Денис Сергеевич

[Денис Сергеевич @Dinlenger]

@FairlySmok6407 Ахахахаххахахахахахаххахахааха

[Денис Сергеевич @Dinlenger]

No, the field was civilian nuclear technology. Nuclear-powered icebreakers were an additional example.

You’ve now managed to misrepresent both my original answer and your own question. Truly impressive

[Smoking Fairly @FairlySmok6407]

@Dinlenger @thesmokingdutch @sham7897456 So the field Russia is ahead in is having ice breakers.

Fucking brilliant. Truly one of the worlds countries.

You can't actually address the original ask and so now you're grasping at brain dead straws.

[Денис Сергеевич @Dinlenger]

@DayalaEC 30 лет отстает от кого, от эквадора?

Российский банкинг и сфера услуг лучше чем у многих европейских держав.
А уж Эквадорские то и подавно в уста сношает, без обид.

Про уровнь жизни ваще молчу

[Денис Сергеевич @Dinlenger]

@FairlySmok6407 Technically proved nothing, kept moving the goalposts, got mad/sad idk

Peak discourse of yours 👍

[Денис Сергеевич @Dinlenger]

The self-gaslighting is getting desperate.

1. Deployment was the point, not invention.

2. Different doctrine, same lack of a working equivalent

3. Explain why a working floating nuclear power plant doesn’t count as a technological achievement. I’m ready for your mental gymnastics

4. Mining isn’t enrichment. Please read your own source. Almost sure bout it

[Денис Сергеевич @Dinlenger]

@FairlySmok6407 Funny how your entire argument has come down to playground-level

«my dad could beat up your dad and and and we’re richer too»

[Денис Сергеевич @Dinlenger]

1. Russia deployed a maneuverable hypersonic glide vehicle years ahead of the US.

2. Decades of American research, yet no operating commercial equivalent to the BN-800.

3. Britain’s lack of interest doesn’t change the fact that Russia achieved it.

4. South Korea NEEDS enriched uranium for its nuclear power plants, yet has no domestic enrichment industry and relies on imports. Canada, Kazakhstan and Australia don’t enrich uranium either.

«They could if they wanted to». That’s hypothetical lol.

[Денис Сергеевич @Dinlenger]

SpaceX has a genuine technological edge in reusable rockets.

But by your own logic, turning an old concept into a working industrial technology counts as a novel capability.

So why doesn’t that apply to Russia’s BN-800, a fast-neutron reactor using recycled nuclear materials, something the US has yet to put into commercial operation?

[Денис Сергеевич @Dinlenger]

@FairlySmok6407 1. Avangard is a maneuverable glide vehicle, not a conventional warhead.
2. Yet the US doesn’t operate an equivalent to the BN-800.
3. Haven’t seen one yet.
4. Uranium deposits don’t give you enrichment technology.

Not a single word of cope. Just straight facts.

[Денис Сергеевич @Dinlenger]

@FairlySmok6407 Or is it all «just» something again? Just a missile, just a reactor, just a floating nuclear power plant?

Apparently everyone can build these things. Funny, I must’ve missed the British civilian nuclear-powered fleet for example.

[Денис Сергеевич @Dinlenger]

You’re the one acting like an edgelord, calling me names while struggling to even ask what you actually wanted to know until now.

But sure:

Avangard hypersonic glide vehicles
BN-800 fast-neutron reactors
Floating nuclear power plants
Uranium enrichment technology

Specific enough? Cutting-edge enough?

[Денис Сергеевич @Dinlenger]

@FairlySmok6407 If these specific measurable examples still aren’t good enough for you, then that’s a matter of your subjective judgment, not a lack of actual achievements

[Денис Сергеевич @Dinlenger]

No no no my man. You seriously need to stop this.

You asked where Russia leads. You got your answers: uranium enrichment and nuclear power plant exports.

The technology dates back to the 1950s. So what? Russia has the world’s largest uranium enrichment capacity, leads in building nuclear power plants abroad, and operates the BN-800, an advanced fast-neutron reactor using MOX fuel. It’s also developing the more powerful BN-1200M. Does the age of nuclear technology somehow make all of that irrelevant?

You weren’t prepared to accept the answers because they didn’t fit your self-constructed worldview. So you’ve been jumping from one argument to another, desperately grasping at «straws». First «novel capabilities», then icebreakers, now «technological dominance».

And even with all that bunny-hopping from topic to topic, you still haven’t disproved a single thing.

[Денис Сергеевич @Dinlenger]

@FairlySmok6407 You made zero coherent arguments against my original point. Literally zero.

[Денис Сергеевич @Dinlenger]

@FairlySmok6407 Another imaginary claim, another ‘retard’. Quite the intellectual performance

[Денис Сергеевич @Dinlenger]

@FairlySmok6407 @thesmokingdutch @sham7897456 My original point was about Russia’s leadership in civilian nuclear technology. Icebreakers were just another example.

You’ve managed to misrepresent both my point and your own question. You’re really something special.

[Денис Сергеевич @Dinlenger]

And the funniest thing about the original thread has to be your remarkably rich and varied vocabulary. Quite impressive for a native English speaker. You must be the CEO of the word «retard» by now.

«Retardedly retarding retarded retard»

[Денис Сергеевич @Dinlenger]

Btw: not me. You’re the one endlessly coping with some variation of «Oh no, not novel enough, not significant enough» according to whatever arbitrary standards you’ve invented in your head

[Денис Сергеевич @Dinlenger]

I never questioned the US’s ability to build nuclear-powered icebreakers. That’s an argument you’ve invented yourself

Russia actually builds and operates an entire fleet of them. Potential capability isn’t the same as demonstrated capability

You asked, I answered. You moved the goalposts, and I still indulged your absurdly framed follow-up

Let’s be honest: you naively expected me to blindly agree with you. You never wanted an actual debate

[Денис Сергеевич @Dinlenger]

@FairlySmok6407 @thesmokingdutch @sham7897456 By that logic a nuclear submarine is just a reactor underwater.

We’re talking about nuclear-powered icebreakers, not just reactors on ships. Russia builds and operates an entire fleet

Maybe it’s time to admit you misread and made a mistake instead of all this mental gymnastics?