There is no antisemitism. It is a boogeyman designed to give Jews privileges and powers no other group has - especially the slaughtering of Palestinians and other Arabs.
it is also designed to make Jews paranoid and easily controlled by the likes of MIlikovski.
Jews who do not want excessive rights relative to others do not need to go through life with the threat of 'antisemitism' ready to be used on anyone, anytime
-
And, most importantly: Arab Jews never knew what antisemitism was till the Ashkenazi taught them.
An early issue the Third Reich ran into was that they couldn’t always relay on rank and file soldiers to exterminate people in this fashion efficiently enough. They eventually figured out they needed specialized units of people that enjoyed this kind of work. IOF has no such need
today marks the 22 year anniversary of Rachel Corrie's murder by Israel. They intentionally crushed her to death with a bulldozer for trying to stop the demolition of Palestinian homes. After they killed her they made it a ritual to make pancakes with her face on it to celebrate
one of the few benefits of Elon Musk giving me a bluecheck without me asking for it is that I can post videos of any length. So here is the full Gaza documentary the BBC just removed from their site because genocidal Zionist freaks demanded they censor it:
Must get specific but in many cases it was neither and using the same words as for vaguely analogous phenomena in historical times is misleading. For the spread of Anatolian farmers into Europe for example, a process that started around 7000 BC or before, it was a gradual process that took millennia of the creeping spread of small tribal groups on riverways. There was no centralized political decision making in this process and almost certainly no unified political or historical identity or self-understanding as a “people” doing either migration or invasion. Similarly for the hunter gatherers displaced there was no such political self understanding or decision taking either. Neither “side” understood the process we think we see today from poorly sourced information and genetic data that’s itself often misunderstood. This question is very different from the one concerning violence, which was doubtless used in form of massacre of unprotected villages, low level personal fighting etc; however before ~2200 BC there’s no evidence of a military class existing anywhere so to speak of “invasion” in the case of Europe where hamlets existed without any protective ramparts even etc is an anachronism.