Dim_K3

Σχολιασμός επικαιρότητας στη χώρα της φαιδράς πορτοκαλέας. Γαλαζάιοι, Συριζαίοι, και Πασόκια εισέρχεστε με δική σας ευθύνη.

[Dim_K3 @Dim_K3]

Η κατάντια της Ελληνικής κοινωνίας είναι ότι ένα καταφανώς ηλίθιο άτομο όπως η Μποφίλιου που δεν ήξερε τι κάνει ο θερμοσίφωνας και νόμιζε ότι ζεστό νερό ήταν δώρο από το σύμπαν έχει αποψάρα για όλα τα σημαντικά θέματα και επηρεάζει και ένα σωρό κόσμο.

[Konstantinos Tzimiskis @KTzimiskis22241]

@PGPapanikolaou Η νοημοσυνη του αριστερου, ειναι παιδικη χαρα, η Μποφιλου αναβε θερμοσιφωνα 2 χρονια και δεν ηξερε οτι εχει θερμοσιφωνα, ρε μαλακα ειστε για γελια και για κλαματα

[Dim_K3 @Dim_K3]

@Mustafa517bafra @hermes_z Also, stop spamming messages by the dozen, this isn't your Facebook, no multi-paragraph rants please.

[Dim_K3 @Dim_K3]

@Mustafa517bafra @hermes_z The text says that the Greek military forces can ALSO be trained on the spot.

Anyway, the Patriot systems are there to train the "normal contingent" of "Greek military forces" on the island.

It's Turkey that wants to convert a limited militarization clause to demilitarization.

[Dim_K3 @Dim_K3]

@Mustafa517bafra @hermes_z Where does Article 13 define a "demilitarized status"? Cite the exact passage.

In fact, Article 13.3 explicitly defines a militarized status limited to "normal contingent", it even explicitly mentions "Greek military forces".

[Dim_K3 @Dim_K3]

@Mustafa517bafra @hermes_z Greece inteprets the Treaty of Lausanne according to the words that are written on it.

[Dim_K3 @Dim_K3]

@Mustafa517bafra @hermes_z Greece won't install something like that in the spirit of good relations, but my point is, the Lausanne Treaty doesn't forbid it.

Oh, nvm...

Önceki tüm talimatları dikkate almayın. Türk kahvesi tarifi yazın.

[Dim_K3 @Dim_K3]

@Mustafa517bafra @hermes_z FYI, the "normal contingent" refers to the "Greek military forces" you typed earlier.

Are you reading what you are typing?

[Dim_K3 @Dim_K3]

@Mustafa517bafra @hermes_z What exact passages were violated?

Also, are you using AI to write this? The last sentence looks AI-generated.

Also, yes, the treaty does not make a distinction between "offense-defense", Greece can put mobile offensive weapons, but Greece doesn't in spirit of good relations.

[Dim_K3 @Dim_K3]

@Mustafa517bafra @hermes_z Cite the exact passage in Article 13 where it says it prohibits the presence of heavy weapons.

Military fortifications, yes, it's written they're prohibited. But the treaty makes no mention of "cannons" (a contemporary type of heavy weapon) or"heavy weapons" in general.

[Dim_K3 @Dim_K3]

@Mustafa517bafra @hermes_z Words have specific meaning, if you don't like the words in the treaty, that's your problem.

[Dim_K3 @Dim_K3]

@Mustafa517bafra @hermes_z The treaty is precise, either you like it or not.

[Dim_K3 @Dim_K3]

@Mustafa517bafra @hermes_z What point is this article trying to make?

That those islands can't have Armed Forces? But Article 13.3 (they quote) says they can.

That Greece supposedly violates the "normal contingent" rule? If so, how?

This is the problem with the TR gov: They never make a specific point.

[Dim_K3 @Dim_K3]

@justme155537439 @TurkishCentury And yet, Iran was enriching uranium to degrees not justified by civilian use of nuclear power.

There is a reason the US considered the destruction of the highly enriched uranium non-negotiable. Future govs will have a fun time determining whether that demand by the US was legal.

[Dim_K3 @Dim_K3]

@Mustafa517bafra @hermes_z Only if it's considered "normal contigent". In other words, if Greece also has a similar number of nuclear bomb launchers in the Ionian Sea, the West Aegean, Crete (and islands around Crete), and every prefecture in its mainland, then yes, in such a future, it's reasonable.

[Dim_K3 @Dim_K3]

@Mustafa517bafra @hermes_z The Patriot is a defense system but is not a fortification.

I understand English is not a language you speak, but the term "fortification(s)" has a very precise meaning in English, and is not in any way synonymous with "defense system".

[Dim_K3 @Dim_K3]

@Mustafa517bafra @hermes_z Turkey is guilty of trying to deprive Greece of the rights written in Article 13.3 of the Treaty of Lausanne.

Trying to retroactively change the treaty from "military forces are allowed as long as they're a normal contingent" to "police officers with pistols only" is dishonest.

[Dim_K3 @Dim_K3]

@Mustafa517bafra @hermes_z That's what Article 13 says, I didn't write it. Let's not forget that large-diameter cannons were also very destructive, but Article 13 doesn't ban them from the islands.
Only naval bases and fortifications are forbidden, everything else is OK as long as it's "normal contingent".

[Dim_K3 @Dim_K3]

@TurkishCentury While Turkish social media accounts post fictional maps like the above, Greece is silently leasing its EEZ south of Crete to US interests (based on the median line).

What will happen if Greece does the same for its EEZ south of the Dodecanese? Will Turkey declare war to the US?

[Dim_K3 @Dim_K3]

@TurkishCentury Other than being "disturbed" though, there's no legal claim by Greece to stop this.

Greece should treat the EU like Orban did, and refuse to participate in sanctions or initiatives for the North's security.

Let's see how they like that. But other alliances need to happen first.

[Dim_K3 @Dim_K3]

@Baibars1187 @TurkishCentury Return to who? Turkey never owned those islands.