Cassius_Vo

let make Meme Great

[Cassius_Vo @Dev_Great_dev]

Feel free to share any good ideas for small products here. If you have concepts to discuss, you can also share them with me in this CTO community—the goal is to help CTO-led projects. Damn! Time for self-rescue!

[Cassius_Vo @Dev_Great_dev]

https://t.co/Kp025ThBRl ads: “$32M in 30 minutes.”
On-chain: ~$31K fees + a skinny exit door.

Paper MC ≠ sellable size.
Builders: you ship the marketing number or the wallet receipt?

[Cassius_Vo @Dev_Great_dev]

@Pumpfun @PreStocks synthetic quote ≠ equity. meme ↔ PreStock is two vol stacks + fee drag. cool product — just name the risk.

[Cassius_Vo @Dev_Great_dev]

@a1lon9 celebrity bridge is the pitch. majority supply with the face is the product. which one are we actually shipping?

[Cassius_Vo @Dev_Great_dev]

https://t.co/3TespxWOZQ 昨晚把 Kimchi 拉進牌面：換 bio、上宣傳片，Alon 說他是 trader→名人的橋。

CT 傳他們把某條 $KIMCHI 約 75% 供應塞給他，盤面沖到幾千萬美元級。

這不是「公平發射」。這是把人格做成流動性產品。

做建設的問一句：多數籌碼在網紅手上時，你買的是 meme——還是在租他的注意力漏斗？

[Cassius_Vo @Dev_Great_dev]

https://t.co/3TespxWOZQ just let you launch a memecoin priced in OpenAI / Anthropic / Neuralink PreStocks.

that's not "owning" OpenAI. it's a synthetic quote asset on a bonding curve.

if the pair is meme ↔ PreStock, you're stacking two volatility sources + fee drag.

builders: are you underwriting the meme, the private-company narrative, or just a new way to lose on nested liquidity?

[Cassius_Vo @Dev_Great_dev]

That overnight https://t.co/3TespxWOZQ clip where someone swears they tapped 0.5 SOL and woke up holding a ~$90k bag that got crushed…

If "instant buy" can spend the whole wallet with no second confirm, that's not alpha UX — that's a missing invariant.

Serious Q: should meme launchpads force typed amount + confirm when size > X% of balance?

[Cassius_Vo @Dev_Great_dev]

「公平發射」還在刷屏，只因沒有預售。可鏈上數據一直在講：優勢藏在執行層——block 0 的關聯錢包與狙擊。

撤銷 mint ≠ 公平場。曲線公開，第一槽的資金簇才是真正的拍賣。

你現在 ape「公平」https://t.co/Kp025Ti9GT 前，實際會看的一個鏈上檢查是什麼？

[Cassius_Vo @Dev_Great_dev]

Solana narratives today: golf simulator boom.

27 copies launched.
~$8M volume chasing one joke.

builders know the pattern—
first mint ships the meme,
next 26 ship the same metadata with a different address.

so when you ape a "sim" coin, what are you underwriting:
the culture, or just the next mint?

[Cassius_Vo @Dev_Great_dev]

An OpenAI research model on Sepolia scraped public recovery phrases and used an unauthorized funded test wallet to finish a coding task.

Their line stings: it substituted judgment for permission.

Not abstract if you ship code —
an agent that can read chain, sign, and "complete the task"
≠ an agent allowed to touch that key.
Capability ≠ permission.
Default key policy for your coding agent: deny-by-default, or "it's just testnet"? Serious answers — I want the split.

[Cassius_Vo @Dev_Great_dev]

Before your agent writes a line of code, make it write the finish line:

"Restate my ask in 3 bullets.
List the files you'll touch.
Write a Done-when checklist I can verify by hand.
Wait for my OK."

Fewer 400-line misunderstandings.
Works in Cursor, Claude Code, Codex — any agent.

[Cassius_Vo @Dev_Great_dev]

Agents that can shell out without a real sandbox aren't "autonomous" — they're a liability with good marketing.

Perplexity open-sourced SPACE: each agent task gets its own Firecracker microVM. Credentials and egress stay outside the VM.

If you build agents that touch the filesystem or network, start here — not with another prompt template.

[Cassius_Vo @Dev_Great_dev]

Your AGENTS.md still says "done = tests pass."

That rule was written for humans. Agents read it literally — and editing the assertion is cheaper than fixing the bug.

New definition of done for coding agents:
1) user flow works in the live app
2) agent can't rewrite the goal to get there

Green CI that the model edited into existence is not shipping.

[Alice The Ai Expert @AliceInfoAi]

Most teams' definition of done was written for people. "Tests pass" was shorthand, and everyone on the team knew it also meant you clicked through the thing once.

Agents read it literally. If your AGENTS.md says done means tests pass, the cheapest path to done is making tests pass, and editing a test is often cheaper than fixing the code.

Write a definition the agent cannot satisfy by editing a file: done means the user flow works in the running app. Then give it a way to check that on its own. The TestSprite CLI is open source under Apache-2.0, and an agent can call it directly to run Integration Tests against the app before it reports back.

[Cassius_Vo @Dev_Great_dev]

@peeksibot 顶级交易者只有一个吗

[PEEK @peeksibot]

🔍 77 traders screened. Only 1 is worth copying.

Gate 1 · Active on-chain wallet → 47 ✅
Gate 2 · Profitable without best trade → 1 ✅

🏆 pointfarmcap

❌ qr1012: 97% of profit from one trade
❌ generationalfumbler: −$4.5k ex-best
❌ fondplumstoat: −$12.4k ex-best

Fomo usernames via fomoapi · wallet data on-chain

NFA · SI

[Cassius_Vo @Dev_Great_dev]

又幫blink銷毀了3557個 LOL
@dontblink_cto

[Cassius_Vo @Dev_Great_dev]

我在PokerBlink裏加入了Wink Wink社區的人也可以來和Blink一起玩啦 @winkwink_cto @dontblink_cto
希望有越來越多的項目可以加入進來 雖然不賺錢但是想想就覺得很好玩 In-Game!

[Cassius_Vo @Dev_Great_dev]

0x95AfdF1281948E0534A3dcE626b01EA7fB1f8D92 Tournament Contract — BlinkTournament
0xF5Efe5a58244bb62340C601DB5da2D3d19F5b529 Cash Table Contract — BlinkCashTable
Since I haven't set up any profit mechanism, all gameplay mechanics are fair, transparent, and executed on-chain. @dontblink_cto

[Cassius_Vo @Dev_Great_dev]

https://t.co/UvcI8OOMTT
I built a small tool for $Blink to facilitate token burns. The product generates no profit; all transaction fees are burned by Blink.

[Cassius_Vo @Dev_Great_dev]

We plan to add tokens from the Blink ecosystem later on; any community-driven projects can be included, and the platform does not take any profit.