Daily Fundamental Analyst 🇨🇦 🇺🇸
I read the market so you don't have to.
$PLTR $MU $SOFI $ASTS · $BTC · Macro
Follow for setups that actually make sense ↓
@StockSavvyShay half this list is names where AI power is a rounding error. for TXN, ADI, CAT, ETN it barely moves the P&L. the actual leverage is the pure plays: NVTS, MPWR, VICR, BE, POWI. same theme, wildly different % exposure. don't buy the basket, buy the needle movers
@DudeWhoInvests "generational buy" is the wrong frame. sofi isn't distressed value like pypl getting a rescue bid. it's a bank charter growing earnings triple digits that the market re rated on rates. the setup is a rerate higher, not a floor to catch.
@coinbureau the 48t vs 10t official gap is the real tell. goldman's been tracking london OTC exports and the math only works if it's PBoC. de dollarization on autopilot. they don't care that gold's down 28% from jan, they're buying the dip in size.
the "can't afford wildfire" line is just false canada put $316M into a national aerial firefighting fleet in budget 2025 and spends over $1B a year on fires. the foreign aid is a rounding error either way. pick a real argument
the "negligible with capture" angle
$272M spread across a dozen countries is a rounding error in a $500B federal budget. the actual problem with aid isn't the line item, it's how much gets eaten by local officials before it does anything. that's the debate, not "gender rice"
@EricDLombardi "a leader who refuses to make the case for something unpopular but needed is no leader at all" this is it. running on conviction instead of vibes, good to see
@usermooseontwt unfair to gta tbh, at least the money in that game is fake.
tate's the only one here whose entire empire was reselling a get rich course to broke 16 year olds
@StockSavvyShay ceo telling you to hold his stock right after it crashed 11% is the least shocking quote of the year lol. but the math checks barclays $330 PT, worst shortage on record penciled for 2027. read the incentive, keep the numbers.
@qualtrim everyone screenshotting the $462b, nobody reading the footnote. half that jump is TPU hardware sales, not pure GCP. margins on that not equal to what people think. do you count hardware backlog as "high margin"?
@JUST_KAWS honest q for the memory bulls: at 5x forward, what multiple are you paying on normalized (non-supercycle) earnings?
Because that's the number that decides whether this ages well
@CryptoTice_ this part's actually not hype. barclays has the ai contribution falling 1.0pp → 0.2pp by 2027. berezin at bca straight up said we'd probably be in a recession without it. single engine economy, one bad capex guide away from a stall
The contradiction is real agreement subtracts operating costs, not debt, which cuts against his "no sharing till all debt repaid" line.
Whether that's a lie or him conflating the $630M actual debt with the $6.3B unrecouped contributions is the actual question.
Gap's real either way.
Everything technically checks FCC 7x is real, laser mesh relay is the actual design.
My only pushback: you're describing a moat in present tense for a constellation whose first two prototypes fly in early 2027.
Great thesis, but it's a filing and a plan, not a deployed distribution layer. Price it as optionality, not a moat.
@StockSavvyShay Nearly 10x… from a base that only exists because they're setting cash on fire right now.
Off current FCF (approximately $183B combined) it's 3.5x.
The 10x denominator is the 2027 trough on your own chart. Amazon's already FCF negative.
The spending IS the low base.
Two things can be true:
1. There was no leaked full text. Poilievre is literally writing letters today asking Carney to release it. Bloomberg reported on *terms* from sources, not a document.
2. Carney still can't square "no sharing until the debt is repaid" with "net revenue is equal after snow removal." The bridge opens in 10 days. The debt takes 50 years.
Stop overcooking it. The medium rare version already wins.
@CryptoTice_ "That's not marketing" bro, OKX tweets that exact line from their own account, linking a sponsored Cointelegraph post. It's the definition of marketing.
Downloads aren't capital.
Nobody moved size because an app hit 1 in the App Store. Show me volume and PoR, not install counts.
The dormant supply argument has one problem: those coins were dormant at $126K too. They're dormant at $63K. Nothing changed except positioning.
Here's what actually changed. July 1 swept 57.7K and took the June lows. Bounced 13.6% into 65.5K. Three red days since. That entire bounce loaded longs whose stops now sit under 62.2K and 60K.
Scarcity doesn't bid. Liquidity does. And it's sitting below, not above.
Careful with this chart. CryptoQuant published research in May saying record long term holder supply reflects a buyer drought, not scarcity coins age into LTH buckets because nobody's buying, not because holders got religion. Same data, opposite conclusion. Down 50% from the high with lost supply at ATH is the tell