AfriForum se regspan is gereed om môre in die Kaapse Hooggeregshof te veg teen onteiening sonder vergoeding.
Lees in hierdie Maroela Media-artikel wat @afriforum se regsargumente is.
Dankie aan al AfriForum se lede wie se steun dit vir ons moontlik maak om vir eiendomsreg te veg.
https://t.co/Zm8IVOZzov
so is south africa going to have its own shame parade of medical and political orcs who brought disgrace upon their professions, ignored human rights and destroyed countless small businesses for made up reasons so many ordinary people could se right through right from the start?
I'm excited to share that I'm currently backing an incredible campaign on BackaBuddy. Join me in making a difference by following this link! https://t.co/Kp6X5ygvp5
This conflates two issues that Koos Malan addressed years ago already in the context of the courts.
The courts are eager to be fiercely against the ANC when it is a matter of corruption. Why? Because corruption distracts the government from its totalitarian project of social engineering (Transformationism).
The courts support the state's deeply problematic agenda, which is why they will attack the state when it decides by itself to abandon that agenda.
The same applies to News24 and the press in general. They support the fundamental assumptions of ANC policy wholeheartedly. That is why they go after the ANC when it allows corruption to get in the way of achieving that policy.
@JacquesBroodryk@MaxduPreez Jy is bang ne @MaxduPreez!!. Baie bang...almal van julle. Pasop...die Boere kom! En wat julle die bangste maak is dat daar NIKS, ABSOLUUT NIKS is wat julle daaraan kan doen nie! Haha
@kalliekriel reponds to the latest @News24 “hitpiece”.
@News24 is desperately trying to concoct a political narrative about AfriForum to suite their political agenda.
This is not journalism, this is political activism.
They will continue to fail in these attempts, and we will continue to build on our work.
The SA Government psyop, “Afrikaners vir SA”, made three points to the US ambassador, @BrentBozell.
Allow me to respond to each below:
1) “Afrikaners are diverse and cannot be reduced to a single political or social bloc.”
- Yes, and you represent the leftist, godless, pro-government minority of Afrikaners who believe Afrikaners should be punished for the “sins of their fathers”.
2) “Crime affects all South Africans. Singling out one community as special victims distorts reality and creates division.”
- No one ever claimed crime doesn’t affect all South Africans. Farm murders, however, aren’t normal crime: farm murder rates are statistically 3x the national average, uniquely brutal, encouraged by political parties and denied by the SA government.
3) “Afrikaners vir SA identifies with the larger South African nation of 63 million people and wants to make the country work together for everyone.”
- Yes you identify with the rest of SA, so you do not represent nor promote Afrikaner issues. You align yourself with the majority, who are disenfranchising the Afrikaner minority. You have hereby disqualified yourself from representing Afrikaners.