Postgres vs MySQL.
๐ฃ๐ผ๐๐๐ด๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ is built as a single, integrated system, and that design choice shapes how everything else works.
Data is stored in heap tables, where multiple row versions coexist. Updates create new versions, while old ones remain until cleaned up (VACUUM). MVCC is built into the data model, enabling advanced indexing and extensibility.
๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ is built around a pluggable storage engine architecture.
The SQL layer sits on top, while InnoDB handles storage. Old row versions are kept in undo logs and reconstructed when needed. Data is organised as a clustered index, with the primary key defining physical layout.
Which database do you prefer?
โโ
Thanks to our partner Kickresume who keeps our content free.
๐๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐'๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ณ๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ฝ ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ท๐ผ๐ฏ ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐น๐ ๐๐ผ? Keep track of every application with Kickresume's free Job Application Tracker.
Track your applications here โ https://t.co/TZsm6HU2nX
โโ
โป๏ธ Repost to help others learn databases.
Anthropic's modelling stack writes ribosome scripts that run the translation instead of animating it
Most ribosome visuals are choreographed, which means the animation can only ever show what someone already believed.
Here the ribosome is a script with rules, and what you watch is whatever those rules produce when you feed it a real sequence:
> Encode: each step is written as a condition, not a keyframe
> Feed: an actual mRNA sequence goes in, codon by codon
> Run: the ribosome moves because the rules fire, not because a timeline says so
โข What emerges that nobody animated
> It stalls on rare codons, exactly where the tRNA pool runs thin
> A frameshift happens on its own when the sequence sets one up
> Two ribosomes on one transcript collide, because nothing stopped them
โข Why a script beats an animation
> Change the sequence and you get a different movie, not a re-render request
> A behaviour that surprises you is a result, not an artistic choice
> The same script runs 10,000 sequences overnight and reports the odd ones
โข Where it stays honest
> Every rule traces to a measured rate, not a guess
> A step with no rate in the literature refuses to run silently
> The output logs which rules fired, so a weird result is debuggable
One sequence translates in real-time-equivalent in about 40 seconds.
And the part that broke my brain:
Every animation I'd seen showed translation running at one smooth constant speed.
Fed a real gene, the script stalled three times and one of the stalls is documented.
Same process. One version could only show what its animator knew.
The hard part was never drawing the ribosome.
It was letting it do something nobody scripted โ
๐๐๐๐ก๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ซ๐ฃ๐๐๐๐ก๐๐ ๐๐ก ๐ข๐ก๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฅ๐๐ ๐๐ช๐ข๐ฅ๐
If you're confused about the difference between AI & ML, Gen AI, AI Agents, and Agentic AI, think of them as layers.
Each layer adds more capability.
๐๐๐ฌ๐๐ฅ ๐ญ โ ๐๐ & ๐ ๐
This is the foundation.
It includes:
โ Machine learning
โ Natural language processing
โ Reasoning & problem solving
โ Neural networks
โ Learning from data
This is where modern AI systems begin.
๐๐๐ฌ๐๐ฅ ๐ฎ โ ๐๐๐ก ๐๐
Generative AI builds on these foundations to create new content.
โ Text
โ Images
โ Audio
โ Video
โ Code
LLMs and Transformers are major building blocks here.
๐๐๐ฌ๐๐ฅ ๐ฏ โ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ก๐ง๐ฆ
Now AI moves beyond simply generating content.
Agents can:
โ Understand goals
โ Break tasks into steps
โ Use tools
โ Manage context
โ Schedule tasks
โ Execute actions
โ Validate results
This is where AI starts becoming action-oriented.
๐๐๐ฌ๐๐ฅ ๐ฐ โ ๐๐๐๐ก๐ง๐๐ ๐๐
Agentic AI describes the broader system around autonomous agents.
It can involve:
โ Multi-agent collaboration
โ Memory systems
โ Feedback loops
โ Dynamic tool use
โ Agent coordination
โ Failure recovery
โ Observability
โ Governance & guardrails
โ Human-in-the-loop oversight
The goal isn't just to make AI smarter.
It's to make AI systems capable of working toward goals reliably.
๐ง๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐ช๐๐ฌ ๐ง๐ข ๐ฅ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ฅ:
๐๐ & ๐ ๐
โ Learn from data
๐๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐
โ Generate content
๐๐ ๐๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐๐
โ Execute tasks
๐๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ฐ ๐๐
โ Coordinate systems that can reason, plan, act, observe, and adapt
๐ง๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐๐๐ง:
From:
โ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ ๐๐ฒ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ ๐๐ ๐ด๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฎ๐ป๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐?โ
To:
โ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ ๐๐ฒ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ฒ๐บ๐ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ๐๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐น๐ฑ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ธ๐?โ
That shift is what makes agentic AI so interesting.
