You may wish to address your criticism instead to Professor Thomas Seyfried of Boston College, who spent fifteen years researching cancer metabolism and published Cancer as a Metabolic Disease in 2012 β a peer-reviewed, comprehensively evidenced work concluding that cancer is primarily metabolic in origin and that ketogenic dietary therapy should be first-line treatment. His work reconstructs Otto Warburg's Nobel Prize-winning observations on cellular metabolism, ignored by oncology for the better part of a century. The oncology establishment has not refuted Seyfried. It has not engaged with him at all. If the metabolic model is wrong, the field has had thirteen years to demonstrate why. The silence is not a rebuttal.
@JacquiDeevoy1 The true nature of cancer is actively suppressed. Vested interests are intent for the truth never to become widely known. Here is a potted history: https://t.co/A7W9wWXyaP
1931: Dr. Otto Warburg wins the Nobel Prize for discovering cancer cells cannot survive without glucose. They're glucose-dependent.
This suggests depriving cancer cells of glucose might treat cancer. Warburg proposes testing therapeutic ketosis: cancer cells need glucose, healthy cells run on ketones.
The hypothesis is brilliant. Clinical trials should begin immediately.
They don't.
Why? Chemotherapy research is exploding. Pharmaceutical companies can patent chemotherapy drugs. They cannot patent "stop eating sugar."
Throughout the 1960s-70s, scattered researchers test ketogenic diets for cancer. Small studies show promising results. Cancer cells shrink when glucose is restricted.
These studies are published in minor journals. No major institution picks them up. No pharmaceutical company funds larger trials.
Dr. Thomas Seyfried at Boston College rediscovers Warburg's work in the 2000s. After 15 years researching cancer metabolism, his conclusion: Cancer is metabolic, not primarily genetic. Ketogenic diets should be first-line therapy.
He publishes "Cancer as a Metabolic Disease" in 2012. Comprehensive. Meticulously researched.
The oncology establishment ignores it completely.
When Seyfried lectures at medical schools, oncologists walk out. They call his work "dangerous." Not because the science is wrong. Because suggesting diet could treat cancer threatens the entire chemotherapy industry.
Current standard cancer treatment: Poison the patient with chemotherapy, then send them home with advice to eat "healthy whole grains" that feed the cancer.
Current research funding for metabolic cancer therapy: Essentially zero.
Warburg won the Nobel Prize 95 years ago. We've known cancer is glucose-dependent since 1962.
We're still feeding cancer patients sugar and calling it supportive care.
Because ketogenic therapy can't be patented.
@Climate_Earth20 I don't know where to start or what to say. But what I do know is that you are a fighter and that you will stay strong. All the very best wishes I can muster, David.
@JacquiDeevoy1@DarrenPlymouth I agree with most things you say. Unfortunately, I am 100% certain that you are mistaken on this one. I too have investigated the possibility of a flat earth and whilst there are some discrepancies, they are insufficient to overturn reality. Nature abhors straight lines.
@UnityNewsNet Exactly. There is nothing on how they overcome the Van Allen Belts, for example. Everything must be taken on faith. They are probably (or at least the capsule is), orbiting the Earth for 8 days.
@TamDiytamatno1@BGatesIsaPyscho Good point. And we will have to take everything on good faith, from now on. For all we know, it will be in orbit for 8 days.
"Once you end up here you realise that not only are Vaccines dangerous but they are entirely redundant and the rest of the pHARMaceutical drugs will quickly follow.". It's actually worse than that. The only logical conclusion is that they are actively seeking your premature death.
βSchindlers List is a film that is a based on a book that says right in the cover it is a novel. So we have US history students lining up to see a movie as an βhistorical eventβ that is a fiction.β
@CalltoActivism No he didn't. He was good with the questions to the point of boxing her in with no escape, but then... he let her escape. He needs to improve his cross examination technique.
@DocAhmadMalik I would broadly agree with your sentiment. You cannot tar a whole race/religion with the same brush. However, if there is any truth in the post below, I will seriously start to doubt that wisdom...https://t.co/Yk2nihQHYL
ππ₯πππππ‘π π¨π¨π¨π¨π¨
Israeli settlers just set a Palestinian guy on fire in Ramallah, West Bank.
They immobilized him, poured gasoline over, and set him on fire.
https://t.co/xk80WWvywE
Did you know the news used to regularly air stories about people's lives being ruined by vaccines?
That all changed after Clinton let Pharma buy out the media.
Here I compiled 56 mind-blowing news segments they'd never air today.
https://t.co/HI2GyO0M1R