@leTeromik Rester au top niveau compétitif et devoir dépenser 150-300€ à chaque fois qu'un nouvel archétype sort, c'est extrêmement difficile financièrement !
Déjà qu'il n'y a que deux scéances de ciné pour voir The Legend Of Hei II (VOST), on découvre lors de la 1ère que "les sous-titres ne nous ont pas été fourni avec le film".
C'est très con ça @ugcdistribution
Ça veut dire que vous ne vérifié vos film avant de les projeter ?
200000 signatures contre la loi Yadan, dont 100000 en 24h et 170000 en 48.
Il en manque encore 300000 d’ici le 16 avril où elle sera étudiée à l’Assemblée
Fais signer tes amis, tes parents, Douglas le chien, le beurre, l’argent du beurre et la crémière !
https://t.co/e6Fctb7Ifi
Bonjour monsieur le garde des Sceaux. Une erreur a dû se glisser dans le texte déposé au Sénat : il ne contient aucune disposition augmentant les moyens de la justice. Je ne puis croire que vous mentiez : pourriez-vous déposer un projet rectifié ? Merci. https://t.co/afdJvom7A1
We are looking for new French Translators!
Please share this with anyone you think might be interested!
Submit your applications by March 30th at 11:59 PM EST.
The forms link is in the comments.
Square Enix has released the new Chrono Trigger Orchestral Arrangement - Melodies Across Time album worldwide today digitally on iTunes and Amazon Music featuring 10 tracks: https://t.co/EoTifCBx77
@HariPKMN Buff de posipi/negapi, les pikachu clones iconiques des combats duo.
Faut leur donner le terrain elec, farceur, rework le talent plus/minus, une attaque genre Par Ici.
Parce que se faire dépasser en usage par muciol c'est la honte !
🚨 Everyone told me a small creator can't legally beat YouTube.
I proved them wrong. WON the case. Got the official decision.
🤯 Turns out the REAL impossible part isn't winning.
It's getting YouTube to acknowledge you WON.
This story proves YouTube's system is designed to crush the creator.
Here's what happened when I fought back: 👇
JUNE 2024: I get the email every creator dreads. My channel is demonetized for "reused content."
I fight back. I appeal, and luckily, get a human review.
A HUMAN at YouTube actually reviews my work. My editing timeline, my scripts, my voiceovers. They see it all because I sent them a 5-minute video of my whole creation process.
✅ Their verdict?
"This is original content. You follow all guidelines." Monetization restored.
A human saw my work. A human validated me. I was safe.
🛑 But I was wrong.
NOVEMBER 2024: My channel is TERMINATED.
🚫 The reason? "Spam, deceptive practices, and scams."
🤔 Wait... how? A human JUST cleared me months ago. Since I was verified by a YouTube employee, I knew my content was fine. I was creating EV news/car review videos that the YouTube Team had already accepted. Yet, the AI bot didn't care this time.
I appealed again. This time, it wasn't a human. It was an AI. Instant rejection. No explanation.
This is where most creators give up. But for me, it felt so unfair that I couldn't accept it.
As an EU citizen, I found legal options most creators don't know about.
⚖️ I took my case to ADROIT, an official EU legal dispute body. I wasn't just appealing to YouTube anymore. I was forcing them to defend their decision in a legal arena.
YouTube had every chance to defend themselves and show what I violated.
And on July 23, 2025, the decision arrived.
The verdict (see screenshot):
✅ "Complaint is UPHELD"
✅ "YouTube's termination was NOT RIGHTFUL"
✅ "YouTube failed to specify the violating content" and my channel should be reinstated.
🛑 YouTube terminated my channel, calling it "Spam, Deceptive & Scam."
🟢 The European Union Certified Dispute Body reviewed my content and found the OPPOSITE: my content is LEGIT.
HERE IS WHAT THE INDEPENDENT ADJUDICATOR FOUND (see screenshot):
1️⃣ I am Credible: "The Complainant has submitted a credible and detailed account of the content creation practices."
2️⃣ My Content is Original: "These include original scripting, lawful use of licensed media assets, and adherence to editorial standards."
3️⃣ I Followed the Rules: My content is "consistent with the platform's published guidelines."
THE REALITY:
🟢 A human legal expert reviewed my work and saw Original Content.
🛑 YouTube's bots saw "Spam."
‼️ Here's where it gets terrifying!
