Dino Turn

[Dino Turn @DinozTurn]

@s14722839 The legally corrupt. Australia’s new class of public servant politician elites

[muffy kittens 🦘🇦🇺🌷🌍🦜🐕🐕 @s14722839]

Wonder how this happened Aussies❓️ ⬇️⬇️

[Dino Turn @DinozTurn]

@FreedomAus80100 That’s the labour liberal party, the new feudalism. They believe they own you

[NoMoreGulags @FreedomAus80100]

Never forget Australian police arrested a man who yelled "blood on your hands" at the Prime Minister.

We need to absorb this

They ARRESTED a man because he made a statement they didn't like !!

Absolutely batshit.

[Dino Turn @DinozTurn]

@craigkellyAFEE Climate scammers profit on your taxes .

[Dino Turn @DinozTurn]

@RositaDaz48 Criminalise opposition. The tactic of every incompetent totalitarian leader in history.

[Rosita Díaz @RositaDaz48]

“This post needs to go viral – NOW!
So, as you might have heard, Australia’s controversial Digital ID bill was recently passed in Federal Parliament.
And no, this isn’t about logging into Medicare “more easily.” This is the wet dream of every power-drunk bureaucrat who’s ever fantasised about tracking what you eat, watch, spend, say – and even think.
Labor rammed it through with help from the Greens and Jacqui Lambie, while the likes of Pauline Hanson, Malcolm Roberts, Matthew Canavan, Ralph Babet, Alex Antic and Gerard Rennick strongly opposed it.
Experts lined up to say it was dangerous. Legal groups shredded it. Privacy advocates screamed. The public wasn’t consulted. But they damn well passed it anyway.
This bill is not about “protecting your identity” – it’s about owning it.
Without a digital ID, you will eventually have no access to a bank account, cash, Centrelink, MyGov, flights, fuel, medication, voting in elections, and even receiving parcels in the mail.
And you can kiss goodbye to ever renting a home, owning a car, using social media, shopping online, accessing the internet at all, having a phone number, and buying groceries.
They say it’s “voluntary” – just like MyGov was “optional” until 10 million Aussies were forced into it just to access basic services.
Just like the COVID-19 vaccine was “optional” until those who resisted found themselves locked out of society for months for not being up-to-date with their boosters.
It’s coercion and blackmail with a friendly smile.
And now that this thing’s been jammed through Parliament, the tech giants are lining up like pigs at a data trough. They’ve already got your search history, your online purchases, your late-night Instagram habits, and every whispered “Hey Siri” or “OK Google.”
Now they get to attach all of that to your real name, address, and government-approved ID. That “anonymous data” you thought was floating harmlessly in the cloud? Not anymore.
Your Woolies reward card is now part of your permanent “consumer profile.” Your YouTube comments? Traceable. That shady dating app you thought was private? Good luck with that when your real ID is stitched to everything you do online.
Privacy’s gone, and it’s not coming back. And let's not pretend this data won't be regularly hacked, leaked, or sold to the highest bidder.
And when the system inevitably fails? One blackout, one outage, one “oops” from some contractor, and you’re digitally locked out of your own life, while some AI bot in a call centre tells you to try turning it off and on again.
The committee that was supposed to scrutinise this bill was a total joke. They ignored almost every expert submission, skipped past glaring privacy failures, human rights concerns, and technical red flags, and still gave it the green light.
It wasn’t an inquiry – it was a rubber stamp for the surveillance state controlled by foreign nations.
Every politician who voted for this has just helped build the scaffolding for digital tyranny. This is the infrastructure for a fully centralised, always-on tracking system.
They’ll say it’s for your safety. They’ll say it’s about efficiency. What they mean is: now they know who you are, where you are, what you’re saying, who you’re saying it to, and how to shut you up when you speak too much truth.
#This isn’t progress – it’s control, plain and simple.
What we’re seeing isn’t some harmless upgrade – it’s China-style social credit wrapped in an Aussie flag, and you can bet the CCP is watching on proudly, noticing how we've finally caught up.

#StephanieMessenger

[Together @Togetherdec]

"Papers Please" to get online?

We say NO! @andyburnham @UKLabour

Social media platforms already know an extraordinary amount about their users

They can already use AI to infer whether someone is a child or teenager to a high degree of accuracy

Before putting millions of adults through an ID checkpoint to access social media, the Government and the platforms should have to explain why the information they already have isn't enough - and how requiring every single user to prove their age using government-issued ID can possibly be:

- Necessary
- Proportionate
- Or indeed safe in itself - given databases are compromised ALL THE TIME

#dontidtheinternet

[Dino Turn @DinozTurn]

@Togetherdec @andyburnham Giving politicians and public servants less power will make us safer . Not giving them more power

[Enoch W Wright @enoch_righ22919]

BBC EXPOSED! - Civil Servants Writing the News Inside the Newsroom!

