@GeoffWilsonWAM@AlboMP@JEChalmers The ”real” Australia will get an opportunity to respond in two and a bit more years. Maybe reserve outcomes until then.
@Thejimpenman The OECD’s latest figures show that general government employment in Australia is about 15.7% of total employment, compared with an OECD average of 18.4%. Countries such as Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, France and Canada all have larger public sectors by this measure.
@Bquick777@PeterSchiff@saylor All about timing. The bond rates and unemployment are signaling tougher times ahead. What good are bitcoin for the people that wanted fiat dividends?
@PeterSchiff@saylor The leverage is reduced by selling BTC so a temporary dilution of MSTR is a better move. That is IF you believe in the long term future of Bitcoin.
@KovStew@ForrestHODL Why? No need to participate in leveraged plays if you don’t want to. If any prior predictions would have come true he would have been celebrated as a genius. I really don’t see the problem.
@PiusSprenger Because at this point 12% does not represent equilibrium with risk. The extra cash on the balance sheet is still not enough to convince people that MSTR has the winning formula. Effectively an extension of the scepticism about Bitcoin.
@ausstockchick A sustainable tax system is therefore not about attacking capital or rewarding failure. It is about maintaining balance between the different ways value is created.
@ausstockchick Imagine Monopoly. At first, players earn money mainly by moving on the board and collecting wages. Over time, owning properties becomes much more rewarding than working. Those who already own the most properties collect more and more rent, while others find their wages buy less.
@PeterSchiff They have previously stated that it is tax advantages to sell “expensive” coins to repurchase less costly ones. They are working the engine built on that Fiat is not holding its value. No different to your shiny rock belief in scarcity.