My channel is STILL terminated, even though YouTube's actions were against the law and I have the legal document to prove it.
Who is not being honest here?
🟢 Me, who opened my content to an independent auditor?
🚫 Or YouTube, who never provided a single piece of proof of my "violations"?
So I have:
✅ An independent legal body finding my content creation practices credible
✅ YouTube's own June 2024 human review finding full compliance of my content with the policies
✅ All my content confirmed to be legitimate by the dispute body
✅ A legal decision that YouTube violated the law
YouTube has:
❌ No specific evidence
❌ Contradictory past assessments
❌ Violated procedural law
YouTube's silence about my termination is 100% intentional.
➡️ Responding = admitting their AI was wrong and they broke the law.
➡️ Admitting = accountability.
➡️ Accountability = actually fixing things.
➡️ Easier to ignore one creator than fix a broken system.
❗️They're really hoping I shut up about it. But I'm not going anywhere.
🆘 I need your help:
🔄 RT this and tag @TeamYouTube
Please make them listen, so they can't pretend that nothing happened. It's time for answers!
If they can do this to me AFTER I won the decision, what chance does any creator have?
#YouTubeAIWrongedCreators @YouTube@YouTubeCreators@YouTubeInsider
I did what 99% of creators think is impossible - I legally defeated YouTube.
How does YouTube react? They're pretending it never happened.
Let me tell you a story that proves the system is designed to crush creators - even when you WIN legal case and the law is on your side 👇
➡️ June 2024: My channel "Chase Car" (20k subs) gets demonetized for "reused content."
I appeal. A HUMAN reviewer checks everything - my editing timeline, voiceovers, scripts.
They email me: "This is original content, you follow all the guidelines." Monetization restored. I'm relieved. A human verified me. I'm safe now.
➡️ November 2024: I wake up to find my entire channel TERMINATED. Same content. Same videos. Different result. Reason: "Spam, deceptive practices and scams policies".
Wait... what? A human JUST cleared me months ago. Since I was verified by a YouTube employee, I knew my content was fine. I was creating EV news/car review videos that the YouTube Team had already accepted. Yet, the AI bot didn't care this time.
I appeal → INSTANT rejection from the AI bot.
Most creators give up here. But as a European Union citizen, I have the opportunity to defend myself as a creator using European Union law. I filed a formal case with ADROIT, an official European Union certified dispute body.
March 2025: Case filed.
July 23, 2025: Decision arrives (attached)
The verdict:
✅ "Complaint is UPHELD"
✅ "YouTube's termination was NOT RIGHTFUL"
✅ "YouTube failed to specify violating content" and my channel should be reinstated.
An independent legal body ruled YouTube was WRONG. The best part? YouTube defended itself during the process but could not show what I had violated. I WON.
Here's where it gets terrifying - My channel is STILL terminated.
I've been emailing YouTube's legal team for 4 MONTHS. Bot replies and complete silence.
I never gave up; I fought fairly for my rights as a creator using the tools I had, and I won fair and square. Yet, they're acting like it never happened and the decision doesn't exist.
Think about that for a moment. Even when you:
➡️ Follow every rule
➡️ Have a YouTube employee confirm that your content follows the policies
➡️ Win an official legal case
➡️ Have a documented decision that your channel should be reinstated
...YouTube's AI system just ignores you, and contacting a human is impossible.
If they can do this to me AFTER I won, what chance does any creator have?
I'm not giving up. I am filing a complaint with the Irish regulator @CNaM_ie to force YouTube to honor the decision.
But I need your help: RT this and tag @TeamYouTube .
Make them respond, so they can't pretend this isn't happening.
Because if they can ignore a legal ruling, no creator is safe.
#YouTubeAIWrongedCreators @YouTube@YouTubeCreators@YouTubeInsider
Une dessinatrice italienne invitée dans un festival, renvoyée manu militari parce que le ministère de l’Intérieur l’a jugée « indésirable ».
Aucune infraction, aucun trouble, aucun motif sérieux. Juste un pouvoir qui décide qu’une artiste devient une menace pour avoir participé à un hommage antifasciste.
Nous y sommes, c’est ça, la dérive autoritaire que nous dénonçons depuis des années : un État qui expulse en silence, intimide les artistes, transforme l’engagement social en faute politique.
La France, pays de culture et de liberté d’expression, réduit au bon vouloir d’un fichier opaque et d’une police qui agit comme celle d’un autre temps.