๐ฆ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐ณ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐บ๐ฒ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐น๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ.
Follow @AamirAnsar94694 for more AI, tools, automation and tech insights.
#AI #AgenticAI #AIAgents #GenerativeAI #ArtificialIntelligence #MachineLearning #AITools #Automation
System Architect 2027 is now commercially available!
It features support for ArchiMate 4 -- now part of the core feature set vs being a paid add-on; resizable dialogs; display of properties outside symbols & a bevy of other new features.
More here:
https://t.co/FSreT6fe0v
๐ ๐๐ฃ ๐๐ ๐๐ฃ๐.
An ๐๐ฃ๐ defines how software systems communicate through specific endpoints, requests, and responses. It gives applications a structured way to access data or trigger functionality in another system.
๐ ๐๐ฃ gives AI applications a standardized way to discover and use external tools, data, and resources. Instead of building custom integrations for every AI client, an MCP server exposes capabilities through a common protocol.
APIs expose functionality to software. MCP standardizes how AI applications discover and interact with that functionality.
But once AI sits behind an API, the request-response model gets harder.
Inference might take longer than the request can stay open. It might fail halfway through. It might need to be retried.
That changes how the API itself should be designed.
Oracleโs guide breaks down how to design for that with asynchronous jobs, workers, durable state, and predictable API contracts.
๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ด๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ โ https://t.co/YIJ4uDSgRA
What else would you add?
โโ
๐ Thanks to @OracleDevs for sponsoring this post.
โ Follow me ( Nikki Siapno ) to improve at AI and system design.
THERE'S NOW A QUANTUM PROCESSOR IN SPACE.
An international team put a small photonic quantum processor on a nanosatellite, launched it on a SpaceX Falcon 9, and ran it in low Earth orbit for eight months and the paper came out last week.
The machine is tiny, a source that makes pairs of photons, a glass chip that routes them through six programmable paths, and six detectors to catch them at the end.
The launch broke it almost immediately with three of the six detectors failing, radiation kept degrading the three that survived. So the team reprogrammed the chip from the ground to route photons toward the working detectors and turned up the voltage on the damaged ones to claw back signal.
Although it still did the one thing it was sent to prove. Two identical photons meeting on the chip interfered the way only quantum particles can, with a visibility of 0.908, well above the 0.5 ceiling classical light can reach.
Satellites already collect far more data than they can send back down, most of what an imaging satellite sees gets thrown away before it ever reaches Earth. A processor in orbit that can crunch that data on board changes what a satellite is worth. The same photons that compute can also be sent between satellites, which is exactly how a quantum internet gets built, China already runs quantum encryption links from orbit, and IonQ is putting optical terminals into space.
Space turns out to be a natural home for photonic quantum hardware, no atmosphere to scatter the light, nothing but vacuum between nodes.
It hasn't processed any satellite data yet, and two photons is a long way from useful.
$INFQ $IONQ $QNT
It blows my mind how few people have implemented this setup. A year ago, this exact system allowed me to automate 90% of my tasks and expand my business
Andrey Karpathy, co-founder of OpenAI, dropped a simple idea that generated 22 million views and 108,000 saves "stop relying on AI strictly for generating code, and start leveraging it to build a personal second brain"
The logic is straightforward:
You link Claude Code to a specific directory and throw in any reference materials (articles, meeting transcripts, or PDFs) The system analyzes the text, maps out connections, and constructs a living repository of everything you know. It compounds continuously: as you feed it more data, the entire ecosystem becomes significantly smarter
How it breaks down in practice:
Launch Obsidian, set up a new repository, and connect it to Claude Code
Feed in the template based on Karpathy's wiki approach and instruct Claude to deploy the architecture
The model automatically constructs three core areas: raw for your incoming documents, wiki for organized pages, and a master CLAUDE file that coordinates all processes
Move any new resource into the raw folder and issue a quick command to process it
Query your entire personal knowledge base whenever you need answers
A quick five-minute deployment means you will never have to initiate a prompt from a blank canvas again
I published the complete guide in the article. Make sure to bookmark it for later
SQL is the language behind a lot of AI work.
Before a model is trained, a dashboard is built, or a business question is answered, someone has to turn raw data into something trustworthy.
