Here are the key takeaways from the event hosted by @FutureofFinanc3 I presented at recently on my recently published paper, "Digital Issuance - An Optimal Model for Digital Assets and Transactions":
https://t.co/GlR4DcKy6s
#digitalissuance#assetmanagement#future#innovation
Dr Ian Hunt will be presenting on #digitalissuance at an event held by Future of Finance on 20th Sept. The event will open with a presentation by Dr Ian Hunt, author of Digital Issuance – An Optimal Model for Digital Assets and Transactions...https://t.co/TwfO33yLI8 #digitisation
@KIASILIGOLD And one more for luck! > Overall, I have taken the view that the smart token cannot issue, modify/edit or burn itself, except where there is a zero-value split, as there is in the case of a perpetual bond.
@KIASILIGOLD 4/4 where the recipient holds the undertaking from the issuer until it is fulfilled, and then returns the IOU to the issuer, to deal with at its discretion.
@KIASILIGOLD 3/4 You are right that the issuer can issue whatever tokens they wish, without limit, and there could be a model defined where either the smart token burns itself or the recipient burns it. However, the allegory I have defined is one of an IOU,
@KIASILIGOLD 2/4 Once the token is returned to the issuer, it becomes inactive, but can be reused, edited, displayed as an Indication of Interest, or just junked. This is up to the issuer, rather than the recipient.
@KIASILIGOLD 1/4 Thanks for the question! For as long as the smart token is with the recipient then it is ‘active’ and there is a risk to the issuer, including counterfeiting (illicit editing), but no benefit to the issuer.
@InvAssoc and @IAEngine invite you to our latest #TechTalk on the 19th July, where a range of speakers will discuss #digitisation, #tokenisation and #DLT!
There are only 2 weeks to go – more information and registration below:
https://t.co/gWDfR5lE27