2025 Starmer said @elonmusk's loud criticism of the Grooming Gangs coverup was a 'far right conspiracy theory'. Many SW1 NPCs like Lewis Whats Article 50 Goodall said it was his 'finest moment'.
But the 'conspiracy theory' was true and @elonmusk was right.
And he's right about the two-tier policing that Tories and Labour created deliberately. This is in black and white documents and HR departments and legal advice docs across the country.
Both parties were proud of it.
What's happened is the usual NPC vibe shift + Narrative Whiplash always = some glitches in the matrix.
Like -
Closing borders is bad >> Not closing borders is far right
Masks don't work >> Not wearing mask is far right
Vaccines impossible for covid >> opposing vaccines is far right
Grooming Gangs is a far right conspiracy theory >> We're starting an official Inquiry on Grooming Gangs
Putin blew up the pipeline, claims it was someone else are far right conspiracy theory >> Ukraine blew up the pipeline, Slava Ukraine!
etc etc
@TomK_Brit1993 To understand this question you need to understand what is required to build trust and what destroys it. If you created some trust, but then destroyed it, it takes massive effort to rebuild. In Starmers case its insurmountable.
Wiltshire Police has been taken to court for marching under the Pride flag. Officers didn't simply attend a local event; they marched in uniform, wore trans-themed lanyards, and ran stalls under political banners. This was not policing. It was participation in an ideological campaign. And that distinction matters more than most people realise.
Because what's unfolding here is part of a toxic revolution that has spread through every British institution – one that preaches equality but demands obedience. What used to be the impartial machinery of state has been captured from within by a new orthodoxy: Diversity, Equity, Inclusion – the soft language of the hard Left.
This is how a nation is hollowed out. Not by riots or coups, but by bureaucrats with clipboards and slogans. It begins with the soft phrases – "be kind," "celebrate difference," "diversity is our strength" – the moral lullabies of a movement that masks coercion as compassion. Then come the symbols – rainbows painted across patrol cars, the oath replaced by the lanyard. And finally, the inversion: neutrality becomes "hate," disagreement becomes "extremism," and those who refuse to accept the creed are cast out as enemies of progress.
Pride has become the state's moral test. Refusal to affirm it is treated as heresy. When police forces sponsor Pride zones and hand out stickers, they aren't serving the community – they're serving the creed. They're telling every citizen with gender-critical, conservative, or religious beliefs that their views are now beneath protection.
Sarah Phillimore, a family law barrister and co-founder of the free speech group Fair Cop, has spent years exposing how British policing has drifted from enforcing the law to enforcing ideology. Her challenge to Wiltshire Police is about more than one parade. It's about who governs Britain – the law, or the ideology that has replaced it. When judges have to remind police forces that impartiality is a legal duty, not a lifestyle choice, you know the system is rotting from within.
Every captured institution follows the same pattern: moral cause becomes policy, policy becomes dogma, and dogma becomes law. The NHS waves flags. The BBC manufactures narrative and calls it news. Our universities churn out zealots instead of thinkers. The police enforce feelings. A state once anchored in reason now runs on emotional coercion.
This is what capture looks like in the twenty-first century – not uniforms and salutes, but hashtags and training slides. It's control sold as compassion. And every time the police march under a political banner, the message is clear: allegiance to ideology now outranks allegiance to law.
The revolution happened in daylight. Most people mistook it for kindness. But behind the rainbows lies something colder – a bureaucracy that no longer serves the public, only itself.
It can still be undone, but only if the public stops apologising for wanting neutrality. The police have no business picking sides in moral crusades. Their badge should mean justice, not fashion. Because when the state kneels to ideology, the citizen kneels next.
"Sarah Phillimore, a family law barrister and co-founder of the free speech group Fair Cop, has spent years exposing how British policing has drifted from enforcing the law to enforcing ideology."
🚨 New York Democrats just voted to erase "Mother" and "Father”.
Governor Kathy Hochul will be replacing "mother" with "gestating parent" and "father" with "non-gestating parent."
This isn't inclusion, it's insanity.
While New Yorkers battle sky-high taxes, crime, and failing schools, The state is obsessed with rewriting biology and the English language. Real parents don't need woke bureaucrats redefining them.
Reject this nonsense.