That takes more than knowing SELECT and WHERE.
A practical SQL learning path looks like this:
โ Start with the basics: filtering, sorting, aliases, and CASE WHEN to shape the result you need.
โ Connect the data: joins and EXISTS help you work across related tables without losing track of which rows belong together.
โ Summarize it: GROUP BY, aggregates, and HAVING turn transactions into useful metrics.
โ Ask deeper questions: CTEs, subqueries, and window functions make it possible to rank records, compare periods, and calculate running totals.
โ Build reliable pipelines: MERGE, transactions, deduplication, incremental loads, and validation help keep datasets current.
โ Make queries efficient: indexes, partitioning, query plans, and execution costs matter as data volume grows.
For data and AI professionals, SQL also reaches into cohort analysis, feature extraction, training datasets, and RAG data preparation.
The goal isnโt to memorize every command on this map. Itโs to understand how data moves from source tables to a result someone can trust.
Which part of SQL would you add to this learning path?
๐Microsoftโs Full-Stack AI Ecosystem is Here โ End-to-End Innovation
From research โ design โ development โ deployment, Microsoft is building one of the most complete AI ecosystems in the world.
What stands out? Itโs not just tools โ itโs an integrated AI stack ๐
๐น Models
From Azure GPT-5 to Phi-4 and Florence โ powering next-gen intelligence
๐น Frameworks
Semantic Kernel, AutoGen, Magentic One โ enabling scalable AI systems
๐น Responsible AI
Security, governance, and compliance built-in (not added later)
๐น Productivity
AI embedded into everyday tools like Excel, Teams, Outlook
๐น Coding
GitHub Copilot + VS Code = faster, smarter development workflows
๐น AI Agents
Copilot evolving into autonomous, task-driven agents
๐น Cloud Backbone
Azure powering everything โ from compute to storage to AI services
๐น Image & Video AI
Designer, Copilot Image, Sora โ redefining creative workflows
๐ก Big Shift:
Weโre moving from using AI tools โ to building AI-powered systems & agents
Microsoft is clearly positioning itself as the operating system for AI-first organizations.
๐ฅ If youโre in tech, this is the stack to watch (and learn).
๐ Which part of this ecosystem excites you the most?
๐๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ ๐ถ๐ป ๐ท๐๐๐ ๐ญ ๐บ๐ถ๐ป๐๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐. ๐๐ผ๐ถ๐ป ๐บ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ธ๐น๐ ๐ป๐ฒ๐๐๐น๐ฒ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ฐ๐๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น-๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐น๐ฑ ๐ท๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ป๐ฒ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ป๐๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป.
๐ ๐ฆ๐ถ๐ด๐ป ๐๐ฝ ๐ณ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฒ now โ https://t.co/Kj8zW95H9X
Follow @AiswaryaVenkit1 for more such insights!!
AI is moving faster than ever. ๐
These are some of the best AI apps to use in 2026โfrom coding and content creation to productivity and automation.
Which one can't you live without?
๐ฌ Mine: ChatGPT, Claude & Grok.
Want to get a quick idea about the different levels in AI Agents ?
Hereโs a breakdown of AI agent capabilities into 3 clear levels, from basic to fully autonomous.
Letโs simplify it:
1. Basics
Start here if youโre new.
Understand how LLMs like GPT work, use prompt engineering, APIs, and simple tools like calculators or vector search.
2. Intermediate
This is where agents get smarter.
They start using functions, calling tools, managing memory, and reasoning through multi-step tasks. Frameworks like LangChain come into play here.
3. Advanced
At this level, agents act almost human.
They plan, self-learn, adapt through reinforcement learning, and collaborate in multi-agent workflows, working toward complete autonomy.
AI agents are evolving fast. Knowing where you (or your tool) stand on this pyramid helps you build, evaluate, and scale smarter AI solutions.
Everyone is talking about AI Engineers, but most beginners still confuse them with ML Engineers. ๐ค
ML Engineers train and improve models using datasets, GPUs, neural networks, PyTorch, TensorFlow, Jupyter, and model optimization.
AI Engineers build real AI products using RAG pipelines, vector databases, APIs, agents, guardrails, evals, context windows, LangChain, and LlamaIndex.
ML Engineers build the brain.
AI Engineers build the system around the brain.
As MCP adoption grows, teams are moving quickly to secure how LLMs connect to tools and data. We put together 7 best practices to help you:
- Lock down supply chains
- Enforce least privilege
- Add human oversight