@VitaMister@PSand8107@SyaadVibez@kaniiACFC@NickRTFM He was fixated on specifically women tho. Speaking of average, 83-84 rated Marcos Llorente has been bossing Ultimate Team midfielders for YEARS now besides being rated rather low.
@Eoghanfv@Mac_mane4@regan_brannigan@FootyChats_@JadenAFC The numbers are not based on purchase but on activity. 10-20% is quite a big part. Besides that, it may also speak to a lot of women to play the game, as they feel more represented. There are also a lot of men who love to see the inclusion. I also watch a lot of women's football.
@NavyBluesBurner@CallumSavage24 She had some rough patches last year due to injuries but still did well. She scored a brace against Germany in the Nations League final. Important goals in the copa de la reina final in the last 2 years. Played a lot as CM as well during Aitana's and Alexia's injuries.
@Eoghanfv@Mac_mane4@regan_brannigan@FootyChats_@JadenAFC The world cup final had 222m viewers. The UWCL final had 50m viewers. Its not as popular as man's football, but nothing is being shoved down YOUR throat.
Statistics say 10-20% of the playerbase is female. If 12m copies get sold, 1.2m-2.4m is female. Its for them. Not for you.
@Mac_mane4@saIIisosa@regan_brannigan@FootyChats_@JadenAFC We've seen ST Cech, GK Crouch. CB Haaland. If you had the ability to read more than 1 line, you'd see that I referred to the current football world. Not the sport itself. The setting is never meant to be accurate. In what setting will Pele ever play in the same team as Lamine?
@Mac_mane4@saIIisosa@regan_brannigan@FootyChats_@JadenAFC My logic is quite simple to follow. FUT isn't made to be accurate, or representative to the current football world. People are outraged that women in-game can be better than male equivalents. If accuracy is important, I don't believe having icons does it much justice either.
@nhur1974@_slimeXD_@KalshiFC The vice president didn't have the power to even appoint referees to matches. How would he have the power to control their career?
The money went to Dasnil 95. It was in exchange for technical reports, scouting material, DVDs and analysis. All proven and completely legal.
@nhur1974@_slimeXD_@KalshiFC Then show the evidence to the court. A lot of charges against Barcelona were dropped exactly BECAUSE no evidence was found. No transfers to the referees were found. The vice president didn't have the power to appoint referees to certain matches. Literally no evidence at all.
@Hash2277@JosipFCB93@grok Only one?
Straw man fallacy: "If you think..."
Ad hominem: "no matter how much your echo chamber wants it to be." and "that you seem unwilling to acknowledge."
Tu Quoque: Lecturing Josip on his "nuance, contradiction and complexity."
@Hash2277@JosipFCB93@grok You're literally having a monologue with an LLM trying to prove a far-fetched point.
You haven't made a single point. Haven't disproven anything that you replied to. All you've done is commit fallacies in your reasoning.
@nhur1974@_slimeXD_@KalshiFC No explanation, no depth. Just surface level accusations. There is no evidence that the vice president could influence any aspect of a game.
@Daniel019077@voetbalzonenl Mee eens, maar ik kan me wel goed voorstellen dat zulke (en andere) debielen het minder snel zullen doen wanneer ze zien dat er consequenties zijn. Dit soort mensen zijn normaliter gewend om achter een fake account dingen te roepen zonder de consequenties ervan te zien.