For years the BBC has told us it is independent, impartial, and free from government interference. They were very proud of that line.

Now the Telegraph reports that 39 civil servants have been placed inside BBC

[Together @Togetherdec]

A "social media ban" really just means "Papers Please to get online"

Age checks do not stay confined to children - they apply to ALL, and likely mean IDENTITY CHECKS

You have no mandate @andyburnham

CONTACT YOUR MP - FREE TOOL:
https://t.co/6d120kZ9Xn

#dontidtheinternet

[Dino Turn @DinozTurn]

@BenFordhamLive Public sector needs to be cut in half . We wasted millions on this useless garbage

[Dino Turn @DinozTurn]

@RositaDaz48 Propaganda minister is a fraud and thief

[Rosita Díaz @RositaDaz48]

Coalition demands Anthony Albanese stand down Anika Wells after FOI records fail to substantiate meetings she cited to justify taxpayer-funded trip
Calls have come for Anika Wells to repay the cost of her flight home and be stood down after records from Don Farrell’s office failed to substantiate a meeting she said took place. 

✍🏽ConorBreslin

Sarah Henderson has demanded Anthony Albanese stand down Communications Minister Anika Wells after freedom of information records failed to substantiate meetings she cited to justify a taxpayer-funded trip to Adelaide for a friend’s 40th birthday. 
Ms Wells spent about $3,700 travelling to Adelaide between June 6 and June 8 last year, defending the trip on the basis that she had official engagements alongside attending the birthday party. 
#But records obtained by the opposition showed Don Farrell’s office could not locate text messages, emails, diary entries or other documents confirming a meeting with his chief of staff.

[Dino Turn @DinozTurn]

@Ausbobsmit Another DEI failure

[Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education @craigkellyAFEE]

Yes, the same person who wants the government to have the power to create false & fictitious sock puppets to peddle government "information" - also spread disinformation to cover up her own false & fictitious "information" misuse of expenses.

Anika Wells herself, is a case as to why government should not have such powers.

[Dino Turn @DinozTurn]

@Ryandally08 The propaganda prince Albo

[Ryan Dally @Ryandally08]

BREAKING: THE BIGGEST CLIMATE SCANDAL IN AUSTRALIAN HISTORY

The Albanese Labor Government has just been caught red handed. New forensic evidence suggests they are using a compromised Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) to fabricate a climate crisis that simply does not exist.

A explosive forensic audit led by investigator Tom Berger and retired scientist Geoff Sherrington has uncovered widespread, systematic errors and fake readings within the BOM’s raw climate data.

We aren't talking about minor glitches, we are talking about copy and pasted data designed to make the past look cooler and the present look warmer.

The audit exposed blatant data manipulation at the Sydney Observatory:
•The Fabricated Data: Minimum temperatures from August 1907 were found completely duplicated and inserted into the August 1867 record.
•The Cover-Up: The Australian fact-checked the National Archives and confirmed this "double-up" does not exist in the original handwritten records. The online data used to justify sweeping climate policies is completely wrong.

For years, the BOM has operated on a “trust us” basis. Dr David Evans, the scientist who built Australia’s carbon accounting software, warns that this “secret climate business” mirrors the worst days of fraudulent medical drug trials, where researchers were under immense pressure to exaggerate results to fit a narrative.

Labor is terrified of an independent audit because they know their Net Zero house of cards will collapse if the public sees the real numbers.

Dr Jennifer Marohasy confirmed that outside of Adelaide, there has been no proper audit of Australia's weather stations.

If our historical data is corrupted with fake inputs, the AI forecasting models used for future planning become entirely useless.

The Albanese Government doesn't want the data audited because the data doesn't support their narrative.

They are destroying our economy, killing our energy grid, and forcing Net Zero targets on regular Australians based on copy and pasted climate fiction.

The question is simple, if the records are sound, why is Labor so opposed to an independent audit?

[Dino Turn @DinozTurn]

@craigkellyAFEE Not the role of government

[Bob @BobBurn97207272]

Anika Wells back in 5 December 2019: Complaining that the Morrison Government is restricting her freedom of speech, right to protest and debate in Parliament.

Anika Wells on 15 October 2026: Fuck your